World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
66683
World Ranking
4170
National Ranking
253

Maria Jesus Martin publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Jesus Martin sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 145 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Maria Jesus Martin D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Jesus Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Jesus Martin is affiliated with the European Bioinformatics Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the domain of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a strong emphasis on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetics, and Artificial Intelligence as subfields. This interdisciplinary approach supports Maria Jesus Martin's contributions to bioinformatics and molecular biology research.

They have co-authored a substantial number of publications with several frequent collaborators, including Sandra Orchard, Tunca Doğan, Alex Bateman, Emily Bowler-Barnett, and Rabie Saidi. These collaborations reflect a network of researchers active in computational biology and proteomics.

Maria Jesus Martin's work has been published predominantly in well-regarded scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Bioinformatics
  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Bioinformatics Advances

The scientist's recent papers demonstrate focus on protein knowledgebases and molecular interaction data, with notable examples including:

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021, published in 2020 in Nucleic Acids Research
  • UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023, published in 2022 in Nucleic Acids Research
  • UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025, published in 2024 in Nucleic Acids Research
  • The IntAct database: efficient access to fine-grained molecular interaction data, published in 2021 in Nucleic Acids Research
  • Annotation of biologically relevant ligands in UniProtKB using ChEBI, published in 2022 in Bioinformatics

The main topics of Maria Jesus Martin's research include the following areas:

  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

This profile indicates a strong engagement with advanced computational techniques and bioinformatics tools to analyze proteins and their interactions at the molecular level. The combination of machine learning applications and proteomics demonstrates an integration of modern computational methods with experimental biology. Maria Jesus Martin's publication record shows sustained contributions to the development and dissemination of knowledge resources such as UniProt, which are fundamental for biological research globally.

Best Publications

  • UniProt: A hub for protein information

    Alex Bateman;Maria Jesus Martin;Claire O'Donovan;Michele Magrane

  • UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase

    Rolf Apweiler;Amos Bairoch;Cathy H. Wu;Winona C. Barker

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021

    Alex Bateman;Maria-Jesus Martin;Sandra Orchard

  • The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong

    S. Carbon;E. Douglass;N. Dunn;B. Good

  • The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003

    Brigitte Boeckmann;Amos Bairoch;Rolf Apweiler;Marie-Claude Blatter

  • The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)

    Amos Bairoch;Rolf Apweiler;Cathy H. Wu;Winona C. Barker

  • The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine

    Seth Carbon;Eric Douglass;Benjamin M Good

  • Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)

    R Apweiler;A Bateman;MJ Martin;C O'Donovan

  • The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt): an expanding universe of protein information

    Cathy H. Wu;Rolf Apweiler;Amos Bairoch;Darren A. Natale

  • Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource

    Anne Morgat;Rolf Apweiler;Maria-Jesus Martin;C. O'Donovan

  • The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010

    R Apweiler;MJ Martin;C O'Donovan;M Magrane

  • Uniclust databases of clustered and deeply annotated protein sequences and alignments

    Milot Mirdita;Lars von den Driesch;Lars von den Driesch;Clovis Galiez;Maria Jesus Martin

  • Gene ontology annotations and resources

    Blake Ja;Dolan M;Drabkin H

  • The GOA database: Gene Ontology annotation updates for 2015

    Rachael P. Huntley;Tony Sawford;Prudence Mutowo-Meullenet;Aleksandra Shypitsyna

  • Infrastructure for the life sciences: design and implementation of the UniProt website

    Eric Jain;Amos Bairoch;Amos Bairoch;Severine Duvaud;Isabelle Phan

  • Open Targets: a platform for therapeutic target identification and validation.

    Gautier Koscielny;Peter An;Denise Carvalho-Silva;Jennifer A. Cham

  • The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011

    Emily C. Dimmer;Rachael P. Huntley;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Tony Sawford

  • Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: methods, tools and databases.

    Ahmet Sureyya Rifaioglu;Heval Atas;Maria Jesus Martin;Rengul Cetin-Atalay

  • An expanded evaluation of protein function prediction methods shows an improvement in accuracy

    Yuxiang Jiang;Tal Ronnen Oron;Wyatt T. Clark;Asma R. Bankapur

  • The CAFA challenge reports improved protein function prediction and new functional annotations for hundreds of genes through experimental screens

    Naihui Zhou;Yuxiang Jiang;Timothy R. Bergquist;Alexandra J. Lee

  • SIFTS: Structure Integration with Function, Taxonomy and Sequences resource

    Sameer Velankar;Jose M. Dana;Julius O. B. Jacobsen;Glen van Ginkel

Frequent Co-Authors

Claire O'Donovan
Claire O'Donovan European Bioinformatics Institute
Rolf Apweiler
Rolf Apweiler European Bioinformatics Institute
Sandra Orchard
Sandra Orchard European Bioinformatics Institute
Christophe Dessimoz
Christophe Dessimoz University College London
Nicole Redaschi
Nicole Redaschi Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Henning Hermjakob
Henning Hermjakob European Bioinformatics Institute
Alex Bateman
Alex Bateman European Bioinformatics Institute
Elisabeth Gasteiger
Elisabeth Gasteiger Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Cathy H. Wu
Cathy H. Wu University of Delaware
Amos Marc Bairoch
Amos Marc Bairoch Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Computer Science can open doors to a wide variety of rewarding careers. Many students consider programs such as electrical engineering due to overlapping skills in technology and innovation. It's also important to compare electrical engineering online tuition costs with those of computer science to make informed decisions about your educational investment.

For those eager to jumpstart their careers quickly, earning quick certifications that pay well is an efficient way to gain job-ready skills and increase your earning potential. If advancing your education is your goal, you might also be interested in the quickest online masters degree programs, many of which are available in tech and engineering fields.

When selecting a pathway, aiming for the most worthwhile masters degrees is key to ensuring long-term career success. These degrees are not only in high demand but can also lead to specialized positions and increased job security.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Jesus Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles