What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Erosion
- Hydrology
- Geomorphology
His primary areas of study are Landslide, Hydrology, Geomorphology, Debris flow and Debris.
The various areas that Jonathan W. Godt examines in his Landslide study include Infiltration, Pore water pressure and Water table.
His research in Infiltration intersects with topics in Vadose zone, Soil water, Landslide susceptibility and Water content.
In his study, Geomechanics, Hydrology, Shear strength and Subsurface flow is inextricably linked to Natural hazard, which falls within the broad field of Hydrology.
He connects Debris flow with Antecedent moisture in his research.
His work deals with themes such as Colluvium and Erosion, which intersect with Debris.
His most cited work include:
- A closed‐form equation for effective stress in unsaturated soil (376 citations)
- TRIGRS - A Fortran Program for Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-Based Regional Slope-Stability Analysis, Version 2.0 (320 citations)
- Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA (301 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Jonathan W. Godt mainly focuses on Landslide, Hydrology, Geomorphology, Geotechnical engineering and Debris.
His Landslide research is within the category of Seismology.
His work on Snowmelt and Hydrology as part of general Hydrology study is frequently linked to Antecedent moisture and Coast range, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
As part of one scientific family, Jonathan W. Godt deals mainly with the area of Geotechnical engineering, narrowing it down to issues related to the Soil water, and often Water table.
His work on Debris flow as part of his general Debris study is frequently connected to Range, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.
His Infiltration research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Vadose zone, Pore water pressure and Water content.
He most often published in these fields:
- Landslide (69.77%)
- Hydrology (31.01%)
- Geomorphology (20.93%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Landslide (69.77%)
- Hydrology (31.01%)
- Slope stability (16.28%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Landslide, Hydrology, Slope stability, Seismology and Geotechnical engineering are his primary areas of study.
His Landslide research entails a greater understanding of Geomorphology.
Jonathan W. Godt combines topics linked to Debris with his work on Hydrology.
His Slope stability research incorporates elements of Infiltration, Soil science, Saturated soils and Levee.
His work in the fields of Landslide dam overlaps with other areas such as Event, Predictor variable and Source area.
He works mostly in the field of Debris flow, limiting it down to concerns involving Cohesion and, occasionally, Pore water pressure.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal (122 citations)
- Presentation and Analysis of a Worldwide Database of Earthquake-Induced Landslide Inventories (76 citations)
- Landslides Triggered by the 14 November 2016 Mw 7.8 Kaikōura Earthquake, New Zealand (61 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Erosion
- Hydrology
- Geomorphology
Jonathan W. Godt focuses on Landslide, Seismology, Slope stability, Hydrology and Debris.
Jonathan W. Godt merges Landslide with Geological survey in his research.
Jonathan W. Godt has included themes like Erosion and Geomorphology in his Seismology study.
As part of the same scientific family, Jonathan W. Godt usually focuses on Slope stability, concentrating on Infiltration and intersecting with Suction stress, Soil water and Hydraulic conductivity.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Cohesion and Debris flow in addition to Hydrology.
Jonathan W. Godt has researched Debris in several fields, including Pyroclastic rock and Natural hazard.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
