World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel M. Russell

Daniel M. Russell

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
4342
World Ranking
14031
National Ranking
224

Daniel M. Russell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Russell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 106 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Daniel M. Russell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel M. Russell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel M. Russell is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Health Professions, Computer Science, and Social Sciences. These areas include notable subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, and Health.

Their scholarship covers various topics including Misinformation and Its Impacts, Health Literacy and Information Accessibility, COVID-19 and Mental Health, Speech and Dialogue Systems, Topic Modeling, Natural Language Processing Techniques, and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy.

Recent publications by Daniel M. Russell include:

  • Relationship Between Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-Based Survey Study, 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Online Search Behavior Related to COVID-19 Vaccines: Infodemiology Study, 2021, JMIR Infodemiology
  • Report on the future conversations workshop at CHIIR 2021, 2021, ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Discovering Datasets on the Web Scale: Challenges and Recommendations for Google Dataset Search, 2024, Harvard Data Science Review
  • Incorporating Social Determinants of Health Training in Curricula of Physical Therapist Professional Education Programs: A Qualitative Analysis of Faculty Approaches, 2025, Journal of Physical Therapy Education

The frequent co-authors with whom Daniel M. Russell has collaborated multiple times include:

  • Lawrence C. An
  • Elizabeth Bacon
  • Scott B. Huffman
  • Ken Resnicow
  • Sarah T. Hawley

Their work has appeared in several publication venues, among which the most frequent are:

  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • ACM SIGIR Forum
  • JMIR Infodemiology
  • Harvard Data Science Review
  • Journal of Physical Therapy Education

Best Publications

  • The cost structure of sensemaking

    Daniel M. Russell;Mark J. Stefik;Peter Pirolli;Stuart K. Card

  • Document processing system utilizing document service cards to provide document processing services

    Mark J. Stefik;Daniel M. Russell;Daniel G. Bobrow;D. Austin Henderson

  • An eye tracking study of how pictures influence online reading

    David Beymer;Peter Z. Orton;Daniel M. Russell

  • Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines

    D. A. Norman;A. Ortony;D. M. Russell

  • Web notebook tools

    Bay-Wei Chang;Kushal Dave;Robert Allen Ryskamp;Xiangtian Dai

  • Public and Situated Displays: Social and Interactional Aspects of Shared Display Technologies

    K. O'Hara;M. Perry;E. Churchill;D. Russell

  • Introduction to this Special Issue on Sensemaking

    Peter Pirolli;Daniel M. Russell

  • System and method for visualizing and navigating content in a graphical user interface

    Andreas Dieberger;Dulce Beatriz Ponceleon;Daniel Martin Russell

  • Understanding User Behavior Through Log Data and Analysis

    Susan T. Dumais;Robin Jeffries;Daniel M. Russell;Diane Tang

  • Building disappearing computers

    Daniel M. Russell;Norbert A. Streitz;Terry Winograd

  • Social Aspects of Using Large Public Interactive Displays for Collaboration

    Daniel M. Russell;Clemens Drews;Alison Sue

  • Generative design rationale: beyond the record and replay paradigm

    Thomas R. Gruber;Daniel M. Russell

  • Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC

    Julia Wilkowski;Amit Deutsch;Daniel M. Russell

  • WebGazeAnalyzer: a system for capturing and analyzing web reading behavior using eye gaze

    David Beymer;Daniel M. Russell

  • Social Aspects of Using Large Public Interactive Displays for Collaboration

    Unknown

  • IM here: public instant messaging on large, shared displays for workgroup interactions

    Elaine M. Huang;Daniel M. Russell;Alison E. Sue

  • An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading

    David Beymer;Daniel Russell;Peter Orton

  • Making sense of sensemaking

    George W. Furnas;Daniel M. Russell

  • On the Design of Personal & Communal Large Information Scale Appliances

    Daniel M. Russell;Rich Gossweiler

  • Session Viewer: Visual Exploratory Analysis of Web Session Logs

    H. Lam;D. Russell;D. Tang;T. Munzner

  • Secrets to success and fatal flaws: the design of large-display groupware

    E.M. Huang;E.D. Mynatt;D.M. Russell;A.E. Sue

  • Sensemaking

    Unknown

  • Query logs alone are not enough

    Carrie Grimes;Diane Tang;Daniel M. Russell

  • Ubiquitous Electronic Tagging

    Roy Want;Daniel M. Russell

  • Facilitating the development of representations in hypertext with IDE

    D. S. Jordan;D. M. Russell;A.-M. S. Jensen;R. A. Rogers

  • Planning and understanding: A computational approach to human reasoning: R. Wilensky, (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983); 157 pages, $25.00

    Daniel M. Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Allison Druin
Allison Druin University of Maryland, College Park
Malcolm Slaney
Malcolm Slaney Stanford University
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Jaime Teevan
Jaime Teevan Microsoft (United States)
Scott R. Klemmer
Scott R. Klemmer University of California, San Diego
Stuart K. Card
Stuart K. Card Stanford University
Peter Pirolli
Peter Pirolli Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Ed H. Chi
Ed H. Chi Google (United States)
Susan T. Dumais
Susan T. Dumais Microsoft (United States)
Mark J. Stefik
Mark J. Stefik Palo Alto Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s valuable to consider related online degrees and alternative career pathways. Online learning offers flexibility, affordability, and access to high-quality education in a range of fields closely linked to computer science.

For example, online physics degrees combine foundational scientific theory with practical problem-solving, often complementing skills developed in computer science. Meanwhile, many choose to specialize further with data science programs, which focus on analytics, machine learning, and big data—key areas driving tech innovation.

Engineering-minded students may find a strong fit in the best online electrical engineering programs USA, where courses cover circuitry, robotics, and embedded systems—fields that frequently overlap with computer science. If you’re looking for faster entry into the tech workforce, there are also easy certifications to get online that pay well and can boost your résumé quickly.

Exploring these related options can help diversify your education, enhance your skills, and open doors to a broader range of tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel M. Russell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles