World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
4393
World Ranking
10909
National Ranking
67

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
4661
World Ranking
9451
National Ranking
33

Michael Colombo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Colombo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 104 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael Colombo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Colombo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Colombo is affiliated with the University of Otago in New Zealand. Their research spans major fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with notable emphasis on subfields including Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, and Developmental Biology.

The topics central to their work cover a range of subjects such as Primate Behavior and Ecology, Animal Behavior and Reproduction, Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research, Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior, Neural dynamics and brain function, Visual perception and processing mechanisms, and Memory and Neural Mechanisms.

Michael Colombo has contributed to various academic journals, frequently publishing in:

  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Animal Sentience
  • Learning and Motivation
  • Progress in Neurobiology

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Michael Colombo include:

  • "The functional architecture, receptive field characteristics, and representation of objects in the visual network of the pigeon brain" (2020) published in Progress in Neurobiology
  • "Extending the null hypothesis to invertebrate pain sentience" (2022) published in Animal Sentience
  • "Mirror mirror on the wall, it's not the mark I care about at all" (2022) published in Learning and Motivation
  • "Pigeon nidopallium caudolaterale, entopallium, and mesopallium ventrolaterale neural responses during categorisation of Monet and Picasso paintings" (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Are There Differences in 'Intelligence' Between Nonhuman Species? The Role of Contextual Variables" (2020) published in Frontiers in Psychology

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Damian Scarf
  • Eva Kakrada
  • Catrona Anderson
  • Blake Porter
  • William Clark

Best Publications

  • Is the avian hippocampus a functional homologue of the mammalian hippocampus

    M Colombo;N Broadbent

  • The Development of Implicit and Explicit Memory

    Carolyn K. Rovee-Collier;Harlene Hayne;Michael Colombo

  • Representation of serial order in monkeys (Cebus apella).

    M. R. D'Amato;Michael Colombo

  • Extent and limits of the matching concept in monkeys (Cebus apella).

    M. R. D'Amato;David P. Salmon;Michael Colombo

  • Neural ensemble coding in inferior temporal cortex

    P. M. Gochin;M. Colombo;G. A. Dorfman;G. L. Gerstein

  • Pigeons on Par with Primates in Numerical Competence

    Damian Scarf;Harlene Hayne;Michael Colombo

  • Functional Differentiation Along the Anterior-Posterior Axis of the Hippocampus in Monkeys

    Michael Colombo;Tom Fernandez;Katsuki Nakamura;Charles G. Gross

  • Social evaluation or simple association? Simple associations may explain moral reasoning in infants.

    Damian Scarf;Kana Imuta;Michael Colombo;Harlene Hayne

  • To have and to hold: episodic memory in 3- and 4-year-old children.

    Damian Scarf;Julien Gross;Michael Colombo;Harlene Hayne

  • Auditory association cortex lesions impair auditory short-term memory in monkeys

    Michael Colombo;Michael R. D'Amato;Hillary R. Rodman;Charles G. Gross

  • Single Units in the Pigeon Brain Integrate Reward Amount and Time-to-Reward in an Impulsive Choice Task

    Tobias Kalenscher;Sabine Windmann;Bettina Diekamp;Jonas Rose

  • Neural Correlates of Executive Control in the Avian Brain

    Jonas Rose;Michael Colombo

  • Responses of inferior temporal cortex and hippocampal neurons during delayed matching to sample in monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

    Michael Colombo;Charles G. Gross

  • Auditory matching-to-sample in monkeys (Cebus apella)

    M. R. D’Amato;Michael Colombo

  • The symbolic distance effect in monkeys (Cebus apella)

    M. R. D’Amato;M. Colombo

  • Serial learning with wild card items by monkeys (Cebus apella): implications for knowledge of ordinal position.

    M. R. D'Amato;Michael Colombo

  • The effects of hippocampal and area parahippocampalis lesions in pigeons: II. Concurrent discrimination and spatial memory.

    Michael Colombo;Samantha Cawley;Nicola Broadbent

  • A comparison of visual and auditory short-term memory in monkeys (Cebus apella).

    Michael Colombo;M. R. D'Amato

  • Interpreting visual preferences in the visual paired-comparison task.

    Jenny Richmond;Michael Colombo;Harlene Hayne

  • The Effects of Superior Temporal Cortex Lesions on the Processing and Retention of Auditory Information in Monkeys (Cebus apella)

    Michael Colombo;Hillary R. Rodman;Charles G. Gross

Frequent Co-Authors

Harlene Hayne
Harlene Hayne Curtin University
Carolyn Rovee-Collier
Carolyn Rovee-Collier Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Charles G. Gross
Charles G. Gross Princeton University
Onur Güntürkün
Onur Güntürkün Ruhr University Bochum
Herbert S. Terrace
Herbert S. Terrace Columbia University
Michael C. Corballis
Michael C. Corballis University of Auckland
Thomas R. Zentall
Thomas R. Zentall University of Kentucky
J. Bruce Overmier
J. Bruce Overmier University of Minnesota
James S. Magnuson
James S. Magnuson University of Connecticut
Elaine Reese
Elaine Reese University of Otago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career opportunities. Students who enjoy working directly with individuals may wish to consider programs such as the best online psyd programs for advanced training in psychology. For those interested in counseling and family therapy, there are accelerated mft programs online that lead to rewarding roles helping families and couples.

Many who study neuroscience find value in fast-tracking their education. There are numerous accelerated online degrees that allow students to complete their studies at a quicker pace—ideal for those looking to enter the workforce sooner. Additionally, when considering your future, reviewing the highest paying majors can provide insight into lucrative career options related to neuroscience and behavioral sciences.

Each of these pathways offers unique advantages and can be tailored to suit diverse interests, goals, and timelines. As the field evolves, flexible online options make it easier than ever to align education with your personal and professional aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Colombo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles