World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
29321
World Ranking
4177
National Ranking
1971

Mark J. Stefik publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Stefik sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 205 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mark J. Stefik D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Stefik sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1990 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)

Overview

Mark J. Stefik is affiliated with SRI International in the United States. Their research primarily resides within the field of Computer Science, with notable focus areas including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Automotive Engineering, Health Informatics, and Safety Research.

The scientist's recent publications reflect a concentration on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), advanced neural network applications, autonomous vehicle technology and safety, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, and ethics and social impacts of AI. These topics are represented across multiple papers spanning from 2021 to projections into 2025.

  • Explaining autonomous drones: An XAI journey, 2021, Applied AI Letters
  • Bootstrapping Developmental AIs: From Simple Competences to Intelligent Human-Compatible AIs, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Roots and Requirements for Collaborative AIs, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • What AIs are not Learning (and Why), 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • What AIs are not learning (and why), 2025, AI Magazine

Mark J. Stefik has collaborated frequently with Robert L. Price, with two joint publications. Other collaborators include G. Michael Youngblood, Peter Pirolli, Christian Lebière, and Robert Thomson.

  • Robert L. Price
  • G. Michael Youngblood
  • Peter Pirolli
  • Christian Lebière
  • Robert Thomson

The scientist's work has appeared predominantly in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University) with three publications, alongside contributions to Applied AI Letters and AI Magazine.

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Applied AI Letters
  • AI Magazine

Mark J. Stefik has been recognized by their peers with fellowships awarded by the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1997 and the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) in 1990.

Best Publications

  • XAI—Explainable artificial intelligence

    David Gunning;Mark Stefik;Jaesik Choi;Timothy Miller

  • System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works

    Mark J. Stefik;Peter L. T. Pirolli

  • System for controlling the distribution and use of digital works having attached usage rights where the usage rights are defined by a usage rights grammar

    Mark J. Stefik

  • Beyond the chalkboard: computer support for collaboration and problem solving in meetings

    Mark Stefik;Gregg Foster;Daniel G. Bobrow;Kenneth Kahn

  • Object-oriented programming: themes and variations

    M. J. Stefik;D. G. Bobrow

  • System and method for permitting use of content

    Mark J. Stefik;Peter L.T. Pirolli

  • Planning with constraints

    Mark Jeffrey Stefik

  • SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING USE AND DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL WORK HAVING FEE REPORTING MECHANISM

    Stefik Mark J;Merkle Ralph C;Pirolli Peter L T

  • CONTROL SYSTEM FOR ACCESS TO AND USE OF COMPOUND DIGITAL WORK

    Stefik Mark J;Bobrow Daniel G;Pirolli Peter L T

  • The cost structure of sensemaking

    Daniel M. Russell;Mark J. Stefik;Peter Pirolli;Stuart K. Card

  • WYSIWIS revised: early experiences with multiuser interfaces

    M. Stefik;D. G. Bobrow;G. Foster;S. Lanning

  • Introduction to knowledge systems

    Mark Stefik

  • System and method for providing distributed on-street valet parking with the aid of a digital computer

    Mark Jeffrey Stefik;Alan G. Bell;Craig Eldershaw;Lance E. Good

  • Method for accessing digital document in transportable storage device

    Daniel G Bobrow;Stuart K Card;Michalene M Casey;Richard J Goldstein

  • System for controlling the distribution and use of rendered digital works through watermarking

    Mark J. Stefik;Glen W. Petrie;Steve A. Okamoto;Nicholas H. Briggs

  • Planning and meta-planning (MOLGEN: Part 2)

    Mark Stefik

  • CommonLoops: merging Lisp and object-oriented programming

    Daniel G. Bobrow;Kenneth Kahn;Gregor Kiczales;Larry Masinter

  • The organization of expert systems, a tutorial☆

    Mark Stefik;Jan Aikins;Robert Balzer;John Benoit

  • Expert systems: perils and promise

    D. G. Bobrow;S. Mittal;M. J. Stefik

  • Method and system for providing search based on topic

    Stuart K Card;Lichan Hong;Peter L Pirolli;Mark J Stefik

  • V. Braitenberg, Vehicles: Experiments in Synthetic Psychology.

    Mark J. Stefik

  • Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach: R.S. Michalski, J.G. Carbonell and T.M. Mitchell, (Tioga, Palo Alto, CA); 572 pages, $39.50

    Mark J. Stefik

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel H. Greene
Daniel H. Greene Palo Alto Research Center
Daniel G. Bobrow
Daniel G. Bobrow Palo Alto Research Center
Daniel M. Russell
Daniel M. Russell University of Zurich
Lichan Hong
Lichan Hong Google (United States)
Stuart K. Card
Stuart K. Card Stanford University
Jock D. Mackinlay
Jock D. Mackinlay Tableau Software (United States)
Thomas M. Breuel
Thomas M. Breuel Nvidia (United States)
Peter Pirolli
Peter Pirolli Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
Ed H. Chi
Ed H. Chi Google (United States)
Lawrence A. Birnbaum
Lawrence A. Birnbaum Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for computer science professionals continues to grow, students have more flexible and diverse pathways to launch their tech careers. A great starting point is pursuing an associate degree online. This program can provide foundational skills in programming, networking, or cybersecurity—often in as little as two years.

For those seeking promotions or highly specialized roles, an advanced degree can be a smart investment. If time is a concern, consider the shortest masters degree programs online. These accelerated programs can allow you to earn a respected qualification in just 12-18 months.

To maximize your earning potential, explore masters degrees that are worth it. Many of these degrees focus on in-demand fields such as data science, artificial intelligence, and software engineering.

Don’t overlook the impact of industry credentials. Many professionals boost their job prospects and salaries with certifications for jobs—short, specialized programs ideal for proving your expertise in key technologies.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Stefik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles