World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stuart M. Shieber

Stuart M. Shieber

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
16972
World Ranking
2459
National Ranking
1234

Stuart M. Shieber publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart M. Shieber sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 211 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Stuart M. Shieber D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stuart M. Shieber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - ACM Fellow For contributions to natural-language processing, and to open-access systems and policy.
  • 2004 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to the foundations of computational linguistics, to graphical and spokenlanguage interfaces, and to open scientific publishing.

Overview

Stuart M. Shieber is a researcher affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their work spans the field of Computer Science with a focus on Artificial Intelligence, supported by a range of publications primarily appearing in arXiv (Cornell University).

The main research topics covered by Shieber include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Text Readability and Simplification

Subfields of study explored by Shieber's research are primarily Artificial Intelligence, along with work in Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Computational Mechanics, and Management of Technology and Innovation.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Stuart M. Shieber include:

  • Causal Mediation Analysis for Interpreting Neural NLP: The Case of Gender Bias, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Harvard USPTO Patent Dataset: A Large-Scale, Well-Structured, and Multi-Purpose Corpus of Patent Applications, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • From Explicit CoT to Implicit CoT: Learning to Internalize CoT Step by Step, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Causal Analysis of Syntactic Agreement Mechanisms in Neural Language Models, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Implicit Chain of Thought Reasoning via Knowledge Distillation, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Shieber include Yuntian Deng, Sebastian Gehrmann, Yonatan Belinkov, Mirac Süzgün, and Joe Marks.

Their contributions to the academic community have been recognized through several awards, including being named an ACM Fellow in 2014 for contributions related to natural-language processing and open-access systems and policy. Earlier, in 2004, Shieber was made a Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) for significant contributions to computational linguistics, graphical and spoken language interfaces, and open scientific publishing.

Best Publications

  • An introduction to unification-based approaches to grammar

    Stuart M. Shieber

  • Evidence Against the Context-Freeness of Natural Language

    Stuart M. Shieber

  • Ellipsis and higher-order unification

    Mary Dalrymple;Stuart M. Shieber;Fernando C. N. Pereira

  • Design galleries: a general approach to setting parameters for computer graphics and animation

    J. Marks;B. Andalman;P. A. Beardsley;W. Freeman

  • Prolog and Natural-Language Analysis

    Fernando C. N. Pereira;Stuart M. Shieber

  • Challenges in Data-to-Document Generation

    Sam Joshua Wiseman;Stuart Merrill Shieber;Alexander Sasha Matthew Rush

  • An empirical study of algorithms for point-feature label placement

    Jon Christensen;Joe Marks;Stuart Shieber

  • Principles and implementation of deductive parsing

    Stuart M. Shieber;Yves Schabes;Fernando C.N. Pereira

  • Synchronous tree-adjoining grammars

    Stuart M. Shieber;Yves Schabes

  • Command parsing and rewrite system

    Stuart M. Shieber;John Armstrong;Rafael Jose Baptista;Bryan A. Bentz

  • Semantic-head-driven generation

    Stuart M. Shieber;Gertjan van Noord;Fernando C. N. Pereira;Robert C. Moore

  • The Formalism and Implementation of PATR-II

    Stuart Merrill Shieber;Hans Uszkoreit;Fernando Pereira;Jane Robinson

  • The Computational Complexity of Cartographic Label Placement

    Joe Marks;Stuart Merrill Shieber

  • An algorithm for generating quantifier scopings

    Jerry R. Hobbs;Stuart M. Shieber

  • Using Restriction to Extend Parsing Algorithms for Complex-Feature-Based Formalisms

    Stuart M. Shieber

  • Learning Global Features for Coreference Resolution

    Sam Wiseman;Alexander M. Rush;Stuart M. Shieber

  • A uniform architecture for parsing and generation

    Stuart M. Shieber

  • Learning Neural Templates for Text Generation

    Sam Wiseman;Stuart Shieber;Alexander Sasha Rush

  • An alternative conception of tree-adjoining derivation

    Yves Schabes;Stuart M. Shieber

  • Lessons from a restricted Turing test

    Stuart M. Shieber

  • Can Automatic Calculating Machines Be Said to Think

    M. H. A. Newman;Alan M. Turing;Geoffrey Jefferson;R. B. Braithwaite

  • Investigating Gender Bias in Language Models Using Causal Mediation Analysis

    Jesse Vig;Sebastian Gehrmann;Yonatan Belinkov;Sharon Qian

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander M. Rush
Alexander M. Rush Cornell University
Yonatan Belinkov
Yonatan Belinkov Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Barbara J. Grosz
Barbara J. Grosz Harvard University
Fernando Pereira
Fernando Pereira Google (United States)
Yves Schabes
Yves Schabes Ab Initio Software
Avi Pfeffer
Avi Pfeffer Charles River Laboratories (Netherlands)
Benjamin Van Durme
Benjamin Van Durme Johns Hopkins University
David C. Parkes
David C. Parkes Harvard University
Krzysztof Z. Gajos
Krzysztof Z. Gajos Harvard University
Michael O. Rabin
Michael O. Rabin Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in flexible learning, online degrees offer a practical way to enter or advance in computer science and related fields. There are many famous online colleges in the USA known for their rigorous and accredited programs. These institutions make tech education accessible to students everywhere.

Computer science skills lead to careers beyond programming. Many choose specialized degrees such as a masters in game design online, blending creativity with technical expertise for roles in the interactive entertainment industry. Others focus on vital security jobs by earning an accredited online cyber security degree, preparing graduates to protect systems and data.

Computer science backgrounds also open doors in fields like construction, thanks to technology’s growing role in project management. A construction management masters degree online combines digital tools with leadership skills, preparing students for new tech-driven construction careers.

Best Scientists Citing Stuart M. Shieber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles