World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Rex L. Baum publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rex L. Baum sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Rex L. Baum D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rex L. Baum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rex L. Baum is affiliated with the United States Geological Survey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on landslides and related hazards within the broader field of Environmental Science, with secondary contributions to Engineering and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Several subfields of their work include Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Civil and Structural Engineering, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's recent publications address various aspects of landslide susceptibility, monitoring, and modeling. Notable papers include:

  • Landslides across the USA: occurrence, susceptibility, and data limitations (2020, Landslides)
  • Incorporating the Effects of Complex Soil Layering and Thickness Local Variability into Distributed Landslide Susceptibility Assessments (2021, Water)
  • HydroMet: A New Code for Automated Objective Optimization of Hydrometeorological Thresholds for Landslide Initiation (2021, Water)
  • When hazard avoidance is not an option: lessons learned from monitoring the postdisaster Oso landslide, USA (2021, Landslides)
  • Assessing locations susceptible to shallow landslide initiation during prolonged intense rainfall in the Lares, Utuado, and Naranjito municipalities of Puerto Rico (2024, Natural hazards and earth system sciences)

Frequent coauthors contributing alongside Rex L. Baum include Mark E. Reid, Jeffrey A. Coe, Benjamin B. Mirus, Jonathan W. Godt, and Stephen L. Slaughter. Coauthorship patterns indicate collaboration primarily in landslide hazard monitoring and related environmental assessments.

The scientist's publications are regularly featured in venues such as:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Landslides
  • Water
  • Natural hazards and earth system sciences
  • Data report

Research topics span:

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Tree Root and Stability Studies
  • Seismology and Earthquake Studies

Overall, Rex L. Baum's expertise integrates multidisciplinary approaches to understanding environmental hazards, particularly landslide risks, through observational studies, data analysis, and modeling efforts. The work contributes to hazard management policies, monitoring protocols, and engineering applications addressing natural disaster impacts on various landscapes.

Best Publications

  • Early warning of rainfall-induced shallow landslides and debris flows in the USA

    Rex L. Baum;Jonathan W. Godt

  • TRIGRS - A Fortran Program for Transient Rainfall Infiltration and Grid-Based Regional Slope-Stability Analysis, Version 2.0

    Rex L. Baum;William Z. Savage;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Estimating the timing and location of shallow rainfall‐induced landslides using a model for transient, unsaturated infiltration

    Rex L. Baum;Jonathan W. Godt;William Z. Savage

  • Landslide mobility and hazards: implications of the 2014 Oso disaster

    R.M. Iverson;D.L. George;K. Allstadt;M.E. Reid

  • Transient deterministic shallow landslide modeling: Requirements for susceptibility and hazard assessments in a GIS framework

    J.W. Godt;R.L. Baum;W.Z. Savage;D. Salciarini

  • Rainfall characteristics for shallow landsliding in Seattle, Washington, USA

    Jonathan W. Godt;Rex L. Baum;Alan F. Chleborad

  • Landsliding in partially saturated materials

    Jonathan W. Godt;Rex L. Baum;Ning Lu

  • Modeling regional initiation of rainfall-induced shallow landslides in the eastern Umbria Region of central Italy

    Diana Salciarini;Jonathan W. Godt;William Z. Savage;Pietro Conversini

  • Improving predictive power of physically based rainfall-induced shallow landslide models: a probabilistic approach

    S. Raia;M. Alvioli;M. Rossi;R. L. Baum

  • Parallelization of the TRIGRS model for rainfall-induced landslides using the message passing interface

    M. Alvioli;R.L. Baum

  • Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA

    Rex L. Baum;Jeffery A. Coe;Jonathan W. Godt;Edwin L. Harp

  • Landslides across the USA: occurrence, susceptibility, and data limitations

    Benjamin B. Mirus;Eric S. Jones;Rex L. Baum;Jonathan W. Godt

  • Integrating real-time subsurface hydrologic monitoring with empirical rainfall thresholds to improve landslide early warning

    Benjamin B. Mirus;Rachel E. Becker;Rex L. Baum;Joel B. Smith

  • Modeling landslide recurrence in Seattle, Washington, USA

    Diana Salciarini;Jonathan W. Godt;William Z. Savage;Rex L. Baum

  • New insights into debris-flow hazards from an extraordinary event in the Colorado Front Range

    Jeffrey A. Coe;Jason W. Kean;Jonathan W. Godt;Rex L. Baum

  • Deterministic estimation of hydrological thresholds for shallow landslide initiation and slope stability models: case study from the Somma-Vesuvius area of southern Italy

    P. De Vita;E. Napolitano;J. W. Godt;R. L. Baum

  • Stability of infinite slopes under transient partially saturated seepage conditions

    Jonathan W. Godt;Başak Şener-Kaya;Ning Lu;Rex L. Baum

  • Landslide susceptibility from topography in Guatemala

    J.A. Coe;J.W. Godt;R.L. Baum;R.C. Bucknam

  • Modeling time-dependent areal slope stability

    W. Z Savage;J. W Godt;R. L Baum

  • Effect of antecedent-hydrological conditions on rainfall triggering of debris flows in ash-fall pyroclastic mantled slopes of Campania (southern Italy)

    E. Napolitano;F Fusco;Rex L. Baum;Jonathan W. Godt

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan W. Godt
Jonathan W. Godt United States Geological Survey
Jeffrey A. Coe
Jeffrey A. Coe United States Geological Survey
Benjamin B. Mirus
Benjamin B. Mirus United States Geological Survey
Jason W. Kean
Jason W. Kean United States Geological Survey
Edwin L. Harp
Edwin L. Harp United States Geological Survey
Brian D. Collins
Brian D. Collins United States Geological Survey
Arvid M. Johnson
Arvid M. Johnson Purdue University West Lafayette
Dalia Kirschbaum
Dalia Kirschbaum Goddard Space Flight Center
Dennis M. Staley
Dennis M. Staley United States Geological Survey
Randall W. Jibson
Randall W. Jibson United States Geological Survey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Earth Science often explore related fields to broaden their expertise and career opportunities. For example, creative disciplines like photography have gained popularity as complementary skills for environmental documentation and research. Many institutions offer online photography degrees that provide flexible learning options without compromising quality.

Veterans seeking educational advancement find tailored programs that respect their unique experiences. There are several options like the online photography bachelor degree for veterans, which offers specialized support and military-friendly policies to facilitate a smooth transition into civilian careers.

Language skills also complement Earth Science careers, especially in international research or environmental policy. Pursuing a bachelors in spanish online allows learners to access affordable and concise programs aimed at job market readiness.

Furthermore, military-affiliated students may benefit from programs like military friendly online spanish degree programs, which combine language proficiency with veteran-specific resources, creating valuable pathways for diverse career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Rex L. Baum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles