World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Juraj Parajka

Juraj Parajka

Award Badge
Earth Science
Austria
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
56
Citations
14031
World Ranking
2369
National Ranking
6

Juraj Parajka publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juraj Parajka sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 246 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Juraj Parajka D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Juraj Parajka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Earth Science in Austria Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Earth Science in Austria Leader Award

Overview

Juraj Parajka is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and is an active researcher specializing in Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans several subfields, including Water Science and Technology, Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering, and Soil Science.

Parajka's research interests revolve around key topics such as:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Cryospheric Studies and Observations
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Climate Variability and Models

The scientist has contributed to various frequent publication venues, including:

  • Water Resources Research
  • Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Water
  • Journal of Hydrology

Some notable recent papers by Parajka include:

  • "Current European flood-rich period exceptional compared with past 500 years" (2020), published in Nature
  • "More green and less blue water in the Alps during warmer summers" (2020), published in Nature Climate Change
  • "Why does a conceptual hydrological model fail to correctly predict discharge changes in response to climate change?" (2020), published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • "Mapping snow cover from daily Collection 6 MODIS products over Austria" (2020), published in Journal of Hydrology
  • "The Added Value of Different Data Types for Calibrating and Testing a Hydrologic Model in a Small Catchment" (2020), published in Water Resources Research

Frequent collaborators in Parajka's research include:

  • Günter Blöschl
  • Borbála Széles
  • Jürgen Komma
  • Peter Strauß
  • Attilio Castellarin

Juraj Parajka's scientific contributions extend predominantly in hydrology-related fields, emphasizing hydrological modeling, flood risk, and water resource management. Their extensive research output in renowned journals reflects an engagement with both observational and modeling approaches to environmental and watershed science issues.

Best Publications

  • Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods

    Günter Blöschl;Julia Hall;Alberto Viglione;Alberto Viglione;Rui A P Perdigão

  • Changing climate shifts timing of European floods

    Günter Blöschl;Julia Hall;Juraj Parajka;Rui A. P. Perdigão

  • Understanding Flood Regime Changes in Europe: A state of the art assessment

    J Hall;B Arheimer;M Borga;R Brazdil;R Brazdil

  • A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters

    J. Parajka;J. Parajka;R. Merz;G. Blöschl

  • Time stability of catchment model parameters: Implications for climate impact analyses

    Ralf Merz;Juraj Parajka;Günter Blöschl

  • Spatio-temporal combination of MODIS images - potential for snow cover mapping

    J. Parajka;J. Parajka;G. Blöschl

  • Land use change impacts on floods at the catchment scale : challenges and opportunities for future research

    M. Rogger;M. Agnoletti;A. Alaoui;J.C. Bathurst

  • Bacterial diversity along a 2600 km river continuum

    Domenico Savio;Lucas Sinclair;Umer Z. Ijaz;Juraj Parajka

  • Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients

    R. Merz;G. Blöschl;J. Parajka

  • The June 2013 flood in the Upper Danube Basin, and comparisons with the 2002, 1954 and 1899 floods

    G. Blöschl;T. Nester;J. Komma;J. Parajka

  • Validation of MODIS snow cover images over Austria

    J. Parajka;J. Parajka;G. Blöschl

  • The value of MODIS snow cover data in validating and calibrating conceptual hydrologic models

    J. Parajka;G. Blöschl

  • Current European flood-rich period exceptional compared with past 500 years

    Günter Blöschl;Andrea Kiss;Alberto Viglione;Mariano Barriendos

  • Comparative assessment of predictions in ungauged basins – Part 1: Runoff-hydrograph studies

    J. Parajka;J. Parajka;A. Viglione;M. Rogger;J. L. Salinas

  • Uncertainty and multiple objective calibration in regional water balance modelling: case study in 320 Austrian catchments

    J. Parajka;R. Merz;G. Blöschl

  • Flood timescales: Understanding the interplay of climate and catchment processes through comparative hydrology

    Ladislav Gaál;Ján Szolgay;Silvia Kohnová;Juraj Parajka

  • More green and less blue water in the Alps during warmer summers

    Theodoros Mastrotheodoros;Christoforos Pappas;Peter Molnar;Paolo Burlando

  • Seasonal characteristics of flood regimes across the Alpine-Carpathian range.

    J. Parajka;S. Kohnova;G. Balint;M. Barbuc

  • Increasing river floods: fiction or reality?

    Günter Blöschl;Ladislav Gaál;Julia Hall;Andrea Kiss

  • Multivariate Interpolation of Precipitation Using Regularized Spline with Tension

    Jaroslav Hofierka;Juraj Parajka;Helena Mitasova;Lubos Mitas

  • A regional snow-line method for estimating snow cover from MODIS during cloud cover

    J. Parajka;J. Parajka;M. Pepe;A. Rampini;S. Rossi

Frequent Co-Authors

Alberto Viglione
Alberto Viglione Polytechnic University of Turin
Ralf Merz
Ralf Merz Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Attilio Castellarin
Attilio Castellarin University of Bologna
Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Ross Woods
Ross Woods University of Bristol
Berit Arheimer
Berit Arheimer Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Demetris Koutsoyiannis
Demetris Koutsoyiannis National Technical University of Athens
Alberto Montanari
Alberto Montanari University of Bologna
András Bárdossy
András Bárdossy University of Stuttgart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For those passionate about integrating creativity and science, exploring an mfa degree online can complement the analytical skills gained in Earth Science with artistic expertise.

Professionals interested in organizational leadership within scientific institutions may consider advancing through online masters programs in human resource management. These programs equip graduates to manage teams and resources effectively in environmental agencies or research centers.

Earth Science is also accessible to learners at all stages of life, including older adults seeking career changes or personal enrichment. The best degrees for older adults highlight flexible and accommodating programs that balance education with life commitments.

For those interested in information management and research, pursuing accredited education such as mlis ala accredited programs offers specialized training in library and information sciences, crucial for managing scientific data and resources in environmental sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Juraj Parajka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles