World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
4765
World Ranking
8396
National Ranking
491

Elizabeth W. Pang publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth W. Pang sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 138 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Elizabeth W. Pang D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth W. Pang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth W. Pang is affiliated with the Hospital for Sick Children in Canada. Their research focus is primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Neurology.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including:

  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neonatal and fetal brain pathology
  • Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Elizabeth W. Pang has published extensively in well-known venues, with repeated contributions in:

  • Human Brain Mapping
  • NeuroImage Clinical
  • Epilepsia
  • Neuropsychologia
  • Nature Neuroscience

Among their recent papers are:

  • Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Somatosensory evoked fields predict response to vagus nerve stimulation, 2020, NeuroImage Clinical
  • Abnormalities in evoked potentials associated with abnormal glycemia and brain injury in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Temporal-plus epilepsy in children: A connectomic analysis in magnetoencephalography, 2020, Epilepsia
  • Presurgical Functional Mapping with Magnetoencephalography, 2020, Neuroimaging Clinics of North America

Frequent collaborators have included Margot J. Taylor, Simeon M. Wong, Hiroshi Otsubo, George M. Ibrahim, and Marlee M. Vandewouw, each coauthoring multiple papers with Elizabeth W. Pang.

Best Publications

  • The role of the insula in speech and language processing.

    Anna Oh;Emma G. Duerden;Elizabeth W. Pang

  • Event-related beamforming: a robust method for presurgical functional mapping using MEG.

    Douglas Cheyne;Andreea C. Bostan;William Gaetz;Elizabeth W. Pang

  • Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research.

    Cyril Pernet;Marta I. Garrido;Alexandre Gramfort;Natasha Maurits

  • Tracking the development of the N1 from age 3 to adulthood: an examination of speech and non-speech stimuli

    Unknown

  • Characterizing magnetic spike sources by using magnetoencephalography-guided neuronavigation in epilepsy surgery in pediatric patients

    Koji Iida;Hiroshi Otsubo;Yuuri Matsumoto;Ayako Ochi

  • Cortical auditory evoked potentials in autism: a review.

    Marie D Bomba;Elizabeth W Pang

  • Low-frequency connectivity is associated with mild traumatic brain injury

    B.T. Dunkley;L. Da Costa;A. Bethune;R. Jetly

  • Resting-state hippocampal connectivity correlates with symptom severity in post-traumatic stress disorder

    B.T. Dunkley;S.M. Doesburg;P.A. Sedge;R.J. Grodecki

  • Neural mechanisms of inhibitory control continue to mature in adolescence

    Anjili S. Vara;Elizabeth W. Pang;Julie Vidal;Evdokia Anagnostou

  • fMRI and MEG in the study of typical and atypical cognitive development.

    M.J. Taylor;E.J. Donner;E.W. Pang;E.W. Pang

  • Localization of Broca's area using verb generation tasks in the MEG: validation against fMRI

    Elizabeth W. Pang;Frank Wang;Marion Malone;Darren S. Kadis

  • Connectomic Profiling Identifies Responders to Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

    Karim Mithani;Mirriam Mikhail;Benjamin R. Morgan;Simeon Wong

  • Relationship between speech motor control and speech intelligibility in children with speech sound disorders

    Aravind Kumar Namasivayam;Margit Pukonen;Debra Goshulak;Vickie Y. Yu

  • Mismatch negativity to speech stimuli in 8-month-old infants and adults

    E.W. Pang;G.E. Edmonds;R. Desjardins;S.C. Khan

  • Characterizing the normal developmental trajectory of expressive language lateralization using magnetoencephalography.

    Darren S. Kadis;Elizabeth W. Pang;Travis Mills;Margot J. Taylor

  • Neuroanatomical features in soldiers with post-traumatic stress disorder

    D. Sussman;E. W. Pang;R. Jetly;B. T. Dunkley

  • Response inhibition in adults and teenagers: Spatiotemporal differences in the prefrontal cortex

    Julie Vidal;Travis Mills;Elizabeth W. Pang;Margot J. Taylor

  • Three-dimensionally reconstructed magnetic source imaging and neuronavigation in pediatric epilepsy: technical note.

    Stephanie A. Holowka;Hiroshi Otsubo;Koji Iida;Elizabeth Pang

  • Neurophysiologic findings of neuronal migration disorders: intrinsic epileptogenicity of focal cortical dysplasia on electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and magnetoencephalography.

    Hiroshi Otsubo;Koji Iida;Makoto Oishi;Chiyuki Okuda

  • Best Practices in Data Analysis and Sharing in Neuroimaging using MEEG

    Cyril Pernet;Marta Garrido;Alexandre Gramfort;Natasha Maurits

  • The Development of Face Recognition; Hippocampal and Frontal Lobe Contributions Determined with MEG

    Margot J. Taylor;Margot J. Taylor;Travis Mills;Elizabeth W. Pang;Elizabeth W. Pang

  • Presurgical localization of primary motor cortex in pediatric patients with brain lesions by the use of spatially filtered magnetoencephalography.

    William Gaetz;Douglas Cheyne;James T. Rutka;James Drake

  • Sound motion evoked magnetic fields.

    Jing Xiang;Sylvester Chuang;Daniel Wilson;Hiroshi Otsubo

Frequent Co-Authors

Margot J. Taylor
Margot J. Taylor University of Toronto
Hiroshi Otsubo
Hiroshi Otsubo University of Toronto
O. Carter Snead
O. Carter Snead University of Toronto
Ayako Ochi
Ayako Ochi University of Toronto
William Gaetz
William Gaetz Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
James T. Rutka
James T. Rutka University of Toronto
Sam M. Doesburg
Sam M. Doesburg Simon Fraser University
Douglas Cheyne
Douglas Cheyne University of Toronto
Evdokia Anagnostou
Evdokia Anagnostou Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Mary Lou Smith
Mary Lou Smith University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience, exploring related online programs can provide flexibility and help you get started faster. Many students look into options such as an accelerated online bachelor's degree to complete their studies quicker and enter the workforce sooner.

When choosing a degree, it’s important to consider earning potential. Some of the best bachelor degrees offer strong job prospects in neuroscience and related fields. In addition, identifying college majors that make the most money can help you align your studies with lucrative career options in healthcare, research, and biotechnology.

Cost is also a key factor for many learners. Fortunately, there are many cheapest online colleges that offer accredited programs and accept federal financial aid (FAFSA), making it more affordable to earn your neuroscience degree online.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth W. Pang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles