World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan W. Pillow

Jonathan W. Pillow

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
11694
World Ranking
6121
National Ranking
2674

Jonathan W. Pillow publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Pillow sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan W. Pillow D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Pillow sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Jonathan W. Pillow is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States and specializes in the field of neuroscience, with a primary focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their research spans various subfields including artificial intelligence, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, and biophysics.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neurobiology and insect physiology research
  • Memory and neural mechanisms
  • Gaussian processes and Bayesian inference
  • Functional brain connectivity studies

Jonathan W. Pillow has contributed to multiple frequent publication venues, with significant numbers of publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Nature
  • Neural Computation
  • Nature Neuroscience

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Mice alternate between discrete strategies during perceptual decision-making," 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Prefrontal cortex exhibits multidimensional dynamic encoding during decision-making," 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Extracting the dynamics of behavior in sensory decision-making experiments," 2021, Neuron
  • "Opponent control of behavior by dorsomedial striatal pathways depends on task demands and internal state," 2022, Nature Neuroscience
  • "Neural anatomy and optical microscopy (NAOMi) simulation for evaluating calcium imaging methods," 2021, Journal of Neuroscience Methods

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Zoe C. Ashwood
  • Carlos D. Brody
  • Ilana B. Witten
  • Nicholas Roy
  • Anne E Urai

Jonathan W. Pillow was recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2011, an acknowledgment reflecting their contributions within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • Spatio-temporal correlations and visual signalling in a complete neuronal population

    Jonathan William Pillow;Jonathon Shlens;Liam Paninski;Alexander Sher

  • Discovering Event Structure in Continuous Narrative Perception and Memory

    Christopher Baldassano;Janice Chen;Asieh Zadbood;Jonathan William Pillow

  • Spike-triggered neural characterization.

    Odelia Schwartz;Jonathan W. Pillow;Nicole C. Rust;Eero P. Simoncelli

  • Prediction and decoding of retinal ganglion cell responses with a probabilistic spiking model.

    Jonathan W. Pillow;Liam Paninski;Valerie J. Uzzell;Eero P. Simoncelli

  • Characterization of Neural Responses with Stochastic Stimuli

    Eero Simoncelli;Jonathan W. Pillow;Jonathan W. Pillow;Jonathan W. Pillow;Liam Paninski;Liam Paninski;Liam Paninski;Odelia Schwartz;Odelia Schwartz;Odelia Schwartz

  • Single-trial spike trains in parietal cortex reveal discrete steps during decision-making

    Kenneth W. Latimer;Jacob L. Yates;Miriam L.R. Meister;Miriam L.R. Meister;Alexander C Huk

  • Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Stochastic Integrate-and-Fire Neural Encoding Model

    Liam Paninski;Jonathan W. Pillow;Eero P. Simoncelli

  • Statistical models for neural encoding, decoding, and optimal stimulus design

    Liam Paninski;Jonathan William Pillow;Jeremy Lewi

  • Encoding and decoding in parietal cortex during sensorimotor decision-making

    Il Memming Park;Miriam L.R. Meister;Alexander C. Huk;Jonathan William Pillow

  • Combined Social and Spatial Coding in a Descending Projection from the Prefrontal Cortex

    Malavika Murugan;Hee Jae Jang;Michelle Park;Ellia M. Miller

  • Dissociated functional significance of decision-related activity in the primate dorsal stream

    Leor N. Katz;Jacob L. Yates;Jonathan W. Pillow;Alexander C. Huk

  • Computational approaches to fMRI analysis.

    Jonathan D Cohen;Nathaniel Daw;Barbara Engelhardt;Uri Hasson

  • Mice alternate between discrete strategies during perceptual decision-making

    Unknown

  • Unsupervised identification of the internal states that shape natural behavior.

    Adam J. Calhoun;Jonathan W. Pillow;Mala Murthy

  • Dimensionality reduction in neural models: an information-theoretic generalization of spike-triggered average and covariance analysis.

    Jonathan William Pillow;Eero P. Simoncelli

  • Prefrontal cortex exhibits multidimensional dynamic encoding during decision-making.

    Mikio C. Aoi;Mikio C. Aoi;Valerio Mante;Jonathan W. Pillow

  • Model-based decoding, information estimation, and change-point detection techniques for multineuron spike trains

    Jonathan W. Pillow;Yashar Ahmadian;Liam Paninski

  • A Model-Based Spike Sorting Algorithm for Removing Correlation Artifacts in Multi-Neuron Recordings

    Jonathan W. Pillow;Jonathon Shlens;E. J. Chichilnisky;Eero P. Simoncelli

  • Volumetric two-photon imaging of neurons using stereoscopy (vTwINS)

    Alexander Song;Adam S. Charles;Sue Ann Koay;Jeff L. Gauthier

  • Error-correcting dynamics in visual working memory

    Matthew F. Panichello;Brian DePasquale;Jonathan William Pillow;Timothy J. Buschman

  • Modeling the impact of common noise inputs on the network activity of retinal ganglion cells

    Michael Vidne;Yashar Ahmadian;Jonathon Shlens;Jonathan W. Pillow

  • Perceptual Completion across the Vertical Meridian and the Role of Early Visual Cortex

    Jonathan William Pillow;Nava Rubin

Frequent Co-Authors

Liam Paninski
Liam Paninski Columbia University
Eero P. Simoncelli
Eero P. Simoncelli New York University
Fred Rieke
Fred Rieke University of Washington
Kenneth A. Norman
Kenneth A. Norman Princeton University
Carlos D. Brody
Carlos D. Brody Princeton University
Yael Niv
Yael Niv Princeton University
E. J. Chichilnisky
E. J. Chichilnisky Stanford University
Ilana B. Witten
Ilana B. Witten Princeton University
David W. Tank
David W. Tank Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to a range of rewarding careers, both within research and clinical environments. For those seeking flexible education opportunities, there’s a growing number of online certifications that pay well, many of which complement a background in neuroscience by providing specialized skills in high demand.

If you are looking for easiest online degrees to start or bolster your academic journey, there are several options that offer a strong foundation without overwhelming workloads. Some degrees even focus on related areas such as psychology or biology, providing useful pathways into graduate study or work.

Affordability is another key consideration. Fields like social work and behavioral therapy offer some of the cheapest msw programs and bcba school online options, making them accessible stepping stones for students interested in applying neuroscience to help others.

By combining neuroscience with affordable and flexible online education, you can shape a career that fits your interests, budget, and desired impact in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan W. Pillow

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles