World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Geraldine Fitzpatrick

Geraldine Fitzpatrick

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
11952
World Ranking
4093
National Ranking
27

Geraldine Fitzpatrick publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geraldine Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 286 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Geraldine Fitzpatrick D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geraldine Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Geraldine Fitzpatrick is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has contributed primarily to the field of Computer Science. Their research encompasses several subfields, particularly Human-Computer Interaction, Museology, Demography, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their main research interests focus on Innovative Human-Technology Interaction, with considerable work in Persona Design and Applications, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Crafts, Textile, and Design, Technology Use by Older Adults, as well as Educational Games and Gamification.

Recent publications include:

  • The Matter of Tools, 2021, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • What Do You Mean by Trust? Establishing Shared Meaning in Interdisciplinary Design for Assistive Technology, 2021, International Journal of Social Robotics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Geraldine Fitzpatrick are:

  • Irene Posch
  • Isabel Schwaninger
  • Florian Güldenpfennig
  • Astrid Weiss
  • Matthias Wünsch

Their research work has been published notably in journals such as:

  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • International Journal of Social Robotics

Geraldine Fitzpatrick received the ACM Distinguished Member award in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

    Karrie Karahalios;Andrés Monroy-Hernández;Airi Lampinen;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • A Review of 25 Years of CSCW Research in Healthcare: Contributions, Challenges and Future Agendas

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Gunnar Ellingsen

  • Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors

    Y. Rogers;S. Price;G. Fitzpatrick;R. Fleck

  • Dashboards for improving patient care: review of the literature

    Dawn Dowding;Rebecca Randell;Peter Gardner;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • Ubi-learning integrates indoor and outdoor experiences

    Yvonne Rogers;Sara Price;Cliff Randell;Danae Stanton Fraser

  • Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape

    Rowanne Fleck;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design

    Eva Ganglbauer;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Rob Comber

  • In pursuit of rigour and accountability in participatory design

    Christopher Frauenberger;Judith Good;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Ole Sejer Iversen

  • Agency of Autistic Children in Technology Research—A Critical Literature Review

    Katta Spiel;Christopher Frauenberger;Os Keyes;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • Physical spaces, virtual places and social worlds: a study of work in the virtual

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Simon Kaplan;Tim Mansfield

  • Work, locales and distributed social worlds

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick;William J. Tolone;Simon M. Kaplan

  • Augmenting the workaday world with Elvin

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Tim Mansfield;Simon Kaplan;David Arnold

  • The Locales Framework: Understanding and Designing for Wicked Problems

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • YouTube and intergenerational communication: the case of Geriatric1927

    Dave Harley;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • CHI '19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    S. Brewster;G. Fitzpatrick;A. Cox;V. Kostakos

  • The introduction of a shared interactive surface into a communal space

    Harry Brignull;Shahram Izadi;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Yvonne Rogers

  • Technology-Enabled Feedback on Domestic Energy Consumption: Articulating a Set of Design Concerns

    G. Fitzpatrick;G. Smith

  • Motivating mobility: designing for lived motivation in stroke rehabilitation

    Madeline Balaam;Stefan Rennick Egglestone;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Tom Rodden

  • Supporting Public Availability and Accessibility with Elvin: Experiences and Reflections

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Simon Kaplan;Tim Mansfield;Arnold David

  • Reflective Practicum: A Framework of Sensitising Concepts to Design for Transformative Reflection

    Petr Slovák;Christopher Frauenberger;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • HCI Methodology For Evaluating Musical Controllers: A Case Study

    Chris Kiefer;Nick Collins;Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • Evolving Orbit: a process report on building locales

    Tim Mansfield;Simon Kaplan;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Ted Phelps

  • Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Elizabeth Mynatt;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Scott Hudson;Keith Edwards

  • The Locales Framework

    Geraldine Fitzpatrick

  • MUDdling Through

    Simon M. Kaplan;Geraldine Fitzpatrick;Tim Mansfield;William J. Tolone

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark J. Weal
Mark J. Weal University of Southampton
Eva Hornecker
Eva Hornecker Bauhaus University, Weimar
Tom Rodden
Tom Rodden University of Nottingham
Yvonne Rogers
Yvonne Rogers University College London
John W. Halloran
John W. Halloran University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
David De Roure
David De Roure University of Oxford
Katta Spiel
Katta Spiel KU Leuven
Rosemary Luckin
Rosemary Luckin University College London
Jackie Cassell
Jackie Cassell Brighton and Sussex Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Computer Science opens up a wide range of online education and career opportunities across STEM fields. Closely related disciplines such as engineering, physics, and data science all offer affordable, flexible pathways for learners who want to enhance their technical skills and job prospects.

If you're interested in applying your computing knowledge to sustainability, consider an online environmental engineering degree. Those looking to expand their expertise can also explore the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering options, ideal for those wanting to advance in engineering roles.

For students passionate about foundational sciences, a bachelor of science in physics online program can provide a strong analytical background. Additionally, the field of data science is rapidly growing and offers competitive salaries; browse data science degrees for the most affordable options in the USA.

Each of these pathways builds on the problem-solving and technology skills developed in computer science, offering diverse and rewarding career possibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Geraldine Fitzpatrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles