World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
54
Citations
15886
World Ranking
2632
National Ranking
21

Berit Arheimer publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Berit Arheimer sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 193 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Berit Arheimer D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Berit Arheimer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Berit Arheimer is affiliated with the Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute in Sweden. Their work primarily focuses on environmental science with significant contributions to the subfields of global and planetary change, water science and technology, atmospheric science, environmental engineering, and information systems.

Their research addresses multiple topics including hydrology and watershed management studies, flood risk assessment and management, cryospheric studies and observations, plant water relations and carbon dynamics, hydrology and drought analysis, climate variability and models, and research data management practices.

Among their frequent co-authors are Jafet Andersson, Rafael Pimentel, Louise Crochemore, René Capell, and Ilias Pechlivanidis.

The venues where Berit Arheimer has commonly published include:

  • Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Scientific Data
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Water Resources Research

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Berit Arheimer are:

  • Global catchment modelling using World-Wide HYPE (WWH), open data, and stepwise parameter estimation, 2020, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Which Potential Evapotranspiration Formula to Use in Hydrological Modeling World-Wide?, 2023, Water Resources Research
  • Editorial - Towards FAIR and SQUARE hydrological data, 2020, Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Quantifying multi-year hydrological memory with Catchment Forgetting Curves, 2022, Hydrology and earth system sciences
  • Megafloods in Europe can be anticipated from observations in hydrologically similar catchments, 2023, Nature Geoscience

Best Publications

  • A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review

    M. Hrachowitz;H. H. G. Savenije;G. Blöschl;J. J. Mcdonnell

  • Changing climate both increases and decreases European river floods

    Günter Blöschl;Julia Hall;Alberto Viglione;Alberto Viglione;Rui A P Perdigão

  • Changing climate shifts timing of European floods

    Günter Blöschl;Julia Hall;Juraj Parajka;Rui A. P. Perdigão

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • Regional and global concerns over wetlands and water quality

    Jos T.A. Verhoeven;Berit Arheimer;Chengqing Yin;Mariet M. Hefting

  • “Panta Rhei—Everything Flows”: Change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022

    A. Montanari;G. Young;H.H.G. Savenije;D.A. Hughes

  • Development and testing of the HYPE (Hydrological Predictions for the Environment) water quality model for different spatial scales

    Göran Lindström;Charlotta Pers;Jörgen Rosberg;Johan Strömqvist

  • Understanding Flood Regime Changes in Europe: A state of the art assessment

    J Hall;B Arheimer;M Borga;R Brazdil;R Brazdil

  • Potential applications of subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) predictions

    Christopher J. White;Christopher J. White;Henrik Carlsen;Andrew W. Robertson;Richard J.T. Klein

  • Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations from agricultural catchments—influence of spatial and temporal variables

    Berit Arheimer;R. Lidén

  • Using flow signatures and catchment similarities to evaluate the E-HYPE multi-basin model across Europe.

    Chantal Donnelly;Jafet C.M. Andersson;Berit Arheimer

  • How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change

    Valentina Krysanova;Chantal Donnelly;Alexander Gelfan;Dieter Gerten

  • Modelling nitrogen transport and retention in the catchments of southern Sweden

    Berit Arheimer;Maja Brandt

  • Modelling nitrogen removal in potential wetlands at the catchment scale

    Berit Arheimer;Hans B Wittgren

  • Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?

    Christopher Hutton;Thorsten Wagener;Jim Freer;Dawei Han

  • Variation of nitrogen concentration in forest streams — influences of flow, seasonality and catchment characteristics

    B. Arheimer;L. Andersson;A. Lepistö

  • Water and nutrient predictions in ungauged basins: set-up and evaluation of a model at the national scale

    Johan Strömqvist;Berit Arheimer;Joel Dahné;Chantal Donnelly

  • Understanding hydrologic variability across Europe through catchment classification

    Anna Kuentz;Berit Arheimer;Yeshewatesfa Hundecha;Thorsten Wagener

  • Climate Change Impact on Water Quality: Model Results from Southern Sweden

    Berit Arheimer;Johan Andréasson;Sofia Fogelberg;Holger Johnsson

  • Accelerating advances in continental domain hydrologic modeling

    Stacey A. Archfield;Martyn Clark;Berit Arheimer;Lauren E. Hay

  • Comparing reconstructed past variations and future projections of the Baltic Sea ecosystem—first results from multi-model ensemble simulations

    H E Markus Meier;Helén C Andersson;Berit Arheimer;Thorsten Blenckner

Frequent Co-Authors

Thorsten Wagener
Thorsten Wagener University of Potsdam
Alberto Montanari
Alberto Montanari University of Bologna
Jim Freer
Jim Freer University of Bristol
Dawei Han
Dawei Han University of Bristol
Markus Hrachowitz
Markus Hrachowitz Delft University of Technology
Hubert H. G. Savenije
Hubert H. G. Savenije Delft University of Technology
Attilio Castellarin
Attilio Castellarin University of Bologna
Alberto Viglione
Alberto Viglione Polytechnic University of Turin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens a variety of career paths, many of which can be complemented by additional online degrees. For example, those interested in blending creativity with environmental studies might explore an online MFA degree, which can enhance skills in communication and visualization of complex data.

Managing projects and teams is crucial in Earth Science roles, making programs like an online masters in human resource management valuable for professionals looking to advance into leadership positions.

Online education is increasingly accessible to all age groups. Seniors interested in continuing their education might find specific online degrees for seniors that cater to flexible schedules and lifelong learning goals, allowing them to stay engaged with Earth Science topics.

For those aiming to work in research or academic libraries related to Earth Science, considering ALA MLIS programs can provide specialized knowledge in managing scientific information resources effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Berit Arheimer

Trending Scientists