World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 53 12899 11605 3412 2789 135 16400
Environmental Sciences 59 3034 2900 1183 1097 160 18018

Dominic M. Di Toro publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dominic M. Di Toro between 1964 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dominic M. Di Toro published across 62 years, from 1964 to 2025, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 1996. 6 of the 179 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 1996. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 3 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications
1964 2025

179 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dominic M. Di Toro: publications per year, 1964 to 2025
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 1
1970 1
1971 1
1972 3
1973 2
1974 1
1975 2
1976 1
1977 0
1978 1
1979 3
1980 4
1981 2
1982 2
1983 4
1984 2
1985 2
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 5
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 2
1996 12
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 6
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 10
2006 5
2007 4
2008 5
2009 6
2010 0
2011 4
2012 3
2013 11
2014 4
2015 6
2016 5
2017 11
2018 6
2019 3
2020 3
2021 2
2022 2
2023 7
2024 3
2025 3
Total 179
Download as CSV

Dominic M. Di Toro publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic M. Di Toro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539 160
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Dominic M. Di Toro D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic M. Di Toro sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177 59
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For leadership in the development and application of mathematical models for establishing water-quality criteria and making management decisions.

Overview

Dominic M. Di Toro is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within environmental science and chemistry, focusing on topics related to toxic organic pollutants, radioactive element chemistry, environmental remediation, and water treatment technologies.

The main fields of study covered by their publications include Environmental Science and Chemistry. More specifically, subfields they have contributed to are Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Pollution; Environmental Chemistry; Water Science and Technology; and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Dominic M. Di Toro's work addresses several key topics:

  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Iron oxide chemistry and applications

The scientist has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • Marine Chemistry
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials

Recent research publications include:

  • Reduction of 3-Nitro-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One (NTO) by the Hematite-Aqueous Fe(II) Redox Couple, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Reductive Transformation of 3-Nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) by Leonardite Humic Acid and Anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • pKa prediction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl acids in water using in silico gas phase stretching vibrational frequencies and infrared intensities, 2023, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • Determination of ambient dissolved metal ligand complexation parameters via kinetics and pseudo-voltammetry experiments, 2021, Marine Chemistry
  • Modeling Time-Dependent Aquatic Toxicity of Hydrocarbons: Role of Organism Weight, Temperature, and Substance Hydrophobicity, 2022, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Common collaborators in their research include:

  • Richard F. Carbonaro
  • Herbert E. Allen
  • Pei C. Chiu
  • Jimmy Murillo-Gelvez
  • Kevin P. Hickey

Dominic M. Di Toro is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, an award earned in 2005 for leadership in the development and application of mathematical models used to establish water-quality criteria and guide management decisions.

Best Publications

  • Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Christopher S. Zarba;David J. Hansen;Walter J. Berry

  • Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical Basis

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Herbert E. Allen;Harold L. Bergman;Joseph S. Meyer

  • TOXICITY OF CADMIUM IN SEDIMENTS: THE ROLE OF ACID VOLATILE SULFIDE

    Dominic M. Di Toro;John D. Mahony;David J. Hansen;K. John Scott

  • The biotic ligand model : a historical overview

    Paul R. Paquin;Joseph W. Gorsuch;Simon Apte;Graeme E. Batley

  • Acid volatile sulfide predicts the acute toxicity of cadmium and nickel in sediments

    Dominic M. Di Toro;John D. Mahony;David J. Hansen;K. John Scott

  • Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 2. Application to acute copper toxicity in freshwater fish and Daphnia.

    Robert C. Santore;Dominic M. Di Toro;Paul R. Paquin;Herbert E. Allen

  • TECHNICAL BASIS AND PROPOSAL FOR DERIVING SEDIMENT QUALITY CRITERIA FOR METALS

    Gerald T. Ankley;Dominic M. Di Toro;David J. Hansen;Walter J. Berry

  • Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. I. Water and tissue

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath;David J. Hansen

  • A Dynamic Model of the Phytoplankton Population in the Sacramento—San Joaquin Delta

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Donald J. O'connor;Robert V. Thomann

  • Reversible and resistant components of PCB adsorption-desorption: isotherms.

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Lewis M. Horzempa

  • A Terrestrial Biotic Ligand Model. 1. Development and Application to Cu and Ni Toxicities to Barley Root Elongation in Soils

    Sagar Thakali;Herbert E Allen;Dominic M Di Toro;Alexander A Ponizovsky

  • Predicting the toxicity of metal-spiked laboratory sediments using acid-volatile sulfide and interstitial water normalizations

    W.J. Berry;D.J. Hansen;W.S. Boothman;J.D. Mahony

  • Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. II. Mixtures and sediments

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath

  • Predicting sediment metal toxicity using a sediment biotic ligand model: methodology and initial application.

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath;David J. Hansen;Walter J. Berry

  • Effects of nonreversibility, particle concentration, and ionic strength on heavy-metal sorption.

    Dominic M. Di Toro;John D. Mahony;Paul R. Kirchgraber;Ann L. O'Byrne

  • Predicting the toxicity of metal‐contaminated field sediments using interstitial concentration of metals and acid‐volatile sulfide normalizations

    D.J. Hansen;W.J. Berry;W.S. Boothman;C.E. Pesch

  • A particle interaction model of reversible organic chemical sorption

    Dominic M. Di Toro

  • Delta Method For Estimating Primary Production, Respiration, And Reaeration In Streams

    Steven C. Chapra;Dominic M. Di Toro

  • Predicting the toxicity of neat and weathered crude oil: Toxic potential and the toxicity of saturated mixtures

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath;William A. Stubblefield

  • Terrestrial biotic ligand model. 2. Application to Ni and Cu toxicities to plants, invertebrates, and microbes in soil.

    Sagar Thakali;Herbert E. Allen;Dominic M. Di Toro;Alexander A. Ponizovsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert E. Allen
Herbert E. Allen University of Delaware
David J. Hansen
David J. Hansen Environmental Protection Agency
Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency
Jeremy M. Testa
Jeremy M. Testa University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Thomas F. Parkerton
Thomas F. Parkerton ExxonMobil (United States)
Stanley I. Sandler
Stanley I. Sandler University of Delaware
Geoffrey I. Sunahara
Geoffrey I. Sunahara McGill University
Robert M. Burgess
Robert M. Burgess Environmental Protection Agency
David R. Mount
David R. Mount Environmental Protection Agency
Jalal Hawari
Jalal Hawari Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental data analysis and spatial mapping. Students interested in this area can explore gis degree programs that enhance technical skills for managing and interpreting environmental information.

Leadership and policy-making are also essential components of environmental work. Many professionals pursue a Master of Public Administration (MPA) to influence environmental policies and sustainable development strategies. Accessible options like the best online mpa programs offer flexibility for working individuals aiming to expand their impact in public service roles.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is vital in environmental sciences. A background in sociology complements this by examining how communities interact with their environments. Those interested can consider earning a sociology bachelor degree online to develop insights into social dynamics shaping environmental issues.

For advanced career growth, obtaining a doctoral degree without the lengthy dissertation process is increasingly popular. Programs like online doctoral programs without dissertation provide a streamlined path to high-level expertise, ideal for professionals seeking leadership in environmental education, research, or administration.

Best Scientists Citing Dominic M. Di Toro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles