World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
62
Citations
57973
World Ranking
2815
National Ranking
163

Sandra Orchard publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Orchard sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 171 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Sandra Orchard D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sandra Orchard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sandra Orchard is affiliated with the European Bioinformatics Institute in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily resides in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology. Additional areas of specialization include Spectroscopy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics centered on computational and experimental approaches in biology. Key subjects include Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction, and Machine Learning in Bioinformatics.

Sandra Orchard has contributed to several publications in prominent venues. Frequent publication platforms include Nucleic Acids Research, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Bioinformatics, the Journal of Proteome Research, and Current Protocols.

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021 (2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023 (2022, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine (2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2025 (2024, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • The IntAct database: efficient access to fine-grained molecular interaction data (2021, Nucleic Acids Research)

Frequent collaborators in Sandra Orchard's research include Henning Hermjakob, Pablo Porras, Livia Perfetto, María Martin, and Noemí del-Toro. These co-authors have contributed significantly across multiple projects.

Best Publications

  • UniProt: A hub for protein information

    Alex Bateman;Maria Jesus Martin;Claire O'Donovan;Michele Magrane

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021

    Alex Bateman;Maria-Jesus Martin;Sandra Orchard

  • The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong

    S. Carbon;E. Douglass;N. Dunn;B. Good

  • The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine

    Seth Carbon;Eric Douglass;Benjamin M Good

  • Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)

    R Apweiler;A Bateman;MJ Martin;C O'Donovan

  • The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023

    Unknown

  • The MIntAct project--IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases.

    Sandra Orchard;Mais Ammari;Bruno Aranda;Lionel Breuza

  • The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features

    Nicola J Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K Attwood;Amos Marc Bairoch

  • The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012

    Samuel Kerrien;Bruno Aranda;Lionel Breuza;Alan Bridge

  • IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database

    Henning Hermjakob;Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi;Chris Lewington;Sugath Mudali

  • Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource

    Anne Morgat;Rolf Apweiler;Maria-Jesus Martin;C. O'Donovan

  • IntAct—open source resource for molecular interaction data

    Samuel Kerrien;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Bruno Aranda;I. Bancarz

  • The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010

    R Apweiler;MJ Martin;C O'Donovan;M Magrane

  • The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010

    Bruno Aranda;P. Achuthan;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Irina M. Armean

  • The HUPO PSI's molecular interaction format--a community standard for the representation of protein interaction data.

    Henning Hermjakob;Luisa Montecchi-Palazzi;Gary Bader;Jérôme Wojcik

  • InterPro, progress and status in 2005

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • Promoting coherent minimum reporting guidelines for biological and biomedical investigations: the MIBBI project

    Chris F. Taylor;Chris F. Taylor;Dawn Field;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Susanna Assunta Sansone;Jan Aerts

  • New developments in the InterPro database

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • Protein interaction data curation: the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium

    Sandra Orchard;Samuel Kerrien;Sara Abbani;Bruno Aranda

  • Non-coding RNA regulatory networks.

    Simona Panni;Ruth C. Lovering;Pablo Porras;Sandra Orchard

  • The SDR (short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase and related enzymes) nomenclature initiative

    Bengt Persson;Yvonne Kallberg;Yvonne Kallberg;James E. Bray;Elspeth Bruford

  • InterPro: An integrated documentation resource for protein families, domains and functional sites

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Terri K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Hermjakob
Henning Hermjakob European Bioinformatics Institute
Rolf Apweiler
Rolf Apweiler European Bioinformatics Institute
Eric W. Deutsch
Eric W. Deutsch University of Washington
Maria Jesus Martin
Maria Jesus Martin European Bioinformatics Institute
Igor Jurisica
Igor Jurisica University Health Network
Chris F. Taylor
Chris F. Taylor European Bioinformatics Institute
Alan Bridge
Alan Bridge Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Gianni Cesareni
Gianni Cesareni University of Rome Tor Vergata
Andrew R. Jones
Andrew R. Jones University of Liverpool
Alex Bateman
Alex Bateman European Bioinformatics Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, it's helpful to consider related online degree options for flexible and accelerated learning. Many learners seek degrees that can save time and money while opening doors to well-paid tech careers.

For those interested in business and technology leadership, cheap mba online programs offer an affordable path to elevate your credentials. If you’re hoping to earn your degree quickly, there are 1 year online masters programs in fields like data science, IT, and computer science.

If speed is a top priority, explore the fastest degree to get online—many of these programs are designed to get you working sooner in high-demand areas. Additionally, online artificial intelligence continues to grow in popularity. Compare programs with specialized online ai degree programs to further your expertise in this cutting-edge field.

Whether you want to upskill rapidly or dive deep into advanced topics, today’s online degree pathways provide diverse options to launch or advance your tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Sandra Orchard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles