World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 106 6404 6024 3412 3164 391 53437

Jonathan Cohen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan Cohen between 1958 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan Cohen published across 68 years, from 1958 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2006. 17 of the 453 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2006. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 19 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 20 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 18 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 4 publications
1958 2025

453 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan Cohen: publications per year, 1958 to 2025
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 1
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 2
1987 3
1988 0
1989 0
1990 3
1991 3
1992 5
1993 11
1994 8
1995 5
1996 19
1997 14
1998 15
1999 20
2000 12
2001 15
2002 16
2003 16
2004 18
2005 24
2006 31
2007 16
2008 6
2009 7
2010 14
2011 11
2012 12
2013 2
2014 13
2015 17
2016 13
2017 15
2018 6
2019 19
2020 13
2021 11
2022 4
2023 14
2024 13
2025 4
Total 453
Download as CSV

Jonathan Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Cohen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 391 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 391
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan Cohen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 106–107 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541 106
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan Cohen is affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States.

Their research primarily centers on medicine, with a focus on various specialized subfields including oncology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, immunology, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The main topics covered in Cohen's work include:

  • Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Esophageal and GI Pathology
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

Cohen has published extensively, with a notable number of papers in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology, and Journal of Reproductive Immunology. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (15 publications)
  • American Journal of Reproductive Immunology (3 publications)
  • Journal of Reproductive Immunology (3 publications)
  • Blood (2 publications)
  • La Revue de Médecine Interne (2 publications)

Prominent recent papers authored by Cohen or those they have worked on include:

  • Endometriosis with infertility: A comprehensive review on the role of immune deregulation and immunomodulation therapy, 2020, American Journal of Reproductive Immunology
  • Intralipid therapy for unexplained recurrent miscarriage and implantation failure: Case-series and literature review, 2020, European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
  • Chronic Villitis of unknown etiology (VUE): Obstetrical features, outcome and treatment, 2021, Journal of Reproductive Immunology
  • Consensus statements on the current landscape of artificial intelligence applications in endoscopy, addressing roadblocks, and advancing artificial intelligence in gastroenterology, 2024, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
  • Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on endoscopy practice: results of a cross-sectional survey from the New York metropolitan area, 2020, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Frequent collaborators in their work include Tyler M. Berzin, Peter V. Draganov, Lauren Khanna, A. Mékinian, and Rajesh N. Keswani, with multiple coauthored publications between them.

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: Impact of ethnicity

    Jeffrey D. Browning;Lidia S. Szczepaniak;Robert Dobbins;Pamela Nuremberg

  • Quality indicators for colonoscopy

    Douglas K. Rex;John L. Petrini;Todd Huntley Baron;Amitabh Chak

  • Low LDL cholesterol in individuals of African descent resulting from frequent nonsense mutations in PCSK9.

    Jonathan Cohen;Alexander Pertsemlidis;Ingrid K Kotowski;Randall Graham

  • Quality indicators for colonoscopy.

    Douglas K. Rex;Philip S. Schoenfeld;Jonathan Cohen;Irving M. Pike

  • GATA4 mutations cause human congenital heart defects and reveal an interaction with TBX5

    Vidu Garg;Irfan S. Kathiriya;Robert Barnes;Marie K. Schluterman

  • An Apolipoprotein Influencing Triglycerides in Humans and Mice Revealed by Comparative Sequencing

    Len A. Pennacchio;Michael Olivier;Jaroslav A. Hubacek;Jonathan C. Cohen

  • The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit.

    Thierry Calandra;Jonathan Cohen

  • Disruption of Abcg5 and Abcg8 in mice reveals their crucial role in biliary cholesterol secretion

    Liqing Yu;Robert E. Hammer;Jia Li-Hawkins;Klaus von Bergmann

  • Overexpression of ABCG5 and ABCG8 promotes biliary cholesterol secretion and reduces fractional absorption of dietary cholesterol

    Liqing Yu;Jia Li-Hawkins;Robert E. Hammer;Knut E. Berge

  • Molecular biology of PCSK9: its role in LDL metabolism

    Jay D. Horton;Jonathan C. Cohen;Helen H. Hobbs

  • Monogenic hypercholesterolemia: new insights in pathogenesis and treatment

    Daniel J. Rader;Jonathan Cohen;Helen H. Hobbs

  • A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease

    Ruth Mcpherson;Alexander Pertsemlidis;Nihan Kavaslar;Alexandre Stewart

  • Prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension in critically ill patients: a multicentre epidemiological study.

    Manu L. N. G. Malbrain;Davide Chiumello;Paolo Pelosi;Alexander Wilmer

  • Molecular Characterization of Loss-of-Function Mutations in PCSK9 and Identification of a Compound Heterozygote

    Zhenze Zhao;Yetsa Tuakli-Wosornu;Thomas A. Lagace;Lisa Kinch

  • Autosomal recessive hypercholesterolemia caused by mutations in a putative LDL receptor adaptor protein.

    Christine Kim Garcia;Kenneth Wilund;Marcello Arca;Giovanni Zuliani

  • The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps.

    Douglas K. Rex;Charles Kahi;Michael O'Brien;T.R. Levin

  • The tight calorie control study (TICACOS): a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot study of nutritional support in critically ill patients

    Pierre Singer;Pierre Singer;Ronit Anbar;Ronit Anbar;Jonathan Cohen;Jonathan Cohen;Haim Shapiro

  • A Spectrum of PCSK9 Alleles Contributes to Plasma Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol

    Ingrid K. Kotowski;Alexander Pertsemlidis;Amy Luke;Richard S. Cooper;Richard S. Cooper

  • Population-based resequencing of ANGPTL4 uncovers variations that reduce triglycerides and increase HDL

    Stefano Romeo;Len A Pennacchio;Len A Pennacchio;Yunxin Fu;Eric Boerwinkle

  • A common allele on chromosome 9 associated with coronary heart disease

    Ruth McPherson;Alexander Pertsemlidis;Nihan Kavaslar;Alexandre Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen H. Hobbs
Helen H. Hobbs The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Scott M. Grundy
Scott M. Grundy The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Len A. Pennacchio
Len A. Pennacchio Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Ruth McPherson
Ruth McPherson University of Ottawa
Bret T. Petersen
Bret T. Petersen Mayo Clinic
Steven M. Opal
Steven M. Opal Brown University
Jay D. Horton
Jay D. Horton The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Thomas J. Evans
Thomas J. Evans University of Glasgow
Peter B. Cotton
Peter B. Cotton Medical University of South Carolina
Shiranee Sriskandan
Shiranee Sriskandan Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those considering alternative routes into healthcare or aiming to advance their current qualifications, there are several flexible online programs available in the USA. Many registered nurses are turning to rn to bsn programs that do not require clinical hours, making it easier to balance work and study while increasing their professional credentials.

Nurses seeking to reach the highest clinical ranks can opt for the fastest online dnp programs, allowing completion of doctorate-level studies in a shorter timeframe. Some professionals prefer easy dnp programs that are designed with a more accessible structure, ideal for working nurses or those with significant personal commitments.

If you are starting your nursing journey, a 9 month lpn program may be the quickest way to enter the workforce. These fast-track programs help students gain hands-on experience and qualify for licensure rapidly.

Exploring these online pathways can provide flexibility and unique opportunities as you pursue a rewarding medical career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles