World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 57 4396 4034 374 351 314 9841

Adam Strzelczyk publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam Strzelczyk between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam Strzelczyk published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 20.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 55 publications in 2021. 78 of the 418 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 55. Peak 55 publications in 2021. 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 40 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 55 publications 2022: 45 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 41 publications
2006 2025

418 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam Strzelczyk: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 1
2007 0
2008 6
2009 4
2010 9
2011 6
2012 8
2013 11
2014 5
2015 9
2016 17
2017 27
2018 33
2019 40
2020 34
2021 55
2022 45
2023 30
2024 37
2025 41
Total 418
Download as CSV

Adam Strzelczyk publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Strzelczyk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 308–317 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 314 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128 314
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam Strzelczyk D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam Strzelczyk sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357 57
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam Strzelczyk is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a substantial body of work spanning subfields such as psychiatry and mental health, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, and genetics.

The main areas of scholarly contribution include epilepsy research and treatment, pharmacological effects and toxicity studies, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, neonatal and fetal brain pathology, tuberous sclerosis complex research, metabolism and genetic disorders, and traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Adam Strzelczyk include Felix Rosenow, Susanne Schubert-Bast, Laurent M. Willems, Susanne Knake, and Johann Philipp Zöllner.

Publications by Strzelczyk have appeared regularly in a select group of journals and venues, reflecting specialized interest in epilepsy and neurological conditions. The most common venues of publication are:

  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • Epilepsia
  • Clinical Epileptology
  • Neurological Research and Practice
  • Zeitschrift für Epileptologie

Among recent papers associated with Strzelczyk are:

  • Psychobehavioural and Cognitive Adverse Events of Anti-Seizure Medications for the Treatment of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies, 2022, CNS Drugs
  • International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020), 2021, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (authored by Adam D. Farmer but included in the dataset)
  • A systematic review on the burden of illness in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), 2020, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (authored by Johann Philipp Zöllner)
  • Reduced Rate of Inpatient Hospital Admissions in 18 German University Hospitals During the COVID-19 Lockdown, 2021, Frontiers in Public Health (authored by Lorenz A. Kapsner)
  • Comparison of minimally invasive and traditional surgical approaches for refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes, 2021, Epilepsia (authored by Konstantin Kohlhase)

Best Publications

  • Cost of epilepsy: a systematic review.

    Adam Strzelczyk;Jens Peter Reese;Richard Dodel;Hajo M Hamer

  • Costs, length of stay, and mortality of super‐refractory status epilepticus: A population‐based study from Germany

    Adam Strzelczyk;Adam Strzelczyk;Sonja Ansorge;Jana Hapfelmeier;Vijayveer Bonthapally

  • Psychobehavioural and Cognitive Adverse Events of Anti-Seizure Medications for the Treatment of Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathies

    Unknown

  • Postictal generalized electroencephalographic suppression is associated with generalized seizures

    Rainer Surges;Adam Strzelczyk;Adam Strzelczyk;Catherine A. Scott;Matthew C. Walker

  • Lacosamide in status epilepticus: Systematic review of current evidence

    Adam Strzelczyk;Adam Strzelczyk;Johann Philipp Zöllner;Laurent M. Willems;Julie Jost

  • Costs of epilepsy and cost‐driving factors in children, adolescents, and their caregivers in Germany

    Janna Riechmann;Adam Strzelczyk;Adam Strzelczyk;Jens P Reese;Rainer Boor

  • Progressive Postnatal Motoneuron Loss in Mice Lacking GDF-15

    Jens Strelau;Adam Strzelczyk;Patricia Rusu;Gerald Bendner

  • Factors predicting cessation of status epilepticus in clinical practice: Data from a prospective observational registry (SENSE).

    Christoph Kellinghaus;Andrea O. Rossetti;Eugen Trinka;Nicolas Lang

  • The Burden of Severely Drug-Refractory Epilepsy: A Comparative Longitudinal Evaluation of Mortality, Morbidity, Resource Use, and Cost Using German Health Insurance Data.

    Adam Strzelczyk;Claudia Griebel;Wolfram Lux;Felix Rosenow;Felix Rosenow

  • Benzodiazepines in the Management of Seizures and Status Epilepticus: A Review of Routes of Delivery, Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Tolerability

    Unknown

  • Prevalence, utilization, and costs of antiepileptic drugs for epilepsy in Germany—a nationwide population-based study in children and adults

    Hajo M. Hamer;Richard Dodel;Adam Strzelczyk;Monika Balzer-Geldsetzer

  • Revised version of quality guidelines for presurgical epilepsy evaluation and surgical epilepsy therapy issued by the Austrian, German, and Swiss working group on presurgical epilepsy diagnosis and operative epilepsy treatment

    Felix Rosenow;Felix Rosenow;Thomas Bast;Thomas Czech;Martha Feucht

  • Direct and indirect costs of refractory epilepsy in a tertiary epilepsy center in Germany.

    Hajo M. Hamer;Annika Spottke;Christiane Aletsee;Susanne Knake

  • A Practical Guide to the Treatment of Dravet Syndrome with Anti-Seizure Medication

    Unknown

  • The history of invasive EEG evaluation in epilepsy patients.

    Philipp S. Reif;Adam Strzelczyk;Felix Rosenow;Felix Rosenow

  • Postmarketing experience with brivaracetam in the treatment of epilepsies: A multicenter cohort study from Germany.

    Isabel Steinig;Felix von Podewils;Gabriel Möddel;Sebastian Bauer;Sebastian Bauer

  • Reduced Rate of Inpatient Hospital Admissions in 18 German University Hospitals During the COVID-19 Lockdown.

    Lorenz Alois Kapsner;Marvin O. Kampf;Susanne A. Seuchter;Julian Gruendner

  • A systematic review on the burden of illness in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)

    Johann Philipp Zöllner;David Neal Franz;Christoph Hertzberg;Rima Nabbout

  • Comparison of minimally invasive and traditional surgical approaches for refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of outcomes

    Konstantin Kohlhase;Johann Philipp Zöllner;Nitin Tandon;Adam Strzelczyk

  • Management and long-term outcome in patients presenting with ictal asystole or bradycardia.

    Adam Strzelczyk;Margarethe Cenusa;Sebastian Bauer;Hajo M. Hamer

  • KCNC3: phenotype, mutations, channel biophysics-a study of 260 familial ataxia patients.

    Karla P. Figueroa;Natali A. Minassian;Giovanni Stevanin;Giovanni Stevanin;Michael Waters

  • Inpatient treatment costs of status epilepticus in adults in Germany.

    Adam Strzelczyk;Susanne Knake;Wolfgang H. Oertel;Felix Rosenow

  • Evaluation of health-care utilization among adult patients with epilepsy in Germany.

    Adam Strzelczyk;Tanja Nickolay;Sebastian Bauer;Anja Haag

  • Prospective evaluation of a post-stroke epilepsy risk scale

    Adam Strzelczyk;Anja Haag;Hans Raupach;Gregor Herrendorf

Frequent Co-Authors

Felix Rosenow
Felix Rosenow Goethe University Frankfurt
Susanne Knake
Susanne Knake Philipp University of Marburg
Susanne Schubert-Bast
Susanne Schubert-Bast Goethe University Frankfurt
Karl Martin Klein
Karl Martin Klein University of Calgary
Hajo M. Hamer
Hajo M. Hamer University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Wolfgang H. Oertel
Wolfgang H. Oertel Philipp University of Marburg
Thomas Bast
Thomas Bast Kork Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork
Eugen Trinka
Eugen Trinka Paracelsus Medical University
Richard Dodel
Richard Dodel University of Duisburg-Essen
Gerhard Kluger
Gerhard Kluger Paracelsus Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Adam Strzelczyk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles