World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 49 2586 2337 46 42 96 56593

Alan Bridge publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alan Bridge between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alan Bridge published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2019. 13 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2019. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1998 2025

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alan Bridge: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 2
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 3
2008 1
2009 3
2010 5
2011 1
2012 10
2013 5
2014 7
2015 4
2016 7
2017 3
2018 5
2019 19
2020 7
2021 7
2022 7
2023 4
2024 7
2025 6
Total 115
Download as CSV

Alan Bridge publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Bridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 87–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 96 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125 96
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Alan Bridge D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Bridge sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118 49
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Alan Bridge is affiliated with the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a particular emphasis on Molecular Biology. Additional subfields of study include Artificial Intelligence, Spectroscopy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's main research topics include Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications, Machine Learning in Bioinformatics, Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction, and Computational Drug Discovery Methods.

Alan Bridge has published extensively in several academic venues, with the most frequent publication venues as follows:

  • Nucleic Acids Research (11 publications)
  • Bioinformatics (3 publications)
  • Database (2 publications)
  • Metabolomics (2 publications)
  • GigaScience (2 publications)

Recent papers contributing to their field include:

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research
  • UniProt: the Universal Protein Knowledgebase in 2023, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research
  • InterPro in 2022, 2022, Nucleic Acids Research
  • The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023, 2023, Genetics
  • The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on, 2020, Nucleic Acids Research

Frequent co-authors in their research projects include:

  • Nicole Redaschi
  • Jerven Bolleman
  • Alex Bateman
  • Elisabeth Coudert
  • Anne Morgat

Best Publications

  • UniProt: A hub for protein information

    Alex Bateman;Maria Jesus Martin;Claire O'Donovan;Michele Magrane

  • UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021

    Alex Bateman;Maria-Jesus Martin;Sandra Orchard

  • The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine

    Seth Carbon;Eric Douglass;Benjamin M Good

  • Activities at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)

    R Apweiler;A Bateman;MJ Martin;C O'Donovan

  • The InterPro protein families and domains database: 20 years on.

    Matthias Blum;Hsin Yu Chang;Sara Chuguransky;Tiago Grego

  • InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations

    Robert D. Finn;Teresa K. Attwood;Patricia C. Babbitt;Alex Bateman

  • New and continuing developments at PROSITE

    Christian J. A. Sigrist;Edouard de Castro;Lorenzo Cerutti;Béatrice A. Cuche

  • InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations.

    Alex L. Mitchell;Teresa K. Attwood;Patricia C. Babbitt;Matthias Blum

  • Induction of an interferon response by RNAi vectors in mammalian cells

    Alan J Bridge;Stephanie Pebernard;Annick Ducraux;Anne-Laure Nicoulaz

  • Ongoing and future developments at the Universal Protein Resource

    Anne Morgat;Rolf Apweiler;Maria-Jesus Martin;C. O'Donovan

  • IntAct—open source resource for molecular interaction data

    Samuel Kerrien;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Bruno Aranda;I. Bancarz

  • The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) in 2010

    R Apweiler;MJ Martin;C O'Donovan;M Magrane

  • UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to Use the Entry View.

    Emmanuel Boutet;Damien Lieberherr;Michael Tognolli;Michel Schneider

  • Gene ontology annotations and resources

    Blake Ja;Dolan M;Drabkin H

  • Protein interaction data curation: the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium

    Sandra Orchard;Samuel Kerrien;Sara Abbani;Bruno Aranda

  • The UniProt-GO Annotation database in 2011

    Emily C. Dimmer;Rachael P. Huntley;Yasmin Alam-Faruque;Tony Sawford

  • A potential role for integrins in host cell entry by SARS-CoV-2

    Unknown

  • The Gene Ontology: Enhancements for 2011

    J. A. Blake;M. Dolan;H. Drabkin;D. P. Hill

  • Capturing variation impact on molecular interactions in the IMEx Consortium mutations data set

    N Del-Toro;M Duesbury;M Koch;M Koch

  • The fission yeast SPB component Cut12 links bipolar spindle formation to mitotic control

    Alan J. Bridge;Mary Morphew;Rachel Bartlett;Iain M. Hagan

Frequent Co-Authors

Ioannis Xenarios
Ioannis Xenarios University of Lausanne
Nicole Redaschi
Nicole Redaschi Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Lydie Bougueleret
Lydie Bougueleret Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Sandra Orchard
Sandra Orchard European Bioinformatics Institute
Patrick Masson
Patrick Masson Kazan Federal University
Elisabeth Gasteiger
Elisabeth Gasteiger Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Maria Jesus Martin
Maria Jesus Martin European Bioinformatics Institute
Rolf Apweiler
Rolf Apweiler European Bioinformatics Institute
Claire O'Donovan
Claire O'Donovan European Bioinformatics Institute
Paul D. Thomas
Paul D. Thomas University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a variety of online degrees and flexible career pathways in healthcare and life sciences. Many students interested in research and patient care consider transitioning to advanced nursing programs as a way to expand their expertise.

For those with an associate degree in nursing, asn to fnp programs offer a direct path to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. These bridge programs provide a streamlined approach to earning a master's degree and advancing in clinical roles.

Individuals with diverse academic backgrounds can explore direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online, which empower non-nursing graduates to rapidly earn a Master of Science in Nursing.

As online education options expand, it’s important to compare institutions. Learn more about leading universities in the field with wgu vs chamberlain, giving you insights on program flexibility, accreditation, and student outcomes.

Finally, if you’re looking for an efficient and cost-effective route, review the best rn to bsn to msn online programs to support your transition into leadership and specialized clinical roles.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Bridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles