World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
14761
World Ranking
4020
National Ranking
1916

Marcus Peinado publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Peinado sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 141 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marcus Peinado D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcus Peinado sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcus Peinado is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States and contributes actively to the field of computer science, with a focus on security and verification in computing as well as advanced malware detection techniques. Their work spans multiple subfields including artificial intelligence, signal processing, information systems, and computer networks and communications.

Peinado's research output includes publications in notable venues such as the 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) and Digital Threats Research and Practice. Two recent papers illustrate the scope and direction of their work:

  • HARDLOG: Practical Tamper-Proof System Auditing Using a Novel Audit Device, 2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • Spacelord: Private and Secure Smart Space Sharing, 2023, Digital Threats Research and Practice

The topics covered by their publications include:

  • Security and Verification in Computing
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Digital and Cyber Forensics
  • Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks

Frequent coauthors contributing to Peinado's research include Sangho Lee, Adil M. Ahmad, Yechan Bae, and Sarbartha Banerjee, indicating collaboration across various projects and publications.

The primary fields of study attributed to Peinado are computer science and several of its important subfields, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Signal Processing
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications

The publication venues that have featured Peinado's work are:

  • 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)
  • Digital Threats Research and Practice

Marcus Peinado's research is focused on addressing challenges in system auditing, privacy, and secure sharing in digital environments, contributing findings that intersect both theoretical and applied dimensions within computer science. The presence of work on tamper-proof auditing and secure smart space sharing highlights an emphasis on practical security solutions.

Best Publications

  • Shielding Applications from an Untrusted Cloud with Haven

    Andrew Baumann;Marcus Peinado;Galen Hunt

  • Controlled-Channel Attacks: Deterministic Side Channels for Untrusted Operating Systems

    Yuanzhong Xu;Weidong Cui;Marcus Peinado

  • VC3: Trustworthy Data Analytics in the Cloud Using SGX

    Felix Schuster;Manuel Costa;Cedric Fournet;Christos Gkantsidis

  • Binding a digital license to a portable device or the like in a digital rights management (DRM) system and checking out/checking in the digital license to/from the portable device or the like

    Marcus Peinado

  • Digital rights management system operating on computing device and having black box tied to computing device

    Marcus Peinado;Donna Liu;Krishnamurthy Ganesan

  • Shielding applications from an untrusted cloud with Haven

    Andrew Baumann;Marcus Peinado;Galen Hunt

  • Inferring fine-grained control flow inside SGX enclaves with branch shadowing

    Sangho Lee;Ming-Wei Shih;Prasun Gera;Taesoo Kim

  • T-SGX: Eradicating Controlled-Channel Attacks Against Enclave Programs.

    Ming-Wei Shih;Sangho Lee;Taesoo Kim;Marcus Peinado

  • Secure processor architecture for use with a digital rights management (DRM) system on a computing device

    Marcus Peinado;Paul England

  • Rendering digital content in an encrypted rights-protected form

    Marcus Peinado;John L. Manferdelli;Jeffrey R. C. Bell

  • STEALTHMEM: system-level protection against cache-based side channel attacks in the cloud

    Taesoo Kim;Marcus Peinado;Gloria Mainar-Ruiz

  • Structure of digital rights management (drm) system

    Marcus Peinado;Rajasekhar Abburi;Jeffrey R. C. Bell

  • Malware investigation by analyzing computer memory

    Marcus Peinado;Weidong Cui

  • A trusted open platform

    P. England;B. Lampson;J. Manferdelli;B. Willman

  • Tupni: automatic reverse engineering of input formats

    Weidong Cui;Marcus Peinado;Karl Chen;Helen J. Wang

  • Fast byte-granularity software fault isolation

    Miguel Castro;Manuel Costa;Jean-Philippe Martin;Marcus Peinado

  • 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy SP 2015

    Jonathan Woodruff;Peter G. Neumann;Simon W. Moore;Jonathan Anderson

  • The Darknet and the Future of Content Distribution

    Peter Biddle;Paul England;Marcus Peinado;Bryan Willman

  • Mapping kernel objects to enable systematic integrity checking

    Martim Carbone;Weidong Cui;Long Lu;Wenke Lee

  • Bouncer: securing software by blocking bad input

    Manuel Costa;Miguel Castro;Lidong Zhou;Lintao Zhang

  • Digital license and method for obtaining/providing a digital license

    Marcus Peinado;Rajasekhar Abburi;Paul England;Krishnamurthy Ganesan

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul England
Paul England Microsoft (United States)
Galen C. Hunt
Galen C. Hunt Microsoft (United States)
Ramarathnam Venkatesan
Ramarathnam Venkatesan Microsoft (United States)
Josh Benaloh
Josh Benaloh Microsoft (United States)
Taesoo Kim
Taesoo Kim Georgia Institute of Technology
Thomas Lengauer
Thomas Lengauer Max Planck Institute for Informatics
Miguel Castro
Miguel Castro Microsoft (United States)
David Heckerman
David Heckerman Microsoft (United States)
Christos Gkantsidis
Christos Gkantsidis Microsoft (United States)
Christopher A. Meek
Christopher A. Meek Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to exciting and flexible career opportunities in technology and science fields. A bachelor of science in physics online gives you a strong foundation in analytical thinking, problem-solving, and technical skills—qualities highly valued across tech industries.

If you’re interested in big data, consider data science degrees, which prepare graduates for roles in data analysis, machine learning, and AI, all of which are in high demand in the USA. Similarly, pursuing online electrical engineering career outcomes can lead to work in sectors like electronics, telecommunications, and automation, with many companies now seeking engineers who have online or hybrid learning backgrounds.

For those looking for a shorter route into the workforce, some short certificate programs that pay well can jumpstart your career. These certifications often provide specialized skills that employers need, getting you job-ready more quickly than traditional degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Marcus Peinado

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles