World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11136 10463 605 581 481 39743

Richard Dodel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard Dodel between 1995 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard Dodel published across 32 years, from 1995 to 2026, averaging 16.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2011. 10 of the 525 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2011. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 33 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 33 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 42 publications 2011: 51 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 8 publications 2026: 2 publications
1995 2026

525 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard Dodel: publications per year, 1995 to 2026
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 4
1998 6
1999 3
2000 3
2001 9
2002 10
2003 14
2004 33
2005 11
2006 14
2007 19
2008 33
2009 32
2010 42
2011 51
2012 26
2013 30
2014 14
2015 17
2016 18
2017 21
2018 15
2019 17
2020 14
2021 12
2022 12
2023 13
2024 20
2025 8
2026 2
Total 525
Download as CSV

Richard Dodel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Dodel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 481 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 481
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard Dodel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Dodel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839 92
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard Dodel is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a specific focus on neurology. Their research portfolio includes 135 publications primarily within medicine, of which 53 are in neurology, followed by significant work in psychiatry and mental health, physiology, general health professions, and economics and econometrics.

The scientist's main research themes encompass Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, dementia and cognitive impairment research, neurological disorders and treatments, and health systems including economic evaluations and quality of life assessments. Alzheimer's disease research and treatments also represent a notable part of their work, alongside studies involving Ginkgo biloba and cashew applications and broader health and medical studies.

Frequent publication venues for Richard Dodel's work include Alzheimer s & Dementia, Der Nervenarzt, DGNeurologie, InFo Neurologie + Psychiatrie, and Neurological Research and Practice.

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard Dodel include:

  • Trial of Deferiprone in Parkinson's Disease, 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • The late stage of Parkinson's - results of a large multinational study on motor and non-motor complications, 2020, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • The Prevalence and Determinants of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms in Late-Stage Parkinsonism, 2020, Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
  • Bupropion for the Treatment of Apathy in Alzheimer Disease, 2020, JAMA Network Open
  • Alpha-synuclein Immunization Strategies for Synucleinopathies in Clinical Studies: A Biological Perspective, 2022, Neurotherapeutics

Richard Dodel frequently collaborates with several prominent researchers, including Stefan Lorenzl, Per Odin, Daniela Berg, Wassilios G. Meissner, and Alexander Storch, with each co-authoring multiple publications alongside them.

Best Publications

  • Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Barbara C. Tilley;Stephanie R. Shaftman;Glenn T. Stebbins

  • Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria

    Günter U Höglinger;Gesine Respondek;Maria Stamelou;Carolin Kurz

  • Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010

    Anders Gustavsson;Mikael Svensson;Frank Jacobi;Christer Allgulander

  • Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan.

    Christopher G. Goetz;Stanley Fahn;Pablo Martinez-Martin;Werner Poewe

  • Lack of apolipoprotein E dramatically reduces amyloid beta-peptide deposition.

    Kelly R. Bales;Tatyana Verina;Richard C. Dodel;Richard C. Dodel;Yansheng Du

  • Minocycline prevents nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurodegeneration in the MPTP model of Parkinson's disease.

    Yansheng Du;Zhizhong Ma;Suizhen Lin;Richard C. Dodel

  • Prevalence and incidence of Parkinson's disease in Europe.

    Sonja von Campenhausen;Bernhard Bornschein;Regina Wick;Kai Bötzel

  • Apolipoprotein E is essential for amyloid deposition in the APP(V717F) transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Kelly R. Bales;Tatyana Verina;David J. Cummins;Yansheng Du

  • The natural history of multiple system atrophy: a prospective European cohort study

    Gregor K Wenning;Felix Geser;Felix Geser;Florian Krismer;Klaus Seppi

  • Intravenous immunoglobulins containing antibodies against β-amyloid for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

    R C Dodel;Y Du;C Depboylu;H Hampel

  • Long-Term Outcome After Stroke Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life Using Utility Measurements

    Caroline Haacke;Astrid Althaus;Annika Spottke;Uwe Siebert

  • Value of CSF beta-amyloid1-42 and tau as predictors of Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    H. Hampel;S. J. Teipel;T. Fuchsberger;N. Andreasen

  • Cognitive impairment in 873 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease : Results from the German Study on Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease with Dementia (GEPAD)

    Oliver Riedel;Jens Klotsche;Annika Spottke;Giinther Deuschl

  • Reduced levels of amyloid β-peptide antibody in Alzheimer disease

    Y. Du;R. Dodel;H. Hampel;K. Buerger

  • The future of Alzheimer's disease: the next 10 years.

    Harald Hampel;David Prvulovic;Stefan Teipel;Frank Jessen

  • Cost of epilepsy: a systematic review.

    Adam Strzelczyk;Jens Peter Reese;Richard Dodel;Hajo M Hamer

  • Activation mapping in essential tremor with functional magnetic resonance imaging.

    Stefan F. Bucher;Klaus C. Seelos;Richard C. Dodel;Maximilian Reiser

  • Frequency of dementia, depression, and other neuropsychiatric symptoms in 1,449 outpatients with Parkinson’s disease

    Oliver Riedel;Jens Klotsche;Annika Spottke;Giinther Deuschl

  • Screening for cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease with the Parkinson neuropsychometric dementia assessment (PANDA) instrument

    Elke Kalbe;Pasquale Calabrese;Nils Kohn;Rüdiger Hilker

  • Association of an interleukin 1α polymorphism with Alzheimer’s disease

    Yansheng Du;R. C. Dodel;B. J. Eastwood;K. R. Bales

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang H. Oertel
Wolfgang H. Oertel Philipp University of Marburg
Uwe Siebert
Uwe Siebert UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology
Daniela Berg
Daniela Berg University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Martin R. Farlow
Martin R. Farlow Indiana University
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Brit Mollenhauer
Brit Mollenhauer University of Göttingen
Günther Deuschl
Günther Deuschl Kiel University
Claudia Trenkwalder
Claudia Trenkwalder University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring a future in Medicine, there are several related online degrees and specialized career pathways to consider. Many online programs offer flexibility, affordability, and the ability to balance studies with other commitments—making them ideal for aspiring healthcare professionals.

For those interested in healthcare data and administration, there are accredited online rhit degree programs that cover health information management essentials. Alternatively, if coding and billing systems are more your style, consider enrolling in medical billing and coding online courses to prepare for vital support roles in the healthcare industry.

Nursing is another rewarding path, with a range of accessible online offerings. Aspiring nurse practitioners can explore high-quality, cheap np programs that allow you to advance your scope of practice. For those beginning their nursing education, cheapest online bsn programs provide an affordable route to earning a Bachelor of Science in Nursing and starting your clinical career.

These online pathways can offer not only financial savings but also greater accessibility, so you can build a healthcare career to suit your interests and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Dodel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles