World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
60
Citations
15937
World Ranking
2265
National Ranking
151

Jill F. Johnstone publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill F. Johnstone sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 157 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jill F. Johnstone D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jill F. Johnstone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jill F. Johnstone is affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan in Canada. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a specialization in Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. Their work is also significantly connected to Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's published papers cover a range of topics, with prominent recent works including:

  • Carbon loss from boreal forest wildfires offset by increased dominance of deciduous trees (2021, Science)
  • Increasing fire and the decline of fire adapted black spruce in the boreal forest (2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Fuel availability not fire weather controls boreal wildfire severity and carbon emissions (2020, Nature Climate Change)
  • Global plant trait relationships extend to the climatic extremes of the tundra biome (2020, Nature Communications)
  • Wildfire combustion and carbon stocks in the southern Canadian boreal forest: Implications for a warming world (2020, Global Change Biology)

Frequent co-authors in Jill F. Johnstone's work include Michelle C. Mack, Xanthe J. Walker, Jennifer L. Baltzer, Merritt R. Turetsky, and Nicola J. Day. These collaborations appear regularly in research published across various journals.

The scientist often publishes in specific venues with multiple contributions to journals such as Ecosphere, Nature Communications, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, Ecology Letters, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Jill F. Johnstone's main research topics include:

  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Plant and animal studies

Their body of work provides insights into the interactions between wildfire dynamics, forest ecology, and climate change, particularly in boreal forest environments. This includes investigating how fire regimes affect carbon cycling, vegetation composition, and ecosystem responses under changing climatic conditions.

Best Publications

  • Changing disturbance regimes, ecological memory, and forest resilience

    Jill F. Johnstone;Craig D. Allen;Jerry F. Franklin;Lee E. Frelich

  • Plot-scale evidence of tundra vegetation change and links to recent summer warming.

    Sarah C. Elmendorf;Gregory H.R. Henry;Robert D. Hollister;Robert G. Björk

  • Open‐top designs for manipulating field temperature in high‐latitude ecosystems

    G.M. Marion;G.H.R. Henry;D.W. Freckman;J. Johnstone

  • Plant functional trait change across a warming tundra biome

    Anne D. Bjorkman;Anne D. Bjorkman;Isla H. Myers-Smith;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Sarah C. Elmendorf;Signe Normand

  • Changes in fire regime break the legacy lock on successional trajectories in Alaskan boreal forest

    Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Teresa N. Hollingsworth;F. Stuart Chapin;Michelle C. Mack

  • Increasing wildfires threaten historic carbon sink of boreal forest soils

    Xanthe J. Walker;Jennifer L. Baltzer;Steven G. Cumming;Nicola J. Day

  • BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene

    Maria Dornelas;Laura H. Antão;Laura H. Antão;Faye Moyes;Amanda E. Bates;Amanda E. Bates

  • Effects of Soil Burn Severity on Post-Fire Tree Recruitment in Boreal Forest

    Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;F. Stuart Chapin

  • Species composition interacts with fertilizer to control long-term change in tundra productivity

    Gaius R. Shaver;M. Syndonia Bret-Harte;M. Syndonia Bret-Harte;Michael H. Jones;Jill Johnstone

  • Fire, climate change, and forest resilience in interior Alaska

    Jill F. JohnstoneJ.F. Johnstone;F. Stuart ChapinF.S. Chapin;Teresa N. HollingsworthT.N. Hollingsworth;Michelle C. MackM.C. Mack

  • DEVELOPMENTAL PLASTICITY ALLOWS BETULA NANA TO DOMINATE TUNDRA SUBJECTED TO AN ALTERED ENVIRONMENT

    M. Syndonia Bret-Harte;Gaius R. Shaver;Jennifer P. Zoerner;Jill F. Johnstone

  • Global change and the boreal forest: thresholds, shifting states or gradual change?

    F. Stuart Chapin;Terry V. Callaghan;Yves Bergeron;M. Fukuda

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire: an expert assessment

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

  • Decadal observations of tree regeneration following fire in boreal forests

    Jill F Johnstone;F S Chapin;J Foote;S Kemmett

  • Fire Interval Effects on Successional Trajectory in Boreal Forests of Northwest Canada

    J. F. Johnstone;J. F. Johnstone;F. S. Chapin

  • Carbon loss from boreal forest wildfires offset by increased dominance of deciduous trees.

    Michelle C. Mack;Michelle C. Mack;Xanthe J. Walker;Xanthe J. Walker;Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Jill F. Johnstone;Heather D. Alexander;Heather D. Alexander

  • Stand-level effects of soil burn severity on postfire regeneration in a recently burned black spruce forest

    Jill F Johnstone;Eric S Kasischke

  • Increasing fire and the decline of fire adapted black spruce in the boreal forest.

    Jennifer L. Baltzer;Nicola J. Day;Xanthe J. Walker;David Greene

  • Quantifying fire severity, carbon, and nitrogen emissions in Alaska's boreal forest

    Leslie A. Boby;Edward A. G. Schuur;S Michelle C. Mack;David Verbyla

  • Once burned, twice shy: Repeat fires reduce seed availability and alter substrate constraints on Picea mariana regeneration

    Carissa D. Brown;Jill F. Johnstone

  • Variation in postfire organic layer thickness in a black spruce forest complex in interior Alaska and its effects on soil temperature and moisture

    Eric S Kasischke;Jill F Johnstone

  • Biomass offsets little or none of permafrost carbon release from soils, streams, and wildfire

    Benjamin W. Abbott;Jeremy B. Jones;Edward A. G. Schuur;F. Stuart Chapin

Frequent Co-Authors

Michelle C. Mack
Michelle C. Mack Northern Arizona University
Merritt R. Turetsky
Merritt R. Turetsky University of Colorado Boulder
Jennifer L. Baltzer
Jennifer L. Baltzer Wilfrid Laurier University
Scott J. Goetz
Scott J. Goetz Northern Arizona University
F. Stuart Chapin
F. Stuart Chapin University of Alaska Fairbanks
Edward A. G. Schuur
Edward A. G. Schuur Northern Arizona University
Sander Veraverbeke
Sander Veraverbeke Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Sarah C. Elmendorf
Sarah C. Elmendorf Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research
Teresa N. Hollingsworth
Teresa N. Hollingsworth German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina
Eric S. Kasischke
Eric S. Kasischke University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding careers. For students and professionals seeking flexible options, there are various online degree pathways in healthcare and life sciences that may complement or broaden your expertise. Understanding how many years to become a nurse practitioner is crucial for those interested in advanced roles that blend fieldwork, research, and patient care.

Bridge programs are also popular among those aiming to accelerate their careers. Fast-tracked options like rn to bsn online can allow registered nurses to quickly earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing with added flexibility. Similarly, professionals with an associate degree can pursue asn to np programs to bridge directly to a nurse practitioner credential.

For those with non-nursing backgrounds interested in healthcare, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online provide a direct route to earning a Master’s in Nursing. These online pathways allow students to combine scientific knowledge from ecology or related fields with advanced clinical and interdisciplinary skills—expanding both career opportunities and impact.

Best Scientists Citing Jill F. Johnstone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles