World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
84
Citations
22547
World Ranking
804
National Ranking
347

Eric S. Kasischke publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric S. Kasischke sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 231 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Eric S. Kasischke D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric S. Kasischke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eric S. Kasischke is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park, United States. Their research areas focus primarily on environmental science, with particular work in ecology and global and planetary change.

The scientist's recent publications include the paper titled Assessing Boreal Peat Fire Severity and Vulnerability of Peatlands to Early Season Wildland Fire, published in 2020 in Frontiers in Forests and Global Change. This publication has attracted attention within the scientific community, reflected in its citation count.

Eric S. Kasischke's primary fields of study are as follows:

  • Environmental Science

Within this broader field, they focus on the following subfields:

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change

The main topics covered by their work include:

  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics

Frequent collaborators with Eric S. Kasischke include:

  • Laura Bourgeau-Chavez
  • Sarah Grelik
  • Michael Billmire
  • Liza K. Jenkins
  • Merritt R. Turetsky

Publications by Eric S. Kasischke are commonly found in the journal Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, reflecting their engagement with research dissemination in environmental science and ecosystem studies.

Best Publications

  • Lowland Forest Loss in Protected Areas of Indonesian Borneo

    L. M. Curran;S. N. Trigg;A. K. McDonald;D. Astiani

  • Recent changes in the fire regime across the North American boreal region—Spatial and temporal patterns of burning across Canada and Alaska

    Eric S. Kasischke;Merritt R. Turetsky

  • Dependence of radar backscatter on coniferous forest biomass

    M.C. Dobson;F.T. Ulaby;T. LeToan;A. Beaudoin

  • Continental-scale partitioning of fire emissions during the 1997 to 2001 El Niño/La Niña period.

    Guido R. van der Werf;James T. Randerson;G. James Collatz;Louis Giglio

  • Arctic and boreal ecosystems of western North America as components of the climate system

    F. S. Chapin Iii;A. D. McGuire;J. Randerson;Roger A. Pielke

  • Fire, Global Warming, and the Carbon Balance of Boreal Forests

    Eric S. Kasischke;N. L. Christensen;Brian J. Stocks

  • The use of Imaging radars for ecological applications : A review

    Eric S Kasischke;John M Melack;M Craig Dobson

  • Recent acceleration of biomass burning and carbon losses in Alaskan forests and peatlands

    Merritt R. Turetsky;Evan S. Kane;Jennifer W. Harden;Roger D. Ottmar

  • Change vector analysis: A technique for the multispectral monitoring of land cover and condition

    Unknown

  • The role of fire in the boreal carbon budget.

    J. W. Harden;Susan E. Trumbore;B. J. Stocks;A. Hirsch

  • Alaska's changing fire regime--implications for the vulnerability of its boreal forests

    Eric S. KasischkeE.S. Kasischke;David L. VerbylaD.L. Verbyla;T. Scott RuppT.S. Rupp;A. David McGuireA.D. McGuire

  • Fire, climate change, and carbon cycling in the boreal forest

    Eric S. Kasischke;Brian J. Stocks

  • Using Landsat data to assess fire and burn severity in the North American boreal forest region: an overview and summary of results

    Nancy H. F. French;Eric S. Kasischke;Ronald J. Hall;Karen A. Murphy

  • Analysis of the patterns of large fires in the boreal forest region of Alaska

    Eric S. Kasischke;David Williams;Donald Barry

  • Influences of boreal fire emissions on Northern Hemisphere atmospheric carbon and carbon monoxide

    Eric S. Kasischke;Edward J. Hyer;Paul C. Novelli;Lori P. Bruhwiler

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

  • Locating and estimating the areal extent of wildfires in alaskan boreal forests using multiple-season AVHRR NDVI composite data

    Eric S. Kasischke;Nancy H.F. French

  • AVHRR-based mapping of fires in Russia: New products for fire management and carbon cycle studies

    Anatoly I. Sukhinin;Nancy H.F. French;Eric S. Kasischke;Jenny H. Hewson

  • Emissions of carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, and methane from boreal forest fires in 1998

    Eric S. Kasischke;Lori P. Bruhwiler

  • Uncertainty in estimating carbon emissions from boreal forest fires

    Nancy H. F. French;Pierre Goovaerts;Eric S. Kasischke

  • Stand-level effects of soil burn severity on postfire regeneration in a recently burned black spruce forest

    Jill F Johnstone;Eric S Kasischke

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy H. F. French
Nancy H. F. French Michigan Technological University
Laura L. Bourgeau-Chavez
Laura L. Bourgeau-Chavez Michigan Technological University
Merritt R. Turetsky
Merritt R. Turetsky University of Colorado Boulder
A. D. McGuire
A. D. McGuire University of Alaska Fairbanks
Evan S. Kane
Evan S. Kane Michigan Technological University
Norman L. Christensen
Norman L. Christensen Duke University
Brian J. Stocks
Brian J. Stocks Canadian Forest Service
Jennifer W. Harden
Jennifer W. Harden United States Geological Survey
Jill F. Johnstone
Jill F. Johnstone University of Saskatchewan
Edward J. Hyer
Edward J. Hyer United States Naval Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open doors to diverse career options. Degrees in fields like geology and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are closely linked and often complement environmental studies well.

Online geology degrees offer specialized knowledge about Earth's physical structure, essential for careers in natural resource management, environmental consulting, and research. Similarly, top GIS masters programs provide advanced training in spatial data analysis, which is invaluable for mapping and managing environmental projects.

Some students may seek easier pathways to enter the environmental field; in that case, exploring easiest bachelor's degree options can help identify programs that balance academic rigor with accessibility, making it simpler to start a relevant career.

For those aiming to merge environmental expertise with leadership roles in public administration or policy, best online MPA programs offer degrees that emphasize management and governance skills. This combination is ideal for influencing environmental policy and driving sustainable initiatives within government or nonprofit sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Eric S. Kasischke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles