World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
28210
World Ranking
2261
National Ranking
43

Naftali Tishby publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naftali Tishby sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Naftali Tishby D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Naftali Tishby sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Mathematical Neuroscience Prize, Israel Brain Technologies (IBT)

Overview

Naftali Tishby is affiliated with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem in Israel and specializes in neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, molecular biology, experimental and cognitive psychology, electrical and electronic engineering, and management science and operations research.

Their work predominantly focuses on neural dynamics and brain function, gene regulatory network analysis, categorization, perception, and language, multisensory perception and integration, advanced memory and neural computing, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, as well as protein structure and dynamics.

Among their frequent co-authors are Noga Zaslavsky, Charles Kemp, Terry Regier, Karee Garvin, and Hadar Levi-Aharoni.

Naftali Tishby has published extensively in several venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Journal of Language Evolution
  • PRX Life
  • Physical Review Research

Notable recent papers include:

  • embo - Empirical Bottleneck, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Surprise response as a probe for compressed memory states, 2020, PLoS Computational Biology
  • The evolution of color naming reflects pressure for efficiency: Evidence from the recent past, 2022, Journal of Language Evolution
  • The Dual Information Bottleneck, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Value-complexity tradeoff explains mouse navigational learning, 2020, PLoS Computational Biology

Naftali Tishby received the Mathematical Neuroscience Prize from Israel Brain Technologies (IBT) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • The information bottleneck method

    Naftali Tishby;Fernando C. N. Pereira;William Bialek

  • Machine learning and the physical sciences

    Giuseppe Carleo;J. Ignacio Cirac;Kyle Cranmer;Laurent Daudet

  • Selective Sampling Using the Query by Committee Algorithm

    Yoav Freund;H. Sebastian Seung;Eli Shamir;Naftali Tishby

  • DISTRIBUTIONAL CLUSTERING OF ENGLISH WORDS

    Fernando Pereira;Naftali Tishby;Lillian Lee

  • The Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and Applications

    Shai Fine;Yoram Singer;Naftali Tishby

  • Deep learning and the information bottleneck principle

    Naftali Tishby;Noga Zaslavsky

  • Opening the Black Box of Deep Neural Networks via Information

    Ravid Shwartz-Ziv;Naftali Tishby

  • The power of amnesia: learning probabilistic automata with variable memory length

    Dana Ron;Yoram Singer;Naftali Tishby

  • The Power of Amnesia

    Dana Ron;Yoram Singer;Naftali Tishby

  • Document clustering using word clusters via the information bottleneck method

    Noam Slonim;Naftali Tishby

  • Predictability, Complexity, and Learning

    William Bialek;Ilya Nemenman;Naftali Tishby

  • Statistical mechanics of learning from examples

    Hyunjune Sebastian Seung;Hyunjune Sebastian Seung;H. Sompolinsky;H. Sompolinsky;N. Tishby

  • Euclidean Embedding of Co-occurrence Data

    Amir Globerson;Gal Chechik;Fernando Pereira;Naftali Tishby

  • Agglomerative Information Bottleneck

    Noam Slonim;Naftali Tishby

  • Margin based feature selection - theory and algorithms

    Ran Gilad-Bachrach;Amir Navot;Naftali Tishby

  • Information Bottleneck for Gaussian Variables

    Gal Chechik;Amir Globerson;Naftali Tishby;Yair Weiss

  • Distributional word clusters vs. words for text categorization

    Ron Bekkerman;Ran El-Yaniv;Naftali Tishby;Yoad Winter

  • A statistical approach to learning and generalization in layered neural networks

    Esther Levin;Naftali Tishby;Sara A. Solla

  • Unsupervised document classification using sequential information maximization

    Noam Slonim;Nir Friedman;Naftali Tishby

  • Cortical activity flips among quasi-stationary states

    Moshe Abeles;Hagai Bergman;Itay Gat;Isaac Meilijson

Frequent Co-Authors

Amir Globerson
Amir Globerson Tel Aviv University
Noam Slonim
Noam Slonim IBM (United States)
William Bialek
William Bialek Princeton University
Gal Chechik
Gal Chechik Bar-Ilan University
Terry Regier
Terry Regier University of California, Berkeley
Fernando Pereira
Fernando Pereira Google (United States)
Ohad Shamir
Ohad Shamir Weizmann Institute of Science
Yoram Singer
Yoram Singer Princeton University
Israel Nelken
Israel Nelken Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Shlomo Dubnov
Shlomo Dubnov University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open up a world of possibilities, not only in technology but also in related STEM fields. Many students interested in technology-driven careers look for flexible study options, such as a 2-year computer science degree online, which allows for accelerated learning and quicker entry into the job market.

For those interested in environmental issues, combining computer science skills with environmental knowledge can lead to high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds. Similarly, students curious about applying technology in engineering can consider an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering program or pursue the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree for a budget-friendly STEM credentials.

By exploring these related online degrees and career paths, students can tailor their education to their interests and long-term goals, gaining valuable skills in both computer science and interdisciplinary areas that are shaping the future workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Naftali Tishby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles