World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 47 6400 6214 2856 2750 146 11050

Scott R. Klemmer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott R. Klemmer between 1997 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott R. Klemmer published across 25 years, from 1997 to 2021, averaging 6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2011. 5 of the 151 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2011. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 4 publications
1997 2021

151 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott R. Klemmer: publications per year, 1997 to 2021
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 7
2003 4
2004 4
2005 7
2006 7
2007 11
2008 10
2009 12
2010 7
2011 13
2012 6
2013 10
2014 10
2015 6
2016 8
2017 6
2018 4
2019 7
2020 1
2021 4
Total 151
Download as CSV

Scott R. Klemmer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Klemmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 146
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott R. Klemmer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Klemmer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689 47
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Senior Member
  • 2008 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Scott R. Klemmer is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans several intersecting disciplines including Computer Science, Social Sciences, and Psychology, with a focus on applications in Computer Science, Education, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work primarily addresses topics related to online education, including Online Learning and Analytics, Online and Blended Learning, and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled Adjacent Display of Relevant Discussion Helps Resolve Confusion, published in 2021 in the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. This paper explores mechanisms for improving learner comprehension by using adjacent displays of discussion content.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Matin Yarmand
  • Srishti Palani

Their research has appeared predominantly in the Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction.

Klemmer has been recognized with distinctions such as:

  • ACM Senior Member in 2013
  • Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2008

Best Publications

  • How bodies matter: five themes for interaction design

    Scott R. Klemmer;Björn Hartmann;Leila Takayama

  • Peer and self assessment in massive online classes

    Chinmay Kulkarni;Koh Pang Wei;Huy Le;Daniel Chia

  • Two studies of opportunistic programming: interleaving web foraging, learning, and writing code

    Joel Brandt;Philip J. Guo;Joel Lewenstein;Mira Dontcheva

  • Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy

    Steven P. Dow;Alana Glassco;Jonathan Kass;Melissa Schwarz

  • Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis

    Björn Hartmann;Scott R. Klemmer;Michael Bernstein;Leith Abdulla

  • Shepherding the crowd yields better work

    Steven Dow;Anand Kulkarni;Scott Klemmer;Björn Hartmann

  • Example-centric programming: integrating web search into the development environment

    Joel Brandt;Mira Dontcheva;Marcos Weskamp;Scott R. Klemmer

  • The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site

    Scott R. Klemmer;Mark W. Newman;Ryan Farrell;Mark Bilezikjian

  • Suede: a Wizard of Oz prototyping tool for speech user interfaces

    Scott R. Klemmer;Anoop K. Sinha;Jack Chen;James A. Landay

  • Papier-Mache: toolkit support for tangible input

    Scott R. Klemmer;Jack Li;James Lin;James A. Landay

  • What would other programmers do: suggesting solutions to error messages

    Björn Hartmann;Daniel MacDougall;Joel Brandt;Scott R. Klemmer

  • ButterflyNet: a mobile capture and access system for field biology research

    Ron Yeh;Chunyuan Liao;Scott Klemmer;François Guimbretière

  • The efficacy of prototyping under time constraints

    Steven P. Dow;Kate Heddleston;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Where do web sites come from?: capturing and interacting with design history

    Scott R. Klemmer;Michael Thomsen;Ethan Phelps-Goodman;Robert Lee

  • Authoring sensor-based interactions by demonstration with direct manipulation and pattern recognition

    Björn Hartmann;Leith Abdulla;Manas Mittal;Scott R. Klemmer

  • PeerStudio: Rapid Peer Feedback Emphasizes Revision and Improves Performance

    Chinmay E. Kulkarni;Michael S. Bernstein;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Prototyping dynamics: sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results

    Steven Dow;Julie Fortuna;Dan Schwartz;Beth Altringer

  • Designing with interactive example galleries

    Brian Lee;Savil Srivastava;Ranjitha Kumar;Ronen Brafman

  • Bricolage: example-based retargeting for web design

    Ranjitha Kumar;Jerry O. Talton;Salman Ahmad;Scott R. Klemmer

  • Hacking, Mashing, Gluing: Understanding Opportunistic Design

    B. Hartmann;S. Doorley;S.R. Klemmer

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Landay
James A. Landay Stanford University
Björn Hartmann
Björn Hartmann University of California, Berkeley
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Steven Dow
Steven Dow University of California, San Diego
Philip J. Guo
Philip J. Guo University of California, San Diego
Daniel M. Russell
Daniel M. Russell University of Zurich
Rob Knight
Rob Knight University of California, San Diego
Andreas Paepcke
Andreas Paepcke Stanford University
Wendy Ju
Wendy Ju Cornell University
Daniel L. Schwartz
Daniel L. Schwartz Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Computer Science opens the door to many related online degrees and career opportunities. Prospective students often search for affordable options, as cost is a major concern. Those interested in a broad introduction should explore the cheapest online bachelor degree programs to find flexible and budget-friendly ways to start their education journey.

For those wanting a technical edge, choosing the cheapest engineering degree is a great pathway to develop hands-on skills relevant to the tech industry. Aspiring leaders who hope to move into management roles may benefit from the affordable online executive mba programs, which provide essential business acumen alongside technical expertise.

Additionally, those interested in the intersection of technology and information science can look into the cheapest mlis degree online. This degree prepares graduates for roles in data management, digital libraries, and information systems. Each pathway offers unique benefits, and finding the right, affordable option can set the stage for a successful tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. Klemmer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles