World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
59
Citations
18018
World Ranking
3031
National Ranking
1183

Chemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
16400
World Ranking
12899
National Ranking
3412

Dominic M. Di Toro publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic M. Di Toro sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Dominic M. Di Toro D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominic M. Di Toro sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For leadership in the development and application of mathematical models for establishing water-quality criteria and making management decisions.

Overview

Dominic M. Di Toro is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within environmental science and chemistry, focusing on topics related to toxic organic pollutants, radioactive element chemistry, environmental remediation, and water treatment technologies.

The main fields of study covered by their publications include Environmental Science and Chemistry. More specifically, subfields they have contributed to are Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Pollution; Environmental Chemistry; Water Science and Technology; and Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment.

Dominic M. Di Toro's work addresses several key topics:

  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
  • Advanced oxidation water treatment
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
  • Iron oxide chemistry and applications

The scientist has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
  • Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • Marine Chemistry
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials

Recent research publications include:

  • Reduction of 3-Nitro-1,2,4-Triazol-5-One (NTO) by the Hematite-Aqueous Fe(II) Redox Couple, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Reductive Transformation of 3-Nitro-1,2,4-triazol-5-one (NTO) by Leonardite Humic Acid and Anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), 2021, Environmental Science & Technology
  • pKa prediction of per- and polyfluoroalkyl acids in water using in silico gas phase stretching vibrational frequencies and infrared intensities, 2023, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
  • Determination of ambient dissolved metal ligand complexation parameters via kinetics and pseudo-voltammetry experiments, 2021, Marine Chemistry
  • Modeling Time-Dependent Aquatic Toxicity of Hydrocarbons: Role of Organism Weight, Temperature, and Substance Hydrophobicity, 2022, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Common collaborators in their research include:

  • Richard F. Carbonaro
  • Herbert E. Allen
  • Pei C. Chiu
  • Jimmy Murillo-Gelvez
  • Kevin P. Hickey

Dominic M. Di Toro is a member of the National Academy of Engineering, an award earned in 2005 for leadership in the development and application of mathematical models used to establish water-quality criteria and guide management decisions.

Best Publications

  • Technical basis for establishing sediment quality criteria for nonionic organic chemicals using equilibrium partitioning

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Christopher S. Zarba;David J. Hansen;Walter J. Berry

  • Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 1. Technical Basis

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Herbert E. Allen;Harold L. Bergman;Joseph S. Meyer

  • TOXICITY OF CADMIUM IN SEDIMENTS: THE ROLE OF ACID VOLATILE SULFIDE

    Dominic M. Di Toro;John D. Mahony;David J. Hansen;K. John Scott

  • The biotic ligand model : a historical overview

    Paul R. Paquin;Joseph W. Gorsuch;Simon Apte;Graeme E. Batley

  • Acid volatile sulfide predicts the acute toxicity of cadmium and nickel in sediments

    Dominic M. Di Toro;John D. Mahony;David J. Hansen;K. John Scott

  • Biotic ligand model of the acute toxicity of metals. 2. Application to acute copper toxicity in freshwater fish and Daphnia.

    Robert C. Santore;Dominic M. Di Toro;Paul R. Paquin;Herbert E. Allen

  • TECHNICAL BASIS AND PROPOSAL FOR DERIVING SEDIMENT QUALITY CRITERIA FOR METALS

    Gerald T. Ankley;Dominic M. Di Toro;David J. Hansen;Walter J. Berry

  • Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. I. Water and tissue

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath;David J. Hansen

  • A Dynamic Model of the Phytoplankton Population in the Sacramento—San Joaquin Delta

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Donald J. O'connor;Robert V. Thomann

  • Reversible and resistant components of PCB adsorption-desorption: isotherms.

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Lewis M. Horzempa

  • A Terrestrial Biotic Ligand Model. 1. Development and Application to Cu and Ni Toxicities to Barley Root Elongation in Soils

    Sagar Thakali;Herbert E Allen;Dominic M Di Toro;Alexander A Ponizovsky

  • Predicting the toxicity of metal-spiked laboratory sediments using acid-volatile sulfide and interstitial water normalizations

    W.J. Berry;D.J. Hansen;W.S. Boothman;J.D. Mahony

  • Technical basis for narcotic chemicals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon criteria. II. Mixtures and sediments

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath

  • Predicting sediment metal toxicity using a sediment biotic ligand model: methodology and initial application.

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath;David J. Hansen;Walter J. Berry

  • Effects of nonreversibility, particle concentration, and ionic strength on heavy-metal sorption.

    Dominic M. Di Toro;John D. Mahony;Paul R. Kirchgraber;Ann L. O'Byrne

  • Predicting the toxicity of metal‐contaminated field sediments using interstitial concentration of metals and acid‐volatile sulfide normalizations

    D.J. Hansen;W.J. Berry;W.S. Boothman;C.E. Pesch

  • A particle interaction model of reversible organic chemical sorption

    Dominic M. Di Toro

  • Delta Method For Estimating Primary Production, Respiration, And Reaeration In Streams

    Steven C. Chapra;Dominic M. Di Toro

  • Predicting the toxicity of neat and weathered crude oil: Toxic potential and the toxicity of saturated mixtures

    Dominic M. Di Toro;Joy A. McGrath;William A. Stubblefield

  • Terrestrial biotic ligand model. 2. Application to Ni and Cu toxicities to plants, invertebrates, and microbes in soil.

    Sagar Thakali;Herbert E. Allen;Dominic M. Di Toro;Alexander A. Ponizovsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert E. Allen
Herbert E. Allen University of Delaware
David J. Hansen
David J. Hansen Environmental Protection Agency
Gerald T. Ankley
Gerald T. Ankley Environmental Protection Agency
Jeremy M. Testa
Jeremy M. Testa University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Thomas F. Parkerton
Thomas F. Parkerton ExxonMobil (United States)
Stanley I. Sandler
Stanley I. Sandler University of Delaware
Geoffrey I. Sunahara
Geoffrey I. Sunahara McGill University
Robert M. Burgess
Robert M. Burgess Environmental Protection Agency
David R. Mount
David R. Mount Environmental Protection Agency
Jalal Hawari
Jalal Hawari Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental data analysis and spatial mapping. Students interested in this area can explore gis degree programs that enhance technical skills for managing and interpreting environmental information.

Leadership and policy-making are also essential components of environmental work. Many professionals pursue a Master of Public Administration (MPA) to influence environmental policies and sustainable development strategies. Accessible options like the best online mpa programs offer flexibility for working individuals aiming to expand their impact in public service roles.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is vital in environmental sciences. A background in sociology complements this by examining how communities interact with their environments. Those interested can consider earning a sociology bachelor degree online to develop insights into social dynamics shaping environmental issues.

For advanced career growth, obtaining a doctoral degree without the lengthy dissertation process is increasingly popular. Programs like online doctoral programs without dissertation provide a streamlined path to high-level expertise, ideal for professionals seeking leadership in environmental education, research, or administration.

Best Scientists Citing Dominic M. Di Toro

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles