World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
15093
World Ranking
3390
National Ranking
1306

Mark A. Finney publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Finney sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 181 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark A. Finney D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Finney sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Finney is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States, contributing extensively to the field of wildfire research and environmental science. Their work spans several interconnected areas focused on fire dynamics, ecosystem impacts, and risk mitigation strategies.

The scientist's recent papers cover a range of topics pertinent to fire behavior and wildfire management. These include:

  • Mass fire behavior created by extensive tree mortality and high tree density not predicted by operational fire behavior models in the southern Sierra Nevada, 2022, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Wildland-urban fire disasters aren't actually a wildfire problem, 2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Ecological techniques for wildfire mitigation: Two distinct fuelbreak approaches and their fusion, 2021, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Counteracting wildfire misinformation, 2022, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • The wildland fire system and challenges for engineering, 2020, Fire Safety Journal

Mark A. Finney has collaborated frequently with co-authors including Isaac C. Grenfell, Karin L. Riley, Karen C. Short, Torben P. Grumstrup, and Jason Forthofer, indicating a strong network in wildfire and environmental science research.

The scientist's work appears predominantly in several publication venues, with multiple articles in the Forest Service Research Data Archive, Fire Technology, Combustion Science and Technology, Forest Ecology and Management, and the International Journal of Wildland Fire.

Mark A. Finney's research contributes mainly to the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. The subfields of focus within these include Global and Planetary Change, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Ecology, Environmental Engineering, and Computational Mechanics.

The topics of their research emphasize:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Fire dynamics and safety research
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Fire Detection and Safety Systems
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Aeolian processes and effects

Best Publications

  • FARSITE : Fire Area Simulator : model development and evaluation

    Mark A. Finney

  • Design of regular landscape fuel treatment patterns for modifying fire growth and behavior

    Mark A. Finney

  • The use of shaded fuelbreaks in landscape fire management.

    James K. Agee;Bernie Bahro;Mark A. Finney;Philip N. Omi

  • An Overview of FlamMap Fire Modeling Capabilities

    Mark A. Finney

  • The challenge of quantitative risk analysis for wildland fire

    Mark A. Finney

  • How risk management can prevent future wildfire disasters in the wildland-urban interface

    David E. Calkin;Jack D. Cohen;Mark A. Finney;Matthew P. Thompson

  • Fire growth using minimum travel time methods

    Mark A Finney

  • A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States

    Mark A. Finney;Charles W. McHugh;Isaac C. Grenfell;Karin Lynn Riley

  • Drought, tree mortality, and wildfire in forests adapted to frequent fire

    Scott L Stephens;Brandon M Collins;Christopher J Fettig;Mark A Finney

  • A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure

    Alan A. Ager;Nicole M. Vaillant;Mark A. Finney

  • Simulation of long-term landscape-level fuel treatment effects on large wildfires

    Mark A. Finney;Rob C. Seli;Charles W. McHugh;Alan A. Ager

  • Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management

    David E Calkin;Matthew P Thompson;Mark A Finney

  • Role of buoyant flame dynamics in wildfire spread

    Mark A. Finney;Jack D. Cohen;Jason M. Forthofer;Sara S. McAllister

  • Stand- and landscape-level effects of prescribed burning on two Arizona wildfires

    Mark A. Finney;Charles W. McHugh;Isaac C. Grenfell

  • Prescribed fire mortality of Sierra Nevada mixed conifer tree species: effects of crown damage and forest floor combustion

    Scott L Stephens;Mark A Finney

  • On the need for a theory of wildland fire spread

    Mark A. Finney;Jack D. Cohen;Sara S. McAllister;W. Matt Jolly

  • Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA

    Alan A. Ager;Mark A. Finney;Becky K. Kerns;Helen Maffei

  • A Method for Ensemble Wildland Fire Simulation

    Mark A. Finney;Isaac C. Grenfell;Charles W. McHugh;Robert C. Seli

  • A computational method for optimising fuel treatment locations

    Mark A. Finney

  • Modeling containment of large wildfires using generalized linear mixed-model analysis

    Mark Finney;Isaac C. Grenfell;Charles W. McHugh

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan A. Ager
Alan A. Ager US Forest Service
Donatella Spano
Donatella Spano University of Sassari
David E. Calkin
David E. Calkin US Forest Service
James K. Agee
James K. Agee University of Washington
Pierpaolo Duce
Pierpaolo Duce National Research Council (CNR)
Marc-André Parisien
Marc-André Parisien Natural Resources Canada
Carol Miller
Carol Miller US Forest Service
Scott L. Stephens
Scott L. Stephens University of California, Berkeley
Martin E. Alexander
Martin E. Alexander Wild Rose Fire Behaviour
Zhiliang Zhu
Zhiliang Zhu United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Those seeking a smoother transition into higher education might consider the easiest bachelor's degree programs, which balance academic rigor with accessible coursework, allowing learners to build foundational knowledge before specializing.

Online programs in geoscience online degree offer an in-depth understanding of the Earth’s processes, which is crucial for careers in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation. These flexible programs often emphasize practical skills applicable to real-world environmental challenges.

Additionally, degrees in geographic information systems degree are essential for mastering spatial data analysis and mapping technologies. GIS expertise is increasingly in demand across sectors such as urban planning, environmental monitoring, and disaster management.

For those considering leadership roles or public service careers related to the environment, completing a one-year accelerated program like the mpa one year degree can provide valuable administrative and policy-making skills to effectively influence environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Finney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles