World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
54
Citations
8939
World Ranking
2748
National Ranking
178

Valentina Krysanova publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valentina Krysanova sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 136 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Valentina Krysanova D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Valentina Krysanova sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Valentina Krysanova is affiliated with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. Their research centers primarily on environmental science with a marked focus on global and planetary change, water science and technology, and atmospheric science.

Their work spans several closely related subfields including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Environmental Engineering

Key topics covered by their research include:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Cryospheric Studies and Observations
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Transboundary Water Resource Management

Recent publications by Krysanova demonstrate engagement with hydrological modeling and the impacts of climate change on water systems. Notable papers include:

  • How evaluation of global hydrological models can help to improve credibility of river discharge projections under climate change, 2020, Climatic Change
  • Central Asian rivers under climate change: Impacts assessment in eight representative catchments, 2021, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
  • Towards a more consistent eco-hydrological modelling through multi-objective calibration: a case study in the Andean Vilcanota River basin, Peru, 2020, Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Performance evaluation of global hydrological models in six large Pan-Arctic watersheds, 2020, Climatic Change
  • Climate change impact on water availability of main river basins in Ukraine, 2020, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies

Frequent publication venues reflect a focused contribution to climate and hydrology research, including:

  • Climatic Change
  • Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
  • Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology
  • Scientific Data

Collaborators appearing regularly in their publications include:

  • Fred F. Hattermann
  • Anastasia Lobanova
  • Iulii Didovets
  • Christoph Menz
  • Carlos Antonio Fernández-Palomino

Best Publications

  • Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

    Katja Frieler;Stefan Lange;Franziska Piontek;Christopher P. O. Reyer

  • Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds

    Unknown

  • Spatial Variation and Trends in PDSI and SPI Indices and Their Relation to Streamflow in 10 Large Regions of China

    Jianqing Zhai;Buda Su;Valentina Krysanova;Tobias Vetter

  • Uncertainty in climate change impacts on water resources

    Z.W. Kundzewicz;Z.W. Kundzewicz;V. Krysanova;R.E. Benestad;Ø. Hov

  • On Critiques of “Stationarity is Dead: Whither Water Management?”

    Paul C.D. Milly;Julio L. Betancourt;Malin Falkenmark;Robert M. Hirsch

  • Advances in water resources assessment with SWAT—an overview

    Valentina Krysanova;Mike White

  • Evaluation of sources of uncertainty in projected hydrological changes under climate change in 12 large-scale river basins

    Tobias Vetter;Julia Reinhardt;Martina Flörke;Ann van Griensven;Ann van Griensven

  • How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change

    Valentina Krysanova;Chantal Donnelly;Alexander Gelfan;Dieter Gerten

  • Advances in ecohydrological modelling with SWAT—a review

    Valentina Krysanova;Jeffrey G. Arnold

  • Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making

    Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz;V. Krysanova;R. Dankers;Y. Hirabayashi

  • Comparing impacts of climate change on streamflow in four large African river basins

    V. Aich;S. Liersch;T. Vetter;S. Huang

  • Cross‐scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large river basins

    Fred Hattermann;V. Krysanova;Simon N. Gosling;Rutger Dankers

  • Development of the ecohydrological model SWIM for regional impact studies and vulnerability assessment

    Valentina Krysanova;Fred Hattermann;Frank Wechsung

  • Sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate impact assessment: a cross-scale study

    Fred Hattermann;Tobias Vetter;Tobias Vetter;Lutz Breuer;Buda Su

  • Impact of climate change on soil moisture dynamics in Brandenburg with a focus on nature conservation areas

    Anne Holsten;Tobias Vetter;Katrin Vohland;Valentina Krysanova

  • Integrating wetlands and riparian zones in river basin modelling

    F.F. Hattermann;V. Krysanova;A. Habeck;A. Bronstert;A. Bronstert

  • Multi-model climate impact assessment and intercomparison for three large-scale river basins on three continents

    T. Vetter;S. Huang;V. Aich;T. Yang

  • New challenges in integrated water quality modelling

    Michael Rode;George Arhonditsis;Daniela Balin;Tesfaye Kebede

  • Modelling river discharge for large drainage basins: from lumped to distributed approach

    V. Krysanova;A. Bronstert;D.-I. Müller-Wohlfeil

  • Intercomparison of regional-scale hydrological models and climate change impacts projected for 12 large river basins worldwide—a synthesis

    Valentina Krysanova;Tobias Vetter;Stephanie Eisner;Shaochun Huang;Shaochun Huang

  • Cross-Comparison of Climate Change adaptation Strategies Across Large River Basins in Europe, Africa and Asia

    Valentina Krysanova;Chris Dickens;Jos Timmerman;Consuelo Varela-Ortega

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred Hattermann
Fred Hattermann Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Shaochun Huang
Shaochun Huang Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Tao Yang
Tao Yang Hohai University
Buda Su
Buda Su Chinese Academy of Sciences
Axel Bronstert
Axel Bronstert University of Potsdam
Dieter Gerten
Dieter Gerten Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Simon N. Gosling
Simon N. Gosling University of Nottingham
Martina Flörke
Martina Flörke Ruhr University Bochum
Hannes Müller Schmied
Hannes Müller Schmied Goethe University Frankfurt

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of interdisciplinary career paths and further educational opportunities. Many students and professionals complement their Earth Science knowledge with skills from other fields to boost their employability and adaptability in a changing job market.

For instance, veterans seeking to combine language skills with scientific expertise might explore veteran friendly online spanish degree programs. This can be especially useful in multinational environmental projects or community outreach roles.

Creatives interested in environmental communication or ecological design may benefit from affordable advanced arts education through resources on online mfa offerings.

Additionally, acquiring management acumen is crucial. Those aiming for team leadership or HR roles within scientific organizations might find value in pursuing an online masters degree in human resource management.

Finally, lifelong learners including seniors can access tailored education through online degree programs for seniors, enabling continued professional development or personal enrichment in Earth Science and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Valentina Krysanova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles