World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
UK
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
100
Citations
104770
World Ranking
356
National Ranking
24

Henning Hermjakob publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henning Hermjakob sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 347 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Henning Hermjakob D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Henning Hermjakob sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Henning Hermjakob is affiliated with the European Bioinformatics Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research spans primarily the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in molecular biology, information systems and management, spectroscopy, information systems, and computational theory and mathematics.

The scientist's work covers a range of main research topics, including:

  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Research Data Management Practices

Henning Hermjakob has published extensively, with a selection of recent papers including:

  • The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase 2024, 2023, Nucleic Acids Research
  • iProX in 2021: connecting proteomics data sharing with big data, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research
  • MEMOTE for standardized genome-scale metabolic model testing, 2020, Nature Biotechnology
  • The IntAct database: efficient access to fine-grained molecular interaction data, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers in their field. Regular co-authors include:

  • Rahuman S. Malik-Sheriff
  • Sandra Orchard
  • Ruedi Aebersold
  • Yu-Ju Chen
  • Terence Chuen Wai Poon

Henning Hermjakob publishes mainly in a number of venues known for their contributions to biology, bioinformatics, and proteomics. Frequent publication venues comprise:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PROTEOMICS
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Bioinformatics

Best Publications

  • Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome.

    Eric S. Lander;Lauren M. Linton;Bruce Birren;Chad Nusbaum

  • The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase.

    Antonio Fabregat;Konstantinos Sidiropoulos;Phani V. Garapati;Marc Gillespie;Marc Gillespie

  • The Reactome pathway knowledgebase

    Unknown

  • 2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools

    Juan Antonio Vizcaíno;Attila Csordas;Noemi Del-Toro;José A. Dianes

  • ProteomeXchange provides globally coordinated proteomics data submission and dissemination

    Juan A. Vizcaíno;Eric W Deutsch;Rui Wang;Attila Csordas

  • The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase

    Unknown

  • The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2022.

    Marc Gillespie;Marc Gillespie;Bijay Jassal;Ralf Stephan;Marija Milacic

  • The PRoteomics IDEntifications (PRIDE) database and associated tools: status in 2013.

    Juan Antonio Vizcaíno;Richard G. Côté;Attila Csordas;José A. Dianes

  • The reactome pathway knowledgebase

    Unknown

  • Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes

    David Croft;Gavin O'Kelly;Guanming Wu;Robin Haw

  • The MIntAct project--IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases.

    Sandra Orchard;Mais Ammari;Bruno Aranda;Lionel Breuza

  • Databases on transcriptional regulation: TRANSFAC, TRRD and COMPEL

    T. Heinemeyer;E. Wingender;I. Reuter;H. Hermjakob

  • iProX: an integrated proteome resource.

    Jie Ma;Tao Chen;Songfeng Wu;Chunyuan Yang

  • The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

    Dawn Field;George Garrity;Tanya Gray;Norman Morrison

  • The InterPro database, an integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites

    Rolf Apweiler;Terri K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch;Alex Bateman

  • The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012

    Samuel Kerrien;Bruno Aranda;Lionel Breuza;Alan Bridge

  • IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database

    Henning Hermjakob;Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi;Chris Lewington;Sugath Mudali

  • Reactome pathway analysis: a high-performance in-memory approach

    Antonio Fabregat;Konstantinos Sidiropoulos;Guilherme Viteri;Oscar Forner

  • Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes.

    Lisa Matthews;Gopal Gopinath;Marc Gillespie;Michael Caudy

  • A common open representation of mass spectrometry data and its application to proteomics research

    Patrick G A Pedrioli;Jimmy K Eng;Robert Hubley;Mathijs Vogelzang

  • IntAct—open source resource for molecular interaction data

    Samuel Kerrien;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Bruno Aranda;I. Bancarz

  • The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2017: supporting the cultural change in proteomics public data deposition

    Eric W. Deutsch;Attila Csordas;Zhi Sun;Andrew Jarnuczak

  • The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010

    Bruno Aranda;P. Achuthan;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Irina M. Armean

Frequent Co-Authors

Sandra Orchard
Sandra Orchard European Bioinformatics Institute
Rolf Apweiler
Rolf Apweiler European Bioinformatics Institute
Juan Antonio Vizcaíno
Juan Antonio Vizcaíno European Bioinformatics Institute
Andrew R. Jones
Andrew R. Jones University of Liverpool
Eric W. Deutsch
Eric W. Deutsch University of Washington
Lincoln Stein
Lincoln Stein Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Yasset Perez-Riverol
Yasset Perez-Riverol European Bioinformatics Institute
Peipei Ping
Peipei Ping University of California, Los Angeles
Chris F. Taylor
Chris F. Taylor European Bioinformatics Institute
Peter D'Eustachio
Peter D'Eustachio New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career and educational opportunities. Many students consider online options for flexibility and affordability as they advance their expertise and boost career prospects.

Those seeking leadership positions may pursue a 1 year executive mba online, which can fast-track managerial roles in tech-driven organizations. For those interested in information management or knowledge curation, the most affordable online mlis programs provide specialized skills relevant to both public and digital libraries.

Broader career advancement often requires a master's degree. With many online affordable master's programs in technology and related fields, learners can gain specialized knowledge without high tuition costs. For those aspiring to top-tier leadership roles, a phd in leadership online is an ideal pathway, combining research, theory, and practical skills.

Whether your passion lies in executive management, digital information, or organizational leadership, there are flexible online degrees that align with your professional goals in the evolving field of Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Henning Hermjakob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles