World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
89
Citations
75332
World Ranking
625
National Ranking
331

Fernando Pereira publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Pereira sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 311 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Fernando Pereira D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fernando Pereira sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - ACM Fellow For contributions to machine-learning models of natural language and biological sequences.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Programming language
  • Machine learning

Fernando Pereira focuses on Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Machine learning, Programming language and Parsing. The study of Artificial intelligence is intertwined with the study of Pattern recognition in a number of ways. His Natural language processing research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Speech recognition and Vector space model.

His Machine learning research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Domain, Domain adaptation, Field and Test data. Fernando Pereira combines subjects such as Probabilistic logic and Sequence labeling with his study of Conditional random field. His Sequence labeling research includes themes of Structured prediction, Conditional entropy and Bayesian network.

His most cited work include:

  • Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data (11231 citations)
  • The information bottleneck method (1820 citations)
  • Biographies, Bollywood, Boom-boxes and Blenders: Domain Adaptation for Sentiment Classification (1700 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Fernando Pereira spends much of his time researching Artificial intelligence, Natural language processing, Machine learning, Programming language and Natural language. His Artificial intelligence research includes elements of Speech recognition and Pattern recognition. His Pattern recognition research focuses on Discriminative model and Conditional random field.

His Natural language processing research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Semantics, Bigram and Grammar. His work investigates the relationship between Bigram and topics such as Probabilistic logic that intersect with problems in Algorithm. Fernando Pereira studies Machine learning, namely Semi-supervised learning.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Artificial intelligence (50.61%)
  • Natural language processing (30.20%)
  • Machine learning (15.10%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2020)?

  • Petri net (11.84%)
  • Artificial intelligence (50.61%)
  • Embedded system (7.76%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Fernando Pereira focuses on Petri net, Artificial intelligence, Embedded system, Programming language and Code generation. The Petri net study combines topics in areas such as User interface, Software and Web application. His Artificial intelligence research incorporates themes from Machine learning, Pattern recognition and Natural language processing.

His Machine learning study incorporates themes from Classifier, Pose and Hidden Markov model. His study looks at the relationship between Programming language and fields such as XML, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. His Algorithm study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Graphical model, Conditional random field, Markov model and Maximum-entropy Markov model.

Between 2010 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Large-Scale Cross-Document Coreference Using Distributed Inference and Hierarchical Models (114 citations)
  • Wikilinks: A Large-scale Cross-Document Coreference Corpus Labeled via Links to Wikipedia (85 citations)
  • Collective Entity Resolution with Multi-Focal Attention (84 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Programming language
  • Machine learning

Fernando Pereira spends much of his time researching Artificial intelligence, Programming language, Natural language processing, Petri net and Information retrieval. Fernando Pereira has researched Artificial intelligence in several fields, including Machine learning, Isolation, Speech recognition and Pattern recognition. His work in the fields of Graphical model overlaps with other areas such as Set.

In the subject of general Programming language, his work in Bottom-up parsing and Top-down parsing is often linked to Sling and Frame, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His study in Rule of inference extends to Natural language processing with its themes. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Microcontroller, Embedded system, User interface and Control theory.

Best Publications

  • Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data

    John D. Lafferty;Andrew McCallum;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • A theory of learning from different domains

    Shai Ben-David;John Blitzer;Koby Crammer;Alex Kulesza

  • Advances in neural information processing systems

    Unknown

  • Biographies, Bollywood, Boom-boxes and Blenders: Domain Adaptation for Sentiment Classification

    John Blitzer;Mark Dredze;Fernando Pereira

  • Gemma: Open models based on gemini research and technology

    Unknown

  • The information bottleneck method

    Naftali Tishby;Fernando C. N. Pereira;William Bialek

  • Gemini 2.5: Pushing the frontier with advanced reasoning, multimodality, long context, and next generation agentic capabilities

    Unknown

  • Analysis of Representations for Domain Adaptation

    Shai Ben-David;John Blitzer;Koby Crammer;Fernando Pereira

  • The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data

    A. Halevy;P. Norvig;F. Pereira

  • Advances in neural information processing systems

    Unknown

  • Maximum Entropy Markov Models for Information Extraction and Segmentation

    Andrew McCallum;Dayne Freitag;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • Shallow parsing with conditional random fields

    Fei Sha;Fernando Pereira

  • Domain Adaptation with Structural Correspondence Learning

    John Blitzer;Ryan McDonald;Fernando Pereira

  • Definite clause grammars for language analysis—A survey of the formalism and a comparison with augmented transition networks

    Fernando C.N. Pereira;David H.D. Warren

  • DISTRIBUTIONAL CLUSTERING OF ENGLISH WORDS

    Fernando Pereira;Naftali Tishby;Lillian Lee

  • Weighted finite-state transducers in speech recognition

    Mehryar Mohri;Fernando Pereira;Michael Riley

  • Non-Projective Dependency Parsing using Spanning Tree Algorithms

    Ryan McDonald;Fernando Pereira;Kiril Ribarov;Jan Hajic

  • Online Large-Margin Training of Dependency Parsers

    Ryan McDonald;Koby Crammer;Fernando Pereira

  • Ellipsis and higher-order unification

    Mary Dalrymple;Stuart M. Shieber;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • INSIDE-OUTSIDE REESTIMATION FROM PARTIALLY BRACKETED CORPORA

    Fernando Pereira;Yves Schabes

  • Prolog and Natural-Language Analysis

    Fernando C. N. Pereira;Stuart M. Shieber

  • Similarity-Based Models of Word Cooccurrence Probabilities

    Ido Dagan;Lillian Lee;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • Online Learning of Approximate Dependency Parsing Algorithms.

    Ryan T. McDonald;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data

    J. Lafferty;A. McCallum;F. Pereira;Kevin Duh

Frequent Co-Authors

Koby Crammer
Koby Crammer Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Mark Dredze
Mark Dredze Johns Hopkins University
Andrew McCallum
Andrew McCallum University of Massachusetts Amherst
Stuart M. Shieber
Stuart M. Shieber Harvard University
Michael Riley
Michael Riley Google (United States)
Lillian Lee
Lillian Lee Cornell University
Partha Pratim Talukdar
Partha Pratim Talukdar Indian Institute of Science
Naftali Tishby
Naftali Tishby Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Mehryar Mohri
Mehryar Mohri Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for tech professionals continues to grow, making online degrees in related fields more accessible and valuable than ever. Students interested in expanding their Computer Science studies can explore options like a physics degree online. This option is ideal for those who want a solid science foundation alongside programming skills.

For those passionate about statistics, analytics, and AI, consider applying to data science programs. These pathways often offer flexible, affordable alternatives that teach students how to extract valuable insights from massive datasets—a crucial skill in today’s market.

Technical-minded students may benefit from an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering. This degree offers hands-on problem-solving opportunities while opening doors to careers in hardware, robotics, and telecommunications.

Additionally, many learners are boosting their resumes with certifications for jobs. These short-term credentials – often obtainable online – can quickly advance your career or provide specialized expertise valued by employers.

Best Scientists Citing Fernando Pereira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles