World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Thom Bogaard publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thom Bogaard sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Thom Bogaard D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thom Bogaard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thom Bogaard is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with significant contributions to fields such as management, monitoring, policy and law, environmental engineering, atmospheric science, civil and structural engineering, and water science and technology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Soil and unsaturated flow
  • Soil moisture and remote sensing
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Flood risk assessment and management
  • Fecal contamination and water quality

Thom Bogaard has published extensively in various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
  • Landslides
  • Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Their recent papers cover several aspects of landslide research and hydrology, including:

  • "Soil moisture information can improve shallow landslide forecasting using the hydrometeorological threshold approach," 2020, Landslides
  • "World-wide InSAR sensitivity index for landslide deformation tracking," 2022, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • "Landslide precipitation thresholds in Rwanda," 2020, Landslides
  • "Machine Learning: New Potential for Local and Regional Deep-Seated Landslide Nowcasting," 2020, Sensors
  • "Recent advancements of landslide hydrology," 2023, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water

Co-author collaborations have been notable with several researchers, including:

  • Jan Willem Foppen
  • John Conallin
  • Yuchen Tang
  • Roberto Greco
  • Markus Hrachowitz

Bogaard has also contributed to book publications, with a notable work titled "Distributed Fiber-optic Hydrogeophysics" published in 2022 by The Groundwater Project eBooks.

Best Publications

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • What can flux tracking teach us about water age distribution patterns and their temporal dynamics

    Markus Hrachowitz;H. Savenije;H. Savenije;T. A. Bogaard;T. A. Bogaard;D. Tetzlaff

  • Landslide hydrology: from hydrology to pore pressure

    Thom A. Bogaard;Roberto Greco

  • Dynamic earth system and ecological controls of rainfall-initiated landslides

    Roy C. Sidle;Thom A. Bogaard

  • Invited perspectives: Hydrological perspectives on precipitation intensity-duration thresholds for landslide initiation: proposing hydro-meteorological thresholds

    Thom Bogaard;Roberto Greco

  • Uncertainties in transpiration estimates

    A. M. J. Coenders-Gerrits;R. J. van der Ent;T. A. Bogaard;L. Wang-Erlandsson;L. Wang-Erlandsson

  • Feasibility of soil moisture estimation using passive distributed temperature sensing

    S. C. Steele-Dunne;M. M. Rutten;D. M. Krzeminska;M. Hausner

  • Problems in predicting the mobility of slow-moving landslides

    Th.W.J. van Asch;L.P.H. Van Beek;T.A. Bogaard

  • On the reproducibility and repeatability of laser absorption spectroscopy measurements for δ2H and δ18O isotopic analysis

    D. Penna;Barbara Stenni;M. Šanda;S. Wrede

  • How vegetation reinforces soil on slopes

    Alexia Stokes;Joanne E. Norris;L. P. H. van Beek;Thom Bogaard

  • Technical Note: Evaluation of between-sample memory effects in the analysis of δ2H and δ18O of water samples measured by laser spectroscopes

    D. Penna;D. Penna;Barbara Stenni;M. Šanda;S. Wrede

  • Physically-based landslide prediction over a large region: Scaling low-resolution hydrological model results for high-resolution slope stability assessment

    Sheng Wang;Sheng Wang;Ke Zhang;Ludovicus P.H. van Beek;Xin Tian

  • Advancing catchment hydrology to deal with predictions under change

    U. Ehret;H. V. Gupta;M. Sivapalan;S. V. Weijs

  • Introduction to RISC-KIT: Resilience-increasing strategies for coasts

    Ap van Dongeren;Paolo Ciavola;Grit Martinez;Christophe Viavattene

  • Soil moisture information can improve shallow landslide forecasting using the hydrometeorological threshold approach

    Pasquale Marino;David J. Peres;Antonino Cancelliere;Roberto Greco

  • On the value of combined event runoff and tracer analysis to improve understanding of catchment functioning in a data-scarce semi-arid area

    M. Hrachowitz;R. Bohte;M. L. Mul;T. A. Bogaard;T. A. Bogaard

  • World-wide InSAR sensitivity index for landslide deformation tracking

    Unknown

  • Quantifying hyporheic exchange at high spatial resolution using natural temperature variations along a first?order stream

    Martijn Westhoff;M. N. Gooseff;T. A. Bogaard;H. H. G. Savenije

  • Quantification of the influence of preferential flow on slope stability using a numerical modelling approach

    W. Shao;T. A. Bogaard;M. Bakker;R. Greco

  • The water footprint of bioenergy from Jatropha curcas L.

    R. E. E. Jongschaap;R. A. R. Blesgraaf;T. A. Bogaard;E. N. van Loo

  • Identifying the origin of groundwater and flow processes in complex landslides affecting black marls: insights from a hydrochemical survey

    V. de Montety;Vincent Marc;Christophe Emblanch;Jean-Philippe Malet;Jean-Philippe Malet

  • Natural pollution caused by the extremely acidic crater lake Kawah Ijen, East Java, Indonesia.

    Ansje Löhr;Thom Bogaard;Alex Heikens;Martin Hendriks

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-Philippe Malet
Jean-Philippe Malet University of Strasbourg
Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Mark Bakker
Mark Bakker Delft University of Technology
L.P.H. van Beek
L.P.H. van Beek Utrecht University
Markus Hrachowitz
Markus Hrachowitz Delft University of Technology
Th.W.J. van Asch
Th.W.J. van Asch Utrecht University
Luca Schenato
Luca Schenato University of Padua
Stefan Uhlenbrook
Stefan Uhlenbrook International Water Management Institute
Thomas Glade
Thomas Glade University of Vienna
Nick van de Giesen
Nick van de Giesen Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths, from environmental consulting to geological research. For those interested in complementary skills, exploring fields like digital media or language studies can be advantageous. For example, a cheapest online photography degree program can help enhance skills in scientific imaging and documentation, valuable in field research and presentations.

Military veterans aiming to transition into civilian Earth Science careers can find support through specialized programs. The best military friendly online photography degrees offer flexible learning options tailored to their unique needs, often with credit for prior service.

Additionally, language skills play a critical role in global environmental projects. Studying an online degree in Spanish can broaden communication abilities, opening more international opportunities.

Veterans interested in language programs will find several options through military friendly online spanish degree programs, which provide flexible schedules and veteran-specific support to ease their academic journey.

Best Scientists Citing Thom Bogaard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles