World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 41 7921 7315 468 428 193 5764

Elysa Widjaja publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elysa Widjaja between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elysa Widjaja published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2023. 21 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2023. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications
2001 2025

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elysa Widjaja: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 7
2006 7
2007 5
2008 10
2009 9
2010 14
2011 8
2012 6
2013 15
2014 5
2015 12
2016 13
2017 8
2018 12
2019 10
2020 11
2021 15
2022 12
2023 18
2024 9
2025 12
Total 221
Download as CSV

Elysa Widjaja publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elysa Widjaja sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 193 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302 193
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Elysa Widjaja D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elysa Widjaja sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456 41
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Elysa Widjaja is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on pediatric epilepsy and related neurological conditions. Their research output encompasses over 150 publications, with a significant concentration in pediatric health, psychiatry, neurology, cognitive neuroscience, and surgery.

Their work has appeared in numerous reputable scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Epilepsia
  • Neurology
  • Seizure
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics
  • Radiology

Widjaja's research topics broadly cover epilepsy research and treatment, pharmacological effects, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, sinusitis and nasal conditions, fetal and pediatric neurological disorders, along with advanced MRI techniques and applications.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Widjaja include:

  • George M. Ibrahim
  • Elizabeth Donner
  • Mary Lou Smith
  • O. Carter Snead
  • Hiroshi Otsubo

Selected recent papers that Widjaja has contributed to include:

  • "Seizure outcome of pediatric epilepsy surgery," 2020, published in Neurology
  • "Economic burden of epilepsy in children: A population-based matched cohort study in Canada," 2020, published in Epilepsia
  • "Seizure Burden and Neurologic Outcomes After Neonatal Encephalopathy," 2023, published in Neurology (co-authored by Huda M. Alharbi)
  • "Somatosensory evoked fields predict response to vagus nerve stimulation," 2020, published in NeuroImage Clinical (co-authored by Karim Mithani)
  • "Development and validation of machine learning models for prediction of seizure outcome after pediatric epilepsy surgery," 2022, published in Epilepsia (co-authored by Omar Yossofzai)

Widjaja's research often integrates advanced diagnostic and predictive modeling techniques applied to neurological disorders in children, with a focus on improving outcomes after interventions such as pediatric epilepsy surgery. Their body of work explores the clinical, economic, and neurodevelopmental aspects of epilepsy and related brain disorders, drawing on multidisciplinary approaches that include neuroimaging and machine learning.

Best Publications

  • Occipital Lobe Injury and Cortical Visual Outcomes After Neonatal Hypoglycemia

    Emily W. Y. Tam;Elysa Widjaja;Susan I. Blaser;Daune L. MacGregor

  • Neurodevelopmental outcome of infantile spasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Elysa Widjaja;Cristina Go;Blathnaid McCoy;O. Carter Snead

  • Corpus callosotomy in children and the disconnection syndromes: a review

    Andrew Jea;Shobhan Vachhrajani;Elysa Widjaja;Daniel Nilsson

  • Seizure outcome of pediatric epilepsy surgery: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

    Elysa Widjaja;Puneet Jain;Lindsay Demoe;Astrid Guttmann

  • Neurosurgical management of intractable rolandic epilepsy in children: role of resection in eloquent cortex. Clinical article.

    Mony Benifla;Francesco Sala;John Jane;Hiroshi Otsubo

  • The old and the new: supratentorial MR findings in Chiari II malformation.

    Elka Miller;Elysa Widjaja;Susan Blaser;Maureen Dennis

  • Evaluation of subcortical white matter and deep white matter tracts in malformations of cortical development.

    Elysa Widjaja;Susan Blaser;Elka Miller;Andrea Kassner

  • Subcortical Alterations in Tissue Microstructure Adjacent to Focal Cortical Dysplasia: Detection at Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging by Using Magnetoencephalographic Dipole Cluster Localization

    Elysa Widjaja;Siria Zarei Mahmoodabadi;Hiroshi Otsubo;O. Carter Snead

  • Vigabatrin-associated reversible MRI signal changes in patients with infantile spasms.

    Aphrodite Dracopoulos;Aphrodite Dracopoulos;Elysa Widjaja;Charles Raybaud;Carol A. Westall;Carol A. Westall

  • Cost-effectiveness of pediatric epilepsy surgery compared to medical treatment in children with intractable epilepsy.

    Elysa Widjaja;Bing Li;Corrine Davies Schinkel;Lisa Puchalski Ritchie;Lisa Puchalski Ritchie

  • Resective Epilepsy Surgery for Tuberous Sclerosis in Children: Determining Predictors of Seizure Outcomes in a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

    Aria Fallah;Aria Fallah;Shaun D Rodgers;Alexander G Weil;Sumeet Vadera

  • Characteristics of MEG and MRI between Taylor's focal cortical dysplasia (type II) and other cortical dysplasia: Surgical outcome after complete resection of MEG spike source and MR lesion in pediatric cortical dysplasia

    Elysa Widjaja;Hiroshi Otsubo;Charles Raybaud;Ayako Ochi

  • Connectomic Profiling Identifies Responders to Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

    Karim Mithani;Mirriam Mikhail;Benjamin R. Morgan;Simeon Wong

  • Presurgical thalamocortical connectivity is associated with response to vagus nerve stimulation in children with intractable epilepsy.

    George M. Ibrahim;Priya Sharma;Ann Hyslop;Magno R. Guillen

  • Abnormal Functional Network Connectivity among Resting-State Networks in Children with Frontal Lobe Epilepsy

    E. Widjaja;M. Zamyadi;C. Raybaud;O.C. Snead

  • Bilateral diffusion tensor abnormalities of temporal lobe and cingulate gyrus white matter in children with temporal lobe epilepsy

    Daniel Nilsson;Cristina Go;James T. Rutka;Bertil Rydenhag

  • 2D time-of-flight MR venography in neonates : Anatomy and pitfalls

    E Widjaja;M Shroff;S Blaser;S Laughlin

  • Widespread cortical thinning in children with frontal lobe epilepsy

    Elysa Widjaja;Sina Zarei Mahmoodabadi;O. Carter Snead;Abeer Almehdar

  • White matter integrity and core cognitive function in children diagnosed with sickle cell disease.

    Nadia Scantlebury;Donald Mabbott;Laura Janzen;Conrad Rockel

  • Diffusion tensor imaging identifies changes in normal-appearing white matter within the epileptogenic zone in tuberous sclerosis complex

    Elysa Widjaja;Gustavo Simao;Sina Zarei Mahmoodabadi;Ayako Ochi

  • Cerebellar abnormalities on proton MR spectroscopy in gluten ataxia

    I D Wilkinson;M Hadjivassiliou;J M Dickson;L Wallis

  • Development and dysgenesis of the cerebral cortex: malformations of cortical development.

    Charles Raybaud;Elysa Widjaja

  • FDG‐PET and magnetoencephalography in presurgical workup of children with localization‐related nonlesional epilepsy

    Elysa Widjaja;Amer Shammas;Reza Vali;Hiroshi Otsubo

Frequent Co-Authors

O. Carter Snead
O. Carter Snead University of Toronto
James T. Rutka
James T. Rutka University of Toronto
Ayako Ochi
Ayako Ochi University of Toronto
Hiroshi Otsubo
Hiroshi Otsubo University of Toronto
Mary Lou Smith
Mary Lou Smith University of Toronto
Elizabeth J. Donner
Elizabeth J. Donner University of Toronto
James M. Drake
James M. Drake University of Toronto
Shelly K. Weiss
Shelly K. Weiss University of Toronto
Mark A. Ferro
Mark A. Ferro University of Waterloo
Rahim Moineddin
Rahim Moineddin University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in Neuroscience but want flexible study options, there are several online degrees and career pathways closely related to this field. Psychology is a foundational area that overlaps with neuroscience, and an online psychology degree cheap can be a budget-friendly way to get started. These programs provide a solid background in human behavior, mental health, and cognition.

For those drawn to helping professions, social work offers rewarding opportunities, with the easiest social work programs to get into offering accessible entry points. You might also consider becoming a clinical psychologist through psyd psychology online programs, which focus on practical clinical skills and mental health care.

Another in-demand field is marriage and family therapy. Today, many universities offer online mft programs that allow you to complete your degree quickly and efficiently. Each of these pathways provides a strong complement to neuroscience studies and opens doors to a variety of fulfilling careers in healthcare, counseling, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Elysa Widjaja

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles