World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Brian A. Ebel publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian A. Ebel sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Brian A. Ebel D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian A. Ebel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian A. Ebel is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily centers on environmental science, with a focus on global and planetary change, management, monitoring, policy and law, water science and technology, atmospheric science, and materials chemistry.

The scientist's work extensively addresses topics such as fire effects on ecosystems, landslides and related hazards, hydrology and watershed management studies, soil erosion and sediment transport, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, flood risk assessment and management, and cryospheric studies and observations.

Brian A. Ebel has contributed to multiple publications in frequent venues including:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Hydrology
  • Hydrological Processes
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • The Cambridge Structural Database

Their recent papers include:

  • Temporal evolution of measured and simulated infiltration following wildfire in the Colorado Front Range, USA: Shifting thresholds of runoff generation and hydrologic hazards, 2020, Journal of Hydrology
  • Postwildfire Soil-Hydraulic Recovery and the Persistence of Debris Flow Hazards, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Post-wildfire hydrologic recovery in Mediterranean climates: A systematic review and case study to identify current knowledge and opportunities, 2021, Journal of Hydrology
  • Modeling Post-Wildfire Hydrologic Response: Review and Future Directions for Applications of Physically Based Distributed Simulation, 2023, Earth s Future
  • Parameter estimation for multiple post-wildfire hydrologic models, 2020, Hydrological Processes

Frequent co-authors of Brian A. Ebel include Sheila F. Murphy, Michelle A. Walvoord, Trevor F. Partridge, Deborah A. Martin, and Johanna M. Blake.

Best Publications

  • An overview of current applications, challenges, and future trends in distributed process-based models in hydrology

    Simone Fatichi;Enrique R. Vivoni;Fred L. Ogden;Valeriy Y. Ivanov

  • Hydrologic conditions controlling runoff generation immediately after wildfire

    Brian A. Ebel;John A. Moody;Deborah A. Martin

  • Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague

  • Aspect control of water movement on hillslopes near the rain–snow transition of the Colorado Front Range

    Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley;Eve-Lyn S. Hinckley;Brian A. Ebel;Rebecca T. Barnes;Robert S. Anderson;Robert S. Anderson

  • Synthesis of soil‐hydraulic properties and infiltration timescales in wildfire‐affected soils

    Brian A. Ebel;John A. Moody

  • First-order exchange coefficient coupling for simulating surface water-groundwater interactions: parameter sensitivity and consistency with a physics-based approach.

    Brian A. Ebel;Benjamin B. Mirus;Christopher S. Heppner;Joel E. VanderKwaak

  • Physics-based continuous simulation of long-term near-surface hydrologic response for the Coos Bay experimental catchment

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;David R. Montgomery;William E. Dietrich

  • Hyper-dry conditions provide new insights into the cause of extreme floods after wildfire

    John A. Moody;Brian A. Ebel

  • Relations between soil hydraulic properties and burn severity

    John A. Moody;Brian A. Ebel;Petter Nyman;Deborah A. Martin

  • Further testing of the Integrated Hydrology Model (InHM): event-based simulations for a small rangeland catchment located near Chickasha, Oklahoma

    Keith Loague;Christopher S. Heppner;Robert H. Abrams;Adrianne E. Carr

  • Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations

    Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;Joel E. Vanderkwaak;William E. Dietrich

  • Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: foundation for hydroecology and hydrogeomorphology

    Keith Loague;Christopher S. Heppner;Benjamin B. Mirus;Brian A. Ebel

  • Fire, flood, and drought: Extreme climate events alter flow paths and stream chemistry

    Sheila F. Murphy;R. Blaine McCleskey;Deborah A. Martin;Jeffrey H. Writer;Jeffrey H. Writer

  • Disturbance hydrology: challenges and opportunities

    Brian A. Ebel;Benjamin B. Mirus

  • Simulated effect of a forest road on near‐surface hydrologic response: redux

    Benjamin B. Mirus;Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;Beverley C. Wemple

  • Temporal evolution of measured and simulated infiltration following wildfire in the Colorado Front Range, USA: Shifting thresholds of runoff generation and hydrologic hazards

    Brian A. Ebel

  • Development of perennial thaw zones in boreal hillslopes enhances potential mobilization of permafrost carbon

    Michelle A Walvoord;Clifford I Voss;Brian A Ebel;Burke J Minsley

  • Wildfire impacts on soil-water retention in the Colorado Front Range, United States

    Brian A. Ebel;Brian A. Ebel

  • Infiltration and runoff generation processes in fire‐affected soils

    John A. Moody;Brian A. Ebel;Brian A. Ebel

  • The impacts of hysteresis on variably saturated hydrologic response and slope failure

    Brian A. Ebel;Brian A. Ebel;Keith Loague;Ronaldo I. Borja

  • Meta-analysis of field-saturated hydraulic conductivity recovery following wildland fire: Applications for hydrologic model parameterization and resilience assessment

    Brian A. Ebel;Deborah A. Martin

  • Simulated Effect of a Forest Road on Near-Surface Hydrologic Response

    B. B. Mirus;B. A. Ebel;K. Loague

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Loague
Keith Loague Stanford University
Michelle Ann Walvoord
Michelle Ann Walvoord United States Geological Survey
Benjamin B. Mirus
Benjamin B. Mirus United States Geological Survey
John A. Moody
John A. Moody United States Geological Survey
Suzanne P. Anderson
Suzanne P. Anderson University of Colorado Boulder
Clifford I. Voss
Clifford I. Voss United States Geological Survey
Francis K. Rengers
Francis K. Rengers United States Geological Survey
John R. Nimmo
John R. Nimmo United States Geological Survey
Gregory E. Tucker
Gregory E. Tucker University of Colorado Boulder
Kamini Singha
Kamini Singha Colorado School of Mines

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths, many of which can be enhanced by supplementary online degrees. For instance, a degree in library science can be valuable for those interested in managing scientific data and environmental information resources effectively.

Additionally, emerging fields like environmental photography highlight the relevance of creative skills alongside scientific knowledge. Aspiring professionals might consider exploring photography colleges online to gain technical expertise in capturing landscapes and natural phenomena.

Veterans seeking to transition into Earth Science-related careers may find support by looking into veteran friendly online photography degree programs, which offer tailored resources and flexible scheduling to accommodate unique needs.

For those combining Earth Science with global communication skills, pursuing the cheapest online spanish degree can enhance employability in international research or environmental policy roles. These related online degrees provide diverse options to complement and enrich a career in Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Brian A. Ebel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles