World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
12890
World Ranking
4874
National Ranking
407

Michael Wibral publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Wibral sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 151 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael Wibral D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Wibral sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Wibral is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and computer science, with a significant focus on cognitive neuroscience and artificial intelligence.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Michael Wibral's publication record highlights frequent contributions to several key venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS Computational Biology
  • Trends in Neurosciences
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences

Among their recent papers are:

  • Inferring change points in the spread of COVID-19 reveals the effectiveness of interventions, 2020, Science
  • Right inferior frontal gyrus implements motor inhibitory control via beta-band oscillations in humans, 2021, eLife
  • Where is the error? Hierarchical predictive coding through dendritic error computation, 2022, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Bits and pieces: understanding information decomposition from part-whole relationships and formal logic, 2021, Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • Introducing a differentiable measure of pointwise shared information, 2021, Physical review. E

Their research collaborations frequently involve several co-authors with whom they have multiple joint publications. Regular collaborators include:

  • Viola Priesemann
  • Abdullah Makkeh
  • Patricia Wollstadt
  • Aaron J. Gutknecht
  • Edoardo Pinzuti

Best Publications

  • Transfer entropy--a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences

    Raul Vicente;Michael Wibral;Michael Lindner;Gordon Pipa

  • Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research

    Joachim Gross;Sylvain Baillet;Gareth R. Barnes;Richard N. A. Henson

  • The resilience framework as a strategy to combat stress-related disorders

    Raffael Kalisch;Dewleen G. Baker;Dewleen G. Baker;Ulrike Basten;Ulrike Basten;Marco P. Boks

  • Localizing P300 Generators in Visual Target and Distractor Processing: A Combined Event-Related Potential and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study

    Christoph Bledowski;David Prvulovic;Karsten Hoechstetter;Michael Scherg

  • Untangling cross-frequency coupling in neuroscience

    Juhan Aru;Jaan Aru;Viola Priesemann;Michael Wibral

  • Spike avalanches in vivo suggest a driven, slightly subcritical brain state

    Viola Priesemann;Michael Wibral;Michael Wibral;Mario Valderrama;Robert Pröpper

  • Gamma-band activity in human prefrontal cortex codes for the number of relevant items maintained in working memory.

    Frédéric Roux;Michael Wibral;Harald M Mohr;Wolf Singer;Wolf Singer

  • Cortical Oscillatory Activity Is Critical for Working Memory as Revealed by Deficits in Early-Onset Schizophrenia

    Corinna Haenschel;Robert A. Bittner;James Waltz;Fabian Haertling

  • Measuring Information-Transfer Delays

    Michael Wibral;Nicolae Pampu;Viola Priesemann;Felix Siebenhühner;Felix Siebenhühner

  • TRENTOOL: A Matlab open source toolbox to analyse information flow in time series data with transfer entropy

    Michael Lindner;Raul Vicente;Raul Vicente;Raul Vicente;Viola Priesemann;Viola Priesemann;Michael Wibral

  • Local active information storage as a tool to understand distributed neural information processing

    Michael Wibral;Joseph T. Lizier;Sebastian Vögler;Viola Priesemann

  • Neuronal Avalanches Differ from Wakefulness to Deep Sleep – Evidence from Intracranial Depth Recordings in Humans

    Viola Priesemann;Mario Valderrama;Michael Wibral;Michel Le Van Quyen

  • A new look at gamma? High- (>60 Hz) γ-band activity in cortical networks: Function, mechanisms and impairment

    Peter J. Uhlhaas;Gordon Pipa;Gordon Pipa;Gordon Pipa;Sergio Neuenschwander;Michael Wibral

  • Transfer entropy in magnetoencephalographic data: Quantifying information flow in cortical and cerebellar networks

    Michael Wibral;Benjamin Rahm;Maria Rieder;Michael Lindner

  • Directed Information Measures in Neuroscience

    Michael Wibral;Raul Vicente;Joseph T. Lizier

  • The phase of thalamic alpha activity modulates cortical gamma-band activity: evidence from resting-state MEG recordings.

    Frédéric Roux;Michael Wibral;Wolf Singer;Jaan Aru

  • Ketamine Dysregulates the Amplitude and Connectivity of High-Frequency Oscillations in Cortical–Subcortical Networks in Humans: Evidence From Resting-State Magnetoencephalography-Recordings

    Davide Rivolta;Tonio Heidegger;Bertram Scheller;Andreas Sauer

  • Mental Chronometry of Working Memory Retrieval: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Event-Related Potentials Approach

    Christoph Bledowski;Kathrin Cohen Kadosh;Michael Wibral;Benny Rahm

  • Subsampling effects in neuronal avalanche distributions recorded in vivo

    Viola Priesemann;Viola Priesemann;Matthias H J Munk;Michael Wibral

  • Partial information decomposition as a unified approach to the specification of neural goal functions.

    Michael Wibral;Viola Priesemann;Jim W. Kay;Joseph T. Lizier

  • Impaired Gamma-Band Activity during Perceptual Organization in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Evidence for Dysfunctional Network Activity in Frontal-Posterior Cortices

    Limin Sun;Christine Grützner;Sven Bölte;Michael Wibral

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolf Singer
Wolf Singer Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience
Peter J. Uhlhaas
Peter J. Uhlhaas Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Joseph T. Lizier
Joseph T. Lizier University of Sydney
Jochen Kaiser
Jochen Kaiser Goethe University Frankfurt
Joachim Gross
Joachim Gross University of Münster
Lucia Melloni
Lucia Melloni Max Planck Society
Oliver Tüscher
Oliver Tüscher Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Klaus Lieb
Klaus Lieb Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Andreas Reif
Andreas Reif Goethe University Frankfurt
David Edmund Johannes Linden
David Edmund Johannes Linden Maastricht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael Wibral

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles