World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
11922
World Ranking
4008
National Ranking
101

Markus Hrachowitz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Hrachowitz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 235 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Markus Hrachowitz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Hrachowitz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Markus Hrachowitz is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands and has an extensive publication record in the field of Environmental Science, contributing to 133 publications.

Their research focuses on several subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Oceanography

The main topics of their work encompass multiple areas of hydrology and environmental processes:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Cryospheric studies and observations

The scientist has published frequently in several key journals. The most common publication venues include:

  • Hydrology and earth system sciences (22 publications)
  • Water Resources Research (13 publications)
  • The Science of The Total Environment (3 publications)
  • Water Resources Management (3 publications)
  • Frontiers in Water (2 publications)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Markus Hrachowitz reflect diverse topics within hydrology and environmental systems:

  • "Improving the Predictive Skill of a Distributed Hydrological Model by Calibration on Spatial Patterns With Multiple Satellite Data Sets," 2020, Water Resources Research
  • "Transit Time Estimation in Catchments: Recent Developments and Future Directions," 2022, Water Resources Research
  • "Future changes in annual, seasonal and monthly runoff signatures in contrasting Alpine catchments in Austria," 2021, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • "Behind the scenes of streamflow model performance," 2021, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • "Reduction of vegetation-accessible water storage capacity after deforestation affects catchment travel time distributions and increases young water fractions in a headwater catchment," 2021, Hydrology and earth system sciences

Collaborations appear consistent, with frequent co-authors including:

  • H. H. G. Savenije
  • Miriam Coenders-Gerrits
  • C. J. Harman
  • Attilio Castellarin
  • Juliane Mai

Best Publications

  • A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review

    M. Hrachowitz;H. H. G. Savenije;G. Blöschl;J. J. Mcdonnell

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • A precipitation shift from snow towards rain leads to a decrease in streamflow

    W. R. Berghuijs;W. R. Berghuijs;R. A. Woods;M. Hrachowitz

  • What can flux tracking teach us about water age distribution patterns and their temporal dynamics

    Markus Hrachowitz;H. Savenije;H. Savenije;T. A. Bogaard;T. A. Bogaard;D. Tetzlaff

  • Transit times – the link between hydrology and water quality at the catchment scale

    Markus Hrachowitz;Paolo Benettin;Boris M. van Breukelen;Ophelie Fovet

  • The demographics of water: A review of water ages in the critical zone

    Matthias Sprenger;Matthias Sprenger;Matthias Sprenger;Christine Stumpp;Markus Weiler;Werner Aeschbach

  • A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures

    T. Euser;H. C. Winsemius;M. Hrachowitz;F. Fenicia

  • HESS Opinions: The complementary merits of competing modelling philosophies in hydrology

    Markus Hrachowitz;Martyn P. Clark

  • Climate controls how ecosystems size the root zone storage capacity at catchment scale

    H. Gao;M. Hrachowitz;S.J. Schymanski;F.F. Fenicia;F.F. Fenicia

  • Storage selection functions : A coherent framework for quantifying how catchments store and release water and solutes

    Andrea Rinaldo;Paolo Benettin;Ciaran J. Harman;Markus Hrachowitz

  • Process Consistency in Models: the Importance of System Signatures, Expert Knowledge and Process Complexity

    M. Hrachowitz;O. Fovet;O. Fovet;L. Ruiz;L. Ruiz;T. Euser

  • Uncertainties in transpiration estimates

    A. M. J. Coenders-Gerrits;R. J. van der Ent;T. A. Bogaard;L. Wang-Erlandsson;L. Wang-Erlandsson

  • Gamma distribution models for transit time estimation in catchments: Physical interpretation of parameters and implications for time-variant transit time assessment

    M. Hrachowitz;M. Hrachowitz;C. Soulsby;D. Tetzlaff;I. A. Malcolm

  • Improving the Predictive Skill of a Distributed Hydrological Model by Calibration on Spatial Patterns With Multiple Satellite Data Sets

    Moctar Dembélé;Moctar Dembélé;Markus Hrachowitz;Hubert H. G. Savenije;Grégoire Mariéthoz

  • Influence of hydrology and seasonality on DOC exports from three contrasting upland catchments

    J. J. C. Dawson;C. Soulsby;D. Tetzlaff;M. Hrachowitz

  • Regionalization of transit time estimates in montane catchments by integrating landscape controls

    Markus Hrachowitz;Christopher Soulsby;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Julian James Charles Dawson

  • Hydrological landscape classification: Investigating the performance of HAND based landscape classifications in a central European meso-scale catchment

    S. Gharari;M. Hrachowitz;F. Fenicia;H. H. G. Savenije

  • Testing the realism of a topography driven model (FLEX-Topo) in the nested catchments of the Upper Heihe, China

    H. Gao;M. Hrachowitz;F.F. Fenicia;F.F. Fenicia;S. Gharari

  • Using long-term data sets to understand transit times in contrasting headwater catchments

    Markus Hrachowitz;Christopher Soulsby;Doerthe Tetzlaff;Julian James Charles Dawson

  • Constraining Conceptual Hydrological Models With Multiple Information Sources

    R.C. Nijzink;S. Almeida;S. Almeida;I. G. Pechlivanidis;R. Capell

  • Using expert knowledge to increase realism in environmental system models can dramatically reduce the need for calibration

    S. Gharari;M. Hrachowitz;F. Fenicia;F. Fenicia;H. Gao

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Doerthe Tetzlaff
Doerthe Tetzlaff Leibniz Association
Chris Soulsby
Chris Soulsby University of Aberdeen
Hessel Winsemius
Hessel Winsemius Delft University of Technology
Laurent Ruiz
Laurent Ruiz Indian Institute of Science
Berit Arheimer
Berit Arheimer Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Jim Freer
Jim Freer University of Bristol
Thorsten Wagener
Thorsten Wagener University of Potsdam
Chantal Gascuel-Odoux
Chantal Gascuel-Odoux University of Rennes
Dawei Han
Dawei Han University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, expanding your expertise through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students opt for an online bachelors degree programs in sociology to better understand human-environment interactions and societal impacts. This knowledge is critical in addressing environmental challenges through a social lens.

Educators and professionals looking to advance their careers might consider transitioning from an online EDS to EDD program. The pathway offered by online eds to edd programs provides a flexible route to doctoral-level expertise in education leadership and policy, vital for developing sustainable educational initiatives.

Moreover, those seeking doctoral opportunities will find valuable options by exploring edd no dissertation programs, which cater to professionals who prefer practical, applied research over traditional dissertation requirements.

Finally, social work professionals interested in environmental justice and community advocacy can benefit from affordable online doctoral programs, such as dsw programs online. These programs equip leaders to address social determinants impacting environmental policies and community health.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Hrachowitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles