World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 33 12435 12073 790 777 143 7108

Rosemary Luckin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rosemary Luckin between 1996 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rosemary Luckin published across 29 years, from 1996 to 2024, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2005. 3 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2005. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 10 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 6 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication
1996 2024

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rosemary Luckin: publications per year, 1996 to 2024
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 5
1999 5
2000 1
2001 10
2002 6
2003 9
2004 8
2005 16
2006 8
2007 8
2008 14
2009 9
2010 9
2011 9
2012 5
2013 10
2014 2
2015 1
2016 6
2017 1
2018 6
2019 5
2020 2
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
2024 1
Total 161
Download as CSV

Rosemary Luckin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemary Luckin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 142–151 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 143 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609 143
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Rosemary Luckin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rosemary Luckin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983 33
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rosemary Luckin is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on computer science, social sciences, and psychology. Within these broader disciplines, their work touches on subfields including computer science applications, developmental and educational psychology, education, management science and operations research, and artificial intelligence.

Their scholarly output addresses various topics related to learning and technology. Key research subjects include online learning and analytics, educational strategies and epistemologies, student assessment and feedback, complex systems and decision making, cognitive science and mapping, information systems theories and implementation, and online and blended learning.

Rosemary Luckin has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications. One recent paper is "Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future," published in 2024 in Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal. This paper has received citations reflecting engagement in the academic community.

They have frequently published in the journal Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal. Their research collaborations include working multiple times with coauthors Mutlu Cukurova, Carmel Kent, Ibrahim Bashir, Benedict du Boulay, and Margaret Bearman.

  • Nurturing human intelligence in the age of AI: rethinking education for the future (2024), Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal

  • Mutlu Cukurova
  • Carmel Kent
  • Ibrahim Bashir
  • Benedict du Boulay
  • Margaret Bearman

  • Development in Learning Organizations An International Journal

Best Publications

  • Intelligence Unleashed: An argument for AI in Education

    R Luckin;W Holmes

  • “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science

    Lucinda Kerawalla;Rosemary Luckin;Simon Seljeflot;Adrian Woolard

  • Re-Designing Learning Contexts: Technology-Rich, Learner-Centred Ecologies

    Rosemary Luckin

  • Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners

    Wilma Clark;Kit Logan;Rosemary Luckin;Adrian Mee

  • Designing educational technologies in the age of AI: A learning sciences‐driven approach

    Rosemary Luckin;Mutlu Cukurova

  • Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students

    Rosemary Luckin;Wilma Clark;Rebecca Graber;Kit Logan

  • The learner centric ecology of resources: A framework for using technology to scaffold learning

    Rosemary Luckin

  • Decoding learning:the proof, promise and potential of digital education

    Rosemary Luckin;Brett Bligh;Andrew Manches;Shaaron Ainsworth

  • Technology to support parental engagement in elementary education: Lessons learned from the UK

    Cathy Lewin;Rosemary Luckin

  • Ecolab: the development and evaluation of a Vygotskian design framework

    Rosemary Luckin;B. du Boulay

  • Machine Learning and Human Intelligence: The Future of Education for the 21st Century

    Rosemary Luckin

  • Artificial intelligence and multimodal data in the service of human decision-making: A case study in debate tutoring

    Mutlu Cukurova;Carmel Kent;Rosemary Luckin

  • Learning analytics and AI: Politics, pedagogy and practices

    Simon J. Buckingham Shum;Rosemary Luckin

  • Modelling Human Teaching Tactics and Strategies for Tutoring Systems: 14 Years On

    Benedict du Boulay;Rosemary Luckin

  • Designing multimedia for learning: narrative guidance and narrative construction

    Lydia Plowman;Rosemary Luckin;Diana Laurillard;Matthew Stratfold

  • Using Mobile Technology to Create Flexible Learning Contexts

    Rosemary Luckin;Benedict du Boulay;Hilary Smith;Joshua Underwood

  • Towards Systems That Care: A Conceptual Framework based on Motivation, Metacognition and Affect

    Benedict du Boulay;Katerina Avramides;Rosemary Luckin;Erika Martínez-Mirón

  • Exploring affective technologies for the classroom with the subtle stone

    Madeline Balaam;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Judith Good;Rosemary Luckin

  • Getting to Know Me: Helping Learners Understand Their Own Learning Needs through Metacognitive Scaffolding

    Rosemary Luckin;Louise Hammerton

  • Motivating the learner: an empirical evaluation

    Genaro Rebolledo-Mendez;Benedict du Boulay;Rosemary Luckin

  • Children's interactions with interactive toy technology

    Rosemary Luckin;D. Connolly;Lydia Plowman;S. Airey

  • Limitless or pointless? An evaluation of augmented reality technology in the school and home

    Rosemary Luckin;Danae Stanton Fraser

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicola Yuill
Nicola Yuill University of Sussex
Lydia Plowman
Lydia Plowman University of Edinburgh
Martin Oliver
Martin Oliver University College London
Peter Goodyear
Peter Goodyear University of Sydney
Kenneth R. Koedinger
Kenneth R. Koedinger Carnegie Mellon University
Steve Benford
Steve Benford University of Nottingham
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis
Friedrich W. Hesse
Friedrich W. Hesse Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology
Chee-Kit Looi
Chee-Kit Looi Nanyang Technological University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up a range of flexible, affordable study options. Many students seek cheap online colleges to reduce costs, making higher education more accessible without sacrificing quality. Those with a lower undergraduate GPA can still advance their studies, thanks to reputable online graduate schools with low GPA requirements that provide alternative pathways to earning a master's degree.

Additionally, computer science graduates are not limited to traditional tech roles. Careers blend with interdisciplinary fields, such as those pursued with jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree, creating opportunities at the intersection of education, tech, and sustainability. For those eager to enter the workforce quickly or change careers, fast track computer science degree options offer intensive programs that can be completed in a shorter time frame.

No matter your background or goals, online learning in computer science offers numerous options for diverse interests and career paths.

Best Scientists Citing Rosemary Luckin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles