World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martin E. Alexander

Martin E. Alexander

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
42
Citations
7860
World Ranking
7339
National Ranking
326

Martin E. Alexander publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Alexander sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 122 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin E. Alexander D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin E. Alexander sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin E. Alexander is affiliated with Wild Rose Fire Behaviour in Canada and specializes in environmental science with a focus on fire dynamics and wildfire behavior. Their research spans several subfields including global and planetary change, management, monitoring, policy and law, ecology, safety, risk, reliability and quality, and nature and landscape conservation.

Their published work addresses topics related to fire effects on ecosystems, landslides and related hazards, rangeland and wildlife management, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, forest ecology and management, fire dynamics and safety research, and meteorological phenomena and simulations.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Martin E. Alexander include Miguel G. Cruz, Paulo M. Fernandes, Musa Kilinc, Daniel D. B. Perrakis, and Scott M. Frost. Their research has appeared primarily in these publication venues:

  • Fire
  • International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Ecological Informatics
  • The Forestry Chronicle

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Martin E. Alexander include:

  • Evaluating the 10% wind speed rule of thumb for estimating a wildfire's forward rate of spread against an extensive independent set of observations, 2020, Environmental Modelling & Software
  • Evidence for lack of a fuel effect on forest and shrubland fire rates of spread under elevated fire danger conditions: implications for modelling and management, 2022, International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • Wildfire Rates of Spread in Grasslands under Critical Burning Conditions, 2022, Fire
  • Improved logistic models of crown fire probability in Canadian conifer forests, 2023, International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • The Application of Fire Behavior Modeling to Fuel Treatment Assessments at Army Garrison Camp Williams, Utah, 2022, Fire

Best Publications

  • Calculating and interpreting forest fire intensities

    Martin E. Alexander

  • Canadian Forest Fire Danger Rating System: An Overview

    B. J. Stocks;T. J. Lynham;B. D. Lawson;M. E. Alexander

  • Fire on Earth: An Introduction

    Andrew C. Scott;David M. J. S. Bowman;William J. Bond;Stephen J. Pyne

  • Science, technology, and human factors in fire danger rating: the Canadian experience

    Stephen W. Taylor;Martin E. Alexander

  • Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America

    Miguel G. Cruz;Martin E. Alexander;Ronald H. Wakimoto

  • Assessing crown fire potential in coniferous forests of western North America: a critique of current approaches and recent simulation studies.

    Miguel G. Cruz;Miguel G. Cruz;Martin E. Alexander;Martin E. Alexander

  • Information systems in support of wildland fire management decision making in Canada

    B.S Lee;M.E Alexander;B.C Hawkes;T.J Lynham

  • Fire, climate change, carbon and fuel management in the Canadian boreal forest

    B.D. Amiro;B.J. Stocks;M.E. Alexander;Flannigan

  • Development and testing of models for predicting crown fire rate of spread in conifer forest stands

    Miguel G Cruz;Martin E Alexander;Ronald H Wakimoto

  • Crown fire behaviour in a northern jack pine-black spruce forest

    B J Stocks;M E Alexander;B M Wotton;C N Stefner

  • Interdependencies between flame length and fireline intensity in predicting crown fire initiation and crown scorch height

    Martin E. Alexander;Miguel G. Cruz

  • Uncertainty associated with model predictions of surface and crown fire rates of spread

    Miguel G. Cruz;Martin E. Alexander

  • Modeling the Likelihood of Crown Fire Occurrence in Conifer Forest Stands

    Miguel G. Cruz;Martin E. Alexander;Ronald H. Wakimoto

  • Fuels and fire behavior dynamics in bark beetle-attacked forests in Western North America and implications for fire management

    Michael J. Jenkins;Wesley G. Page;Elizabeth G. Hebertson;Martin E. Alexander;Martin E. Alexander

  • Help with making crown fire hazard assessments

    M.E. Alexander

  • Overview of the International Crown Fire Modelling Experiment (ICFME)

    B J Stocks;M E Alexander;R A Lanoville

  • Variation in wind and crown fire behaviour in a northern jack pine - black spruce forest 1

    S. W. Taylor;B. M. Wotton;M. E. Alexander;G. N. Dalrymple

  • Evaluating a model for predicting active crown fire rate of spread using wildfire observations

    Martin E Alexander;Miguel G Cruz

  • Crown fire thresholds in exotic pine plantations of Australasia

    Martin Edward Alexander

  • Short communication: Are the applications of wildland fire behaviour models getting ahead of their evaluation again?

    Martin E. Alexander;Miguel G. Cruz

  • Current methods to assess fire danger potential

    J. San-Miguel-Ayanz;J. D. Carlson;Martin Alexander;Kevin Tolhurst

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel G. Cruz
Miguel G. Cruz Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Brian J. Stocks
Brian J. Stocks Canadian Forest Service
B. M. Wotton
B. M. Wotton University of Toronto
Edward W. Bork
Edward W. Bork University of Alberta
Paulo M. Fernandes
Paulo M. Fernandes University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro
David A. MacLean
David A. MacLean University of New Brunswick
Bryan A. Baum
Bryan A. Baum University of Wisconsin–Madison
Eric S. Kasischke
Eric S. Kasischke University of Maryland, College Park
Mark A. Finney
Mark A. Finney US Forest Service
Ross W. Wein
Ross W. Wein University of Alberta

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens the door to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in mapping and spatial analysis, earning a degree from colleges with GIS programs can be a valuable asset. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly critical for environmental planning and resource management professionals.

For graduates considering public service or environmental policy, enrolling in online MPA degrees offers a streamlined path to develop leadership and administrative expertise with flexibility. This is ideal for working professionals aiming to influence environmental governance.

An understanding of human behavior and social dynamics is crucial in environmental work, making online sociology bachelor programs an excellent complement to environmental sciences. These programs equip students with tools to manage community impacts and advocate for sustainable change.

For educators or those seeking advanced roles in academia or agency leadership, EdD without dissertation options provide an efficient path to doctoral credentials, emphasizing practical application over traditional research, which suits professionals looking to balance career and studies.

Best Scientists Citing Martin E. Alexander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles