World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
6355
World Ranking
4812
National Ranking
810

Jackie Cassell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jackie Cassell sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 341 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jackie Cassell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jackie Cassell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jackie Cassell is affiliated with Brighton and Sussex Medical School in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on health professions and medicine, with a notable emphasis on general health professions and clinical psychology. Additional subfields include health, infectious diseases, and microbiology.

Their work covers several main topics, including adolescent sexual and reproductive health, geriatric care and nursing homes, reproductive tract infections research, health disparities and outcomes, dermatological diseases and infestations, chronic disease management strategies, and HIV/AIDS research and interventions.

Recent papers by Jackie Cassell include:

  • Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens' jury study in the UK, 2020, Journal of Medical Ethics
  • Support for self-isolation is critical in covid-19 response, 2021, BMJ
  • Care home residents' quality of life and its association with CQC ratings and workforce issues: the MiCareHQ mixed-methods study, 2021, Health Services and Delivery Research
  • Automated detection of patients with dementia whose symptoms have been identified in primary care but have no formal diagnosis: a retrospective case-control study using electronic primary care records, 2021, BMJ Open
  • Health and well-being issues of Nepalese migrant workers in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries and Malaysia: a systematic review, 2020, BMJ Open

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Cassell include Paul Flowers, Jo Middleton, John Saunders, Fiona Mapp, and Oliver Stirrup.

Their research has appeared in several publication venues, notably bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), BMJ Open, BMJ, Sexually Transmitted Infections, and the British Journal of Health Psychology. The highest number of publications has been in bioRxiv and BMJ Open.

Best Publications

  • Extracting information from the text of electronic medical records to improve case detection: a systematic review.

    Elizabeth Ford;John A Carroll;Helen E Smith;Donia Scott

  • The impact of information transmission on epidemic outbreaks.

    Istvan Z. Kiss;Jackie Cassell;Mario Recker;Péter L. Simon

  • Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion.

    Julia V Bailey;Elizabeth Murray;Greta Rait;Catherine H Mercer

  • ‘MMR talk’ and vaccination choices: An ethnographic study in Brighton

    Mike Poltorak;Melissa Leach;James Fairhead;Jackie Cassell

  • Improved effectiveness of partner notification for patients with sexually transmitted infections: systematic review.

    Sven Trelle;Aijing Shang;Linda Nartey;Jackie A Cassell

  • Application of the COM-B model to barriers and facilitators to chlamydia testing in general practice for young people and primary care practitioners: a systematic review.

    Lorraine K McDonagh;Lorraine K McDonagh;John M Saunders;John M Saunders;Jackie Cassell;Jackie Cassell;Tyrone Curtis

  • Pragmatic randomised trials using routine electronic health records: putting them to the test

    Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa;Ben Goldacre;Martin Gulliford;Jackie Cassell

  • The opportunities and challenges of pragmatic point-of-care randomised trials using routinely collected electronic records: evaluations of two exemplar trials.

    Tjeerd-Pieter van Staa;Lisa Dyson;Gerard McCann;Shivani Padmanabhan

  • Scabies outbreaks in ten care homes for elderly people: a prospective study of clinical features, epidemiology, and treatment outcomes.

    Jackie A Cassell;Jackie A Cassell;Jo Middleton;Jo Middleton;Ananth Nalabanda;Stefania Lanza

  • National survey of British public's views on use of identifiable medical data by the National Cancer Registry

    Geraldine Barrett;Jackie A Cassell;Janet L Peacock;Michel P Coleman

  • “Giving something back”: A systematic review and ethical enquiry into public views on the use of patient data for research in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland

    Jessica Stockdale;Jessica Stockdale;Jackie Cassell;Elizabeth Ford

  • Why we should not seek individual informed consent for participation in health services research

    J. A. Cassell;A Young

  • Is the cultural context of MMR rejection a key to an effective public health discourse

    Jackie Cassell;M. Leach;M. S. Poltorak;C. H. Mercer

  • How much do delayed healthcare seeking, delayed care provision, and diversion from primary care contribute to the transmission of STIs?

    Catherine H Mercer;Lorna Sutcliffe;Anne M Johnson;Peter J White

  • Vicious and Virtuous Circles in the Dynamics of Infectious Disease and the Provision of Health Care: Gonorrhea in Britain as an Example

    Peter J. White;Helen Ward;Jackie A. Cassell;Catherine H. Mercer

  • Predicting dementia from primary care records: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Elizabeth Ford;Nicholas Greenslade;Priya Paudyal;Stephen Bremner

  • Trends in sexually transmitted infections in general practice 1990-2000: population based study using data from the UK general practice research database

    Jackie A Cassell;Catherine H Mercer;Lorna Sutcliffe;Irene Petersen

  • Scabies outbreaks in residential care homes: factors associated with late recognition, burden and impact. A mixed methods study in England

    K. A. Hewitt;A. Nalabanda;J. A. Cassell

  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of traditional and new partner notification technologies for curable sexually transmitted infections: observational study, systematic reviews and mathematical modelling

    Christian L Althaus;Katherine M E Turner;Catherine H Mercer;Peter Auguste

  • Sex differences in the experience of testing positive for genital chlamydia infection: a qualitative study with implications for public health and for a national screening programme.

    J. Darroch;L. Myers;J. A. Cassell

  • Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys

    Catherine R.H. Aicken;Catherine H. Mercer;Jackie A. Cassell

  • Genitourinary medicine: Not the most glamourous of specialties but you do get to hear some interesting stories. Jackie Cassell explains what drew her to the specialty, and how others may follow

    Jackie Cassell

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine H Mercer
Catherine H Mercer University College London
Andrew Copas
Andrew Copas University College London
Nicola Low
Nicola Low University of Bern
Liam Smeeth
Liam Smeeth London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Martin Gulliford
Martin Gulliford King's College London
Munir Pirmohamed
Munir Pirmohamed University of Liverpool
Anne M Johnson
Anne M Johnson University College London
Graham Hart
Graham Hart University College London
Paul Flowers
Paul Flowers University of Strathclyde
David J. Torgerson
David J. Torgerson University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Social Sciences and Humanities offers a variety of online degree options in the USA, designed for those looking to advance their careers or make a transition. Selecting the right program involves considering key factors like accreditation, flexibility, duration, and affordability.

For psychology professionals, online psych d programs can lead to clinical and counseling roles, while those seeking a quicker route to becoming a marriage and family therapist may benefit from accelerated online mft programs.

If cost is a concern, students can explore the best online masters in psychology, which balance academic excellence with budget. For educators aiming for leadership and administrative roles, accelerated doctoral programs in education online offer a fast-track to advanced credentials.

Choosing an online pathway lets you balance studies with work and personal commitments, making higher education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Jackie Cassell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles