World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
7108
World Ranking
12435
National Ranking
790

Rosemary Luckin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemary Luckin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rosemary Luckin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemary Luckin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rosemary Luckin is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on computer science, social sciences, and psychology. Within these broader disciplines, their work touches on subfields including computer science applications, developmental and educational psychology, education, management science and operations research, and artificial intelligence.

Their scholarly output addresses various topics related to learning and technology. Key research subjects include online learning and analytics, educational strategies and epistemologies, student assessment and feedback, complex systems and decision making, cognitive science and mapping, information systems theories and implementation, and online and blended learning.

Rosemary Luckin has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications. One recent paper is "Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future," published in 2024 in Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal. This paper has received citations reflecting engagement in the academic community.

They have frequently published in the journal Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal. Their research collaborations include working multiple times with coauthors Mutlu Cukurova, Carmel Kent, Ibrahim Bashir, Benedict du Boulay, and Margaret Bearman.

  • Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future (2024), Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal

  • Mutlu Cukurova
  • Carmel Kent
  • Ibrahim Bashir
  • Benedict du Boulay
  • Margaret Bearman

  • Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal

Best Publications

  • Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education

    R Luckin;W Holmes

  • “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science

    Lucinda Kerawalla;Rosemary Luckin;Simon Seljeflot;Adrian Woolard

  • Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner-Centred Ecologies

    Rosemary Luckin

  • Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners

    Wilma Clark;Kit Logan;Rosemary Luckin;Adrian Mee

  • Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences‐driven approach

    Rosemary Luckin;Mutlu Cukurova

  • Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students

    Rosemary Luckin;Wilma Clark;Rebecca Graber;Kit Logan

  • The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning

    Rosemary Luckin

  • Decoding learning:the proof, promise and potential of digital education

    Rosemary Luckin;Brett Bligh;Andrew Manches;Shaaron Ainsworth

  • Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK

    Cathy Lewin;Rosemary Luckin

  • Ecolab: the development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework

    Rosemary Luckin;B. du Boulay

  • Machine Learning and Human Intelligence: The Future of Education for the 21st Century

    Rosemary Luckin

  • Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision-making: A case study in debate tutoring

    Mutlu Cukurova;Carmel Kent;Rosemary Luckin

  • Learning analytics and AI: Politics, pedagogy and practices

    Simon J. Buckingham Shum;Rosemary Luckin

  • Modelling Human Teaching Tactics and Strategies for Tutoring Systems: 14 Years On

    Benedict du Boulay;Rosemary Luckin

  • Designing multimedia for learning: narrative guidance and narrative construction

    Lydia Plowman;Rosemary Luckin;Diana Laurillard;Matthew Stratfold

  • Using Mobile Technology to Create Flexible Learning Contexts

    Rosemary Luckin;Benedict du Boulay;Hilary Smith;Joshua Underwood

  • Towards Systems That Care: A Conceptual Framework based on Motivation, Metacognition and Affect

    Benedict du Boulay;Katerina Avramides;Rosemary Luckin;Erika Martínez-Mirón

  • Exploring affective technologies for the classroom with the subtle stone

    Madeline Balaam;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Judith Good;Rosemary Luckin

  • Getting to Know Me: Helping Learners Understand Their Own Learning Needs through Metacognitive Scaffolding

    Rosemary Luckin;Louise Hammerton

  • Motivating the learner: an empirical evaluation

    Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez;Benedict du Boulay;Rosemary Luckin

  • Children's interactions with interactive toy technology

    Rosemary Luckin;D. Connolly;Lydia Plowman;S. Airey

  • Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home

    Rosemary Luckin;Danae Stanton Fraser

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Yuill
Nicola Yuill University of Sussex
Lydia Plowman
Lydia Plowman University of Edinburgh
Martin Oliver
Martin Oliver University College London
Peter Goodyear
Peter Goodyear University of Sydney
Kenneth R. Koedinger
Kenneth R. Koedinger Carnegie Mellon University
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Friedrich W. Hesse
Friedrich W. Hesse Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Chee-Kit Looi
Chee-Kit Looi Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of flexible, affordable study options. Many students seek cheap online colleges to reduce costs, making higher education more accessible without sacrificing quality. Those with a lower undergraduate GPA can still advance their studies, thanks to reputable online graduate schools with low GPA requirements that provide alternative pathways to earning a master's degree.

Additionally, computer science graduates are not limited to traditional tech roles. Careers blend with interdisciplinary fields, such as those pursued with jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, creating opportunities at the intersection of education, tech, and sustainability. For those eager to enter the workforce quickly or change careers, fast track computer science degree options offer intensive programs that can be completed in a shorter time frame.

No matter your background or goals, online learning in computer science offers numerous options for diverse interests and career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Rosemary Luckin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles