World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Krzysztof Z. Gajos

Krzysztof Z. Gajos

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
11360
World Ranking
4582
National Ranking
2141

Krzysztof Z. Gajos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Krzysztof Z. Gajos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Krzysztof Z. Gajos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Krzysztof Z. Gajos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Krzysztof Z. Gajos is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific fields with a focus on the intersection of artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, and healthcare.

Their recent publications include work on decision-making processes, AI-assisted systems, and clinical reasoning. Notable papers are:

  • To Trust or to Think, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: the example of antidepressant selection, 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Conducting online virtual environment experiments with uncompensated, unsupervised samples, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Sex and age differences in "theory of mind" across 57 countries using the English version of the "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Anoopum S. Gupta, Zana Buçinca, Bernd Huber, Vineet Pandey, and Maja Barbara Malaya. These collaborations reflect their engagement with a network of scholars across disciplines related to AI and cognitive studies.

Gajos's publication record features venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Harvard Dataverse, Translational Psychiatry, and PLoS ONE. This range of publication venues highlights a multidisciplinary approach combining computer science, psychiatry, and experimental psychology.

Their work concentrates on key topics, including:

  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Their research also covers multiple subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Sociology and Political Science, and Family Practice. This interdisciplinary orientation aligns with their focus on integrating AI technologies into healthcare and understanding human cognitive processes.

In 2013, Krzysztof Z. Gajos was recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, indicating acknowledgment within the scientific community.

Best Publications

  • To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making

    Zana Buçinca;Maja Barbara Malaya;Krzysztof Z. Gajos

  • SUPPLE: automatically generating user interfaces

    Krzysztof Gajos;Daniel S. Weld

  • Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Shaun K. Kane;Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Susumu Harada

  • Understanding in-video dropouts and interaction peaks inonline lecture videos

    Juho Kim;Philip J. Guo;Daniel T. Seaton;Piotr Mitros

  • Proxy tasks and subjective measures can be misleading in evaluating explainable AI systems

    Zana Buçinca;Phoebe Lin;Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Elena L. Glassman

  • Predicting users' first impressions of website aesthetics with a quantification of perceived visual complexity and colorfulness

    Katharina Reinecke;Tom Yeh;Luke Miratrix;Rahmatri Mardiko

  • Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple

    Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Daniel S. Weld;Jacob O. Wobbrock

  • The efficacy of Web-based cognitive behavioral interventions for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Debora Duarte Macea;Debora Duarte Macea;Krzysztof Gajos;Yasser Armynd Daglia Calil;Felipe Fregni;Felipe Fregni

  • Platemate: crowdsourcing nutritional analysis from food photographs

    Jon Noronha;Eric Hysen;Haoqi Zhang;Krzysztof Z. Gajos

  • Opportunity Knocks: A System to Provide Cognitive Assistance with Transportation Services

    Donald J. Patterson;Lin Liao;Krzysztof Gajos;Michael Collier

  • Exploring the design space for adaptive graphical user interfaces

    Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Mary Czerwinski;Desney S. Tan;Daniel S. Weld

  • Automatically generating user interfaces adapted to users' motor and vision capabilities

    Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Jacob O. Wobbrock;Daniel S. Weld

  • Improving the performance of motor-impaired users with automatically-generated, ability-based interfaces

    Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Jacob O. Wobbrock;Daniel S. Weld

  • Evaluation of Artery Visualizations for Heart Disease Diagnosis

    M. Borkin;K. Gajos;A. Peters;D. Mitsouras

  • How machine-learning recommendations influence clinician treatment selections: the example of the antidepressant selection.

    Maia Jacobs;Melanie F. Pradier;Thomas H. McCoy;Roy H. Perlis

  • Crowdsourcing performance evaluations of user interfaces

    Steven Komarov;Katharina Reinecke;Krzysztof Z. Gajos

  • Human computation tasks with global constraints

    Haoqi Zhang;Edith Law;Rob Miller;Krzysztof Gajos

  • Predictability and accuracy in adaptive user interfaces

    Krzysztof Z. Gajos;Katherine Everitt;Desney S. Tan;Mary Czerwinski

  • Data-driven interaction techniques for improving navigation of educational videos

    Juho Kim;Philip J. Guo;Carrie J. Cai;Shang-Wen (Daniel) Li

  • Quantifying visual preferences around the world

    Katharina Reinecke;Krzysztof Z. Gajos

  • AXIS: Generating Explanations at Scale with Learnersourcing and Machine Learning

    Joseph Jay Williams;Juho Kim;Anna Rafferty;Samuel Maldonado

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel S. Weld
Daniel S. Weld University of Washington
Hanspeter Pfister
Hanspeter Pfister Harvard University
Jacob O. Wobbrock
Jacob O. Wobbrock University of Washington
Barbara J. Grosz
Barbara J. Grosz Harvard University
Steven Dow
Steven Dow University of California, San Diego
Philip J. Guo
Philip J. Guo University of California, San Diego
Margo Seltzer
Margo Seltzer University of British Columbia
Stuart M. Shieber
Stuart M. Shieber Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science in the USA offers a wide range of online degrees and flexible career pathways. For those looking to quickly enter the workforce, there are short careers that pay well in technology, such as web development, IT support, and cybersecurity.

Students interested in emerging technologies can pursue an ai online degree to gain specialized skills in machine learning and data science. These programs prepare graduates for in-demand roles and offer the convenience of online learning.

If you are still deciding which path to follow, exploring various college programs is a great way to find your interest and align your studies with your career goals. For those seeking advanced qualifications, some of the masters degrees in tech fields are accessible and can open doors to higher-level opportunities.

By exploring these online degrees and career options, you can tailor your education and advance your career in a fast-growing industry.

Best Scientists Citing Krzysztof Z. Gajos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles