World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
11050
World Ranking
6400
National Ranking
2856

Scott R. Klemmer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Klemmer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Scott R. Klemmer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Klemmer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2008 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Scott R. Klemmer is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting disciplines including Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with a focus on applications in Computer Science, Education, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work primarily addresses topics related to online education, including Online Learning and Analytics, Online and Blended Learning, and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled Adjacent Display of Relevant Discussion Helps Resolve Confusion, published in 2021 in the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. This paper explores mechanisms for improving learner comprehension by using adjacent displays of discussion content.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Matin Yarmand
  • Srishti Palani

Their research has appeared predominantly in the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

Klemmer has been recognized with distinctions such as:

  • ACM Senior Member in 2013
  • Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2008

Best Publications

  • How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design

    Scott R. Klemmer;Björn Hartmann;Leila Takayama

  • Peer and self assessment in massive online classes

    Chinmay Kulkarni;Koh Pang Wei;Huy Le;Daniel Chia

  • Two studies of opportunistic programming: interleaving web foraging, learning, and writing code

    Joel Brandt;Philip J. Guo;Joel Lewenstein;Mira Dontcheva

  • Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy

    Steven P. Dow;Alana Glassco;Jonathan Kass;Melissa Schwarz

  • Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis

    Björn Hartmann;Scott R. Klemmer;Michael Bernstein;Leith Abdulla

  • Shepherding the crowd yields better work

    Steven Dow;Anand Kulkarni;Scott Klemmer;Björn Hartmann

  • Example-centric programming: integrating web search into the development environment

    Joel Brandt;Mira Dontcheva;Marcos Weskamp;Scott R. Klemmer

  • The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site

    Scott R. Klemmer;Mark W. Newman;Ryan Farrell;Mark Bilezikjian

  • Suede: a Wizard of Oz prototyping tool for speech user interfaces

    Scott R. Klemmer;Anoop K. Sinha;Jack Chen;James A. Landay

  • Papier-Mache: toolkit support for tangible input

    Scott R. Klemmer;Jack Li;James Lin;James A. Landay

  • What would other programmers do: suggesting solutions to error messages

    Björn Hartmann;Daniel MacDougall;Joel Brandt;Scott R. Klemmer

  • ButterflyNet: a mobile capture and access system for field biology research

    Ron Yeh;Chunyuan Liao;Scott Klemmer;François Guimbretière

  • The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints

    Steven P. Dow;Kate Heddleston;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Where do web sites come from?: capturing and interacting with design history

    Scott R. Klemmer;Michael Thomsen;Ethan Phelps-Goodman;Robert Lee

  • Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition

    Björn Hartmann;Leith Abdulla;Manas Mittal;Scott R. Klemmer

  • PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance

    Chinmay E. Kulkarni;Michael S. Bernstein;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Prototyping dynamics: sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results

    Steven Dow;Julie Fortuna;Dan Schwartz;Beth Altringer

  • Designing with interactive example galleries

    Brian Lee;Savil Srivastava;Ranjitha Kumar;Ronen Brafman

  • Bricolage: example-based retargeting for web design

    Ranjitha Kumar;Jerry O. Talton;Salman Ahmad;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: Understanding Opportunistic Design

    B. Hartmann;S. Doorley;S.R. Klemmer

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
Björn Hartmann
Björn Hartmann University of California, Berkeley
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Steven Dow
Steven Dow University of California, San Diego
Philip J. Guo
Philip J. Guo University of California, San Diego
Daniel M. Russell
Daniel M. Russell University of Zurich
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Andreas Paepcke
Andreas Paepcke Stanford University
Wendy Ju
Wendy Ju Cornell University
Daniel L. Schwartz
Daniel L. Schwartz Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science opens the door to many related online degrees and career opportunities. Prospective students often search for affordable options, as cost is a major concern. Those interested in a broad introduction should explore the cheapest online bachelor degree programs to find flexible and budget-friendly ways to start their education journey.

For those wanting a technical edge, choosing the cheapest engineering degree is a great pathway to develop hands-on skills relevant to the tech industry. Aspiring leaders who hope to move into management roles may benefit from the affordable online executive mba programs, which provide essential business acumen alongside technical expertise.

Additionally, those interested in the intersection of technology and information science can look into the cheapest mlis degree online. This degree prepares graduates for roles in data management, digital libraries, and information systems. Each pathway offers unique benefits, and finding the right, affordable option can set the stage for a successful tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. Klemmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles