World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
4012
World Ranking
11834
National Ranking
401

Ilaria Catapano publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilaria Catapano sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 189 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ilaria Catapano D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilaria Catapano sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ilaria Catapano is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Engineering and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on subfields such as Ocean Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Geophysics, Aerospace Engineering, and Environmental Engineering.

Their work emphasizes topics including Geophysical Methods and Applications, Microwave Imaging and Scattering Analysis, Seismic Waves and Analysis, Advanced SAR Imaging Techniques, Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage, and Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Catapano include Francesco Soldovieri, Gianluca Gennarelli, Giovanni Ludeno, Giuseppe Esposito, and Carlo Noviello.

Key publication venues where Catapano has contributed multiple articles are:

  • Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
  • Sensors
  • Remote Sensing of Environment

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Ilaria Catapano include:

  • A smart multiple spatial and temporal resolution system to support precision agriculture from satellite images: Proof of concept on Aglianico vineyard (2020) in Remote Sensing of Environment
  • UAV photogrammetry, infrared thermography and GPR for enhancing structural and material degradation evaluation of the Roman masonry bridge of Ponte Lucano in Italy (2020) in NDT & E International
  • Contactless Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging: State of the art, challenges, and microwave tomography-based data processing (2021) in IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
  • An Overview on Down-Looking UAV-Based GPR Systems (2022) in Remote Sensing
  • A Comparison of Linear Inverse Scattering Models for Contactless GPR Imaging (2020) in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Best Publications

  • A FEASIBILITY STUDY ON MICROWAVE IMAGING FOR BRAIN STROKE MONITORING

    Rosa Scapaticci;Loreto Di Donato;Ilaria Catapano;Lorenzo Crocco

  • On Simple Methods for Shape Reconstruction of Unknown Scatterers

    I. Catapano;L. Crocco;T. Isernia

  • Microwave Cancer Imaging Exploiting Magnetic Nanoparticles as Contrast Agent

    G. Bellizzi;O. M. Bucci;I. Catapano

  • Improved Sampling Methods for Shape Reconstruction of 3-D Buried Targets

    I. Catapano;L. Crocco;T. Isernia

  • SAR Imaging Algorithms and Some Unconventional Applications: A unified mathematical overview

    Raffaele Solimene;Ilaria Catapano;Gianluca Gennarelli;Antonio Cuccaro

  • Ground Clutter Removal in GPR Surveys

    Raffaele Solimene;A. Cuccaro;A. Dell'Aversano;Ilaria Catapano

  • On quantitative microwave tomography of female breast

    Ilaria Catapano;Loreto Di Donato;Lorenzo Crocco;Ovidio Mario Bucci

  • The Linear Sampling Method as a Way to Quantitative Inverse Scattering

    L. Crocco;I. Catapano;L. Di Donato;T. Isernia

  • LCIS DSS—An irrigation supporting system for water use efficiency improvement in precision agriculture: A maize case study

    A. Bonfante;E. Monaco;P. Manna;R. De Mascellis

  • Differential Microwave Imaging for Brain Stroke Followup

    R. Scapaticci;O. M. Bucci;I. Catapano;L. Crocco

  • Dielectric characterization study of liquid-based materials for mimicking breast tissues

    Stefania Romeo;Loreto Di Donato;Ovidio Mario Bucci;Ilaria Catapano

  • A smart multiple spatial and temporal resolution system to support precision agriculture from satellite images: Proof of concept on Aglianico vineyard

    A. Brook;V. De Micco;G. Battipaglia;A. Erbaggio

  • UAV photogrammetry, infrared thermography and GPR for enhancing structural and material degradation evaluation of the Roman masonry bridge of Ponte Lucano in Italy

    C. Biscarini;I. Catapano;N. Cavalagli;G. Ludeno

  • Contactless Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging: State of the Art, Challenges, and Microwave Tomography-Based Data Processing

    Ilaria Catapano;Gianluca Gennarelli;Giovanni Ludeno;Carlo Noviello

  • Optimal Constrained Field Focusing for Hyperthermia Cancer Therapy: a Feasibility Assessment on Realistic Phantoms

    Domenica A. M. Iero;Tommaso Isernia;Andrea Francesco Morabito;Ilaria Catapano

  • An Effective Procedure for MNP-Enhanced Breast Cancer Microwave Imaging

    Rosa Scapaticci;Gennaro Bellizzi;Ilaria Catapano;Lorenzo Crocco

  • An Imaging Method for Concealed Targets

    I. Catapano;L. Crocco

  • 3D microwave imaging via preliminary support reconstruction : testing on the Fresnel 2008 database

    Ilaria Catapano;Lorenzo Crocco;Michele D' Urso;Tommaso Isernia

  • Wavelet-Based Adaptive Multiresolution Inversion for Quantitative Microwave Imaging of Breast Tissues

    R. Scapaticci;I. Catapano;L. Crocco

  • On the Effect of Support Estimation and of a New Model in 2-D Inverse Scattering Problems

    I. Catapano;L. Crocco;M. D'Urso;T. Isernia

  • Assessment of a micro-UAV system for microwave tomography radar imaging

    Giovanni Ludeno;Ilaria Catapano;Alfredo Renga;Amedeo Rodi Vetrella

  • A Comparative Study of GPR Reconstruction Approaches for Landmine Detection

    Maria A. Gonzalez-Huici;Ilaria Catapano;Francesco Soldovieri

Frequent Co-Authors

Francesco Soldovieri
Francesco Soldovieri National Research Council (CNR)
Lorenzo Crocco
Lorenzo Crocco National Research Council (CNR)
Tommaso Isernia
Tommaso Isernia University of Reggio Calabria
Ovidio Mario Bucci
Ovidio Mario Bucci National Research Council (CNR)
Alessandro Galli
Alessandro Galli Sapienza University of Rome
Enzo Rizzo
Enzo Rizzo University of Ferrara
Nicola Masini
Nicola Masini National Research Council (CNR)
Riccardo Lanari
Riccardo Lanari National Research Council (CNR)
Filippo Ubertini
Filippo Ubertini University of Perugia
Lorenzo Bruzzone
Lorenzo Bruzzone University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options for online study in the USA opens doors to a range of flexible and accessible degree programs. If cost is a primary concern, discovering the cheapest online degrees can help you earn a recognized qualification without overwhelming student debt.

Many aspiring computer science professionals may be concerned about their academic background. Fortunately, a number of online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa offer new opportunities to further your education, even if you have a lower GPA.

For those in a hurry to accelerate their career, enrolling in one of the best online computer science degree programs enables you to complete your studies faster and enter the technology workforce sooner.

Interested in alternative fields? An environmental science major also offers diverse opportunities—learn more about what can you do with an environmental science major, from policy roles to tech-driven sustainability careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ilaria Catapano

Trending Scientists