World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Jonathan W. Godt publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Godt sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Jonathan W. Godt D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan W. Godt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan W. Godt is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in landslides and related hazards.

The scientist's main fields of study include:

  • Environmental Science

Subfields of study cover a range of topics related to environmental monitoring and risk, such as:

  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Artificial Intelligence

The core topics of Jonathan W. Godt's work include:

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow

Key recent publications by Jonathan W. Godt include:

  • "National strategy for landslide loss reduction," 2022, published in Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World
  • "Landslides across the USA: occurrence, susceptibility, and data limitations," 2020, published in Landslides
  • "Principles for collaborative risk communication: Reducing landslide losses in Puerto Rico," 2021, published in Journal of Emergency Management
  • "Evaluation of techniques for mitigating snowmelt infiltration-induced landsliding in a highway embankment," 2021, published in Engineering Geology
  • "When hazard avoidance is not an option: lessons learned from monitoring the postdisaster Oso landslide, USA," 2021, published in Landslides

Jonathan W. Godt frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Stephen L. Slaughter
  • Benjamin B. Mirus
  • Rex L. Baum
  • Jocelyn West
  • Lindsay Davis

The scientist's studies have appeared in various publication venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • Landslides
  • Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World
  • Engineering Geology
  • Journal of Emergency Management
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America

Best Publications

  • A closed‐form equation for effective stress in unsaturated soil

    Ning Lu;Jonathan W. Godt;David T. Wu

  • Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA

    Rex L. Baum;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment

    Richard M. Iverson;Mark E. Reid;Matthew Logan;Richard G. LaHusen

  • High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity

    Matthew Weingarten;Shemin Ge;Jonathan W. Godt;Barbara A. Bekins

  • TRIGRS - A Fortran Program for Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-Based Regional Slope-Stability Analysis, Version 2.0

    Rex L. Baum;William Z. Savage;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Infinite slope stability under steady unsaturated seepage conditions

    Ning Lu;Jonathan W. Godt

  • The size, distribution, and mobility of landslides caused by the 2015 Mw7.8 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal

    Kevin Roback;Marin K. Clark;A. Joshua West;Dimitrios Zekkos

  • Estimating the timing and location of shallow rainfall‐induced landslides using a model for transient, unsaturated infiltration

    Rex L. Baum;Jonathan W. Godt;William Z. Savage

  • Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster

    R.M. Iverson;D.L. George;K. Allstadt;M.E. Reid

  • Initiation conditions for debris flows generated by runoff at Chalk Cliffs, central Colorado

    Jeffrey A. Coe;David A. Kinner;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Hillslope Hydrology and Stability

    Ning Lu;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: Requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework

    J.W. Godt;R.L. Baum;W.Z. Savage;D. Salciarini

  • Rainfall characteristics for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington, USA

    Jonathan W. Godt;Rex L. Baum;Alan F. Chleborad

  • Landsliding in partially saturated materials

    Jonathan W. Godt;Rex L. Baum;Ning Lu

  • Modeling regional initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the eastern Umbria Region of central Italy

    Diana Salciarini;Jonathan W. Godt;William Z. Savage;Pietro Conversini

  • Presentation and Analysis of a Worldwide Database of Earthquake-Induced Landslide Inventories

    Hakan Tanyaş;Cees J. van Westen;Kate E. Allstadt;M. Anna Nowicki Jessee

  • Seasonal movement of the Slumgullion landslide determined from Global Positioning System surveys and field instrumentation, July 1998–March 2002

    J.A Coe;W.L Ellis;J.W Godt;W.Z Savage

  • Hysteresis and Uncertainty in Soil Water-Retention Curve Parameters

    William J. Likos;Ning Lu;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Alpine debris flows triggered by a 28 July 1999 thunderstorm in the central Front Range, Colorado

    Jonathan W. Godt;Jeffrey A. Coe

  • Improving predictive power of physically based rainfall-induced shallow landslide models: a probabilistic approach

    S. Raia;M. Alvioli;M. Rossi;R. L. Baum

Frequent Co-Authors

Rex L. Baum
Rex L. Baum United States Geological Survey
Jeffrey A. Coe
Jeffrey A. Coe United States Geological Survey
Randall W. Jibson
Randall W. Jibson United States Geological Survey
Jason W. Kean
Jason W. Kean United States Geological Survey
Francis K. Rengers
Francis K. Rengers United States Geological Survey
Benjamin B. Mirus
Benjamin B. Mirus United States Geological Survey
Brian D. Collins
Brian D. Collins United States Geological Survey
David J. Wald
David J. Wald United States Geological Survey
Marin K. Clark
Marin K. Clark University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Edwin L. Harp
Edwin L. Harp United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of career opportunities beyond the traditional roles in geology and environmental science. For professionals interested in expanding their skills in management and leadership, pursuing a human resource management masters degree online can complement scientific expertise with organizational capabilities.

Older adults looking to transition or upgrade their careers may find that online degrees tailored for mature learners offer flexibility and relevant content. The guide on best degrees for older adults highlights options that can be balanced with personal commitments while providing valuable qualifications.

Additionally, for those intrigued by information science and preservation, earning an accredited degree through ALA accredited library science programs online can open career pathways in managing scientific collections and databases. Considering whether is library science a good career involves understanding its blend of technology, research, and service, which can be a great fit for Earth Science graduates focused on data curation and knowledge management.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan W. Godt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles