World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Francesco Soldovieri

Francesco Soldovieri

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
50
Citations
9975
World Ranking
4068
National Ranking
112

Francesco Soldovieri publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Soldovieri sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 514 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Francesco Soldovieri D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Soldovieri sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Francesco Soldovieri is affiliated with the National Research Council (CNR) in Italy. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a primary focus in engineering and earth and planetary sciences. The subfields where they have contributed significantly include ocean engineering, biomedical engineering, astronomy and astrophysics, aerospace engineering, and geophysics.

Their scientific work concentrates on several main topics including geophysical methods and applications, microwave imaging and scattering analysis, planetary science and exploration, seismic waves and analysis, advanced SAR imaging techniques, astro and planetary science, as well as ultrasonics and acoustic wave propagation.

Their publication record features articles in numerous established journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
  • Nature Astronomy
  • Sensors

Notable recent papers include:

  • The Moon's farside shallow subsurface structure unveiled by Chang'E-4 Lunar Penetrating Radar, 2020, Science Advances
  • Contactless Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging: State of the art, challenges, and microwave tomography-based data processing, 2021, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
  • An Overview on Down-Looking UAV-Based GPR Systems, 2022, Remote Sensing
  • A Comparison of Linear Inverse Scattering Models for Contactless GPR Imaging, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Radio Frequency Tomography for Nondestructive Testing of Pillars, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Collaborations form a significant part of their research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Gianluca Gennarelli
  • Ilaria Catapano
  • Giovanni Ludeno
  • Giuseppe Esposito
  • Carlo Noviello

In addition to journal articles, they have contributed to book publications. One such publication is with Springer Nature titled Instrumentation and Measurement Technologies for Water Cycle Management, released in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Radar evidence of subglacial liquid water on Mars

    R. Orosei;S. E. Lauro;E. Pettinelli;A. Cicchetti

  • Three-dimensional focusing with multipass SAR data

    G. Fornaro;F. Serafino;F. Soldovieri

  • A Microwave Resonant Sensor for Concentration Measurements of Liquid Solutions

    G. Gennarelli;S. Romeo;M. R. Scarfi;F. Soldovieri

  • Radio Frequency Tomography for Tunnel Detection

    L. Lo Monte;D. Erricolo;F. Soldovieri;M.C. Wicks

  • Through-Wall Imaging via a Linear Inverse Scattering Algorithm

    F. Soldovieri;R. Solimene

  • The Moon's farside shallow subsurface structure unveiled by Chang'E-4 Lunar Penetrating Radar.

    Chunlai Li;Yan Su;Elena Pettinelli;Shuguo Xing

  • Multiple subglacial water bodies below the south pole of Mars unveiled by new MARSIS data

    Sebastian Emanuel Lauro;Elena Pettinelli;Graziella Caprarelli;Luca Guallini

  • Analysis of the distorted Born approximation for subsurface reconstruction: truncation and uncertainties effects

    G. Leone;F. Soldovieri

  • A two probes scanning phaseless near-field far-field transformation technique

    R. Pierri;G. D'Elia;F. Soldovieri

  • A linear inverse scattering algorithm for realistic GPR applications

    Francesco Soldovieri;Johannes Hugenschmidt;Raffaele Persico;Giovanni Leone

  • Three-Dimensional Through-Wall Imaging Under Ambiguous Wall Parameters

    R. Solimene;F. Soldovieri;G. Prisco;R. Pierri

  • The role of the measurement configuration in inverse scattering from buried objects under the Born approximation

    R. Persico;R. Bernini;F. Soldovieri

  • SAR Imaging Algorithms and Some Unconventional Applications: A unified mathematical overview

    Raffaele Solimene;Ilaria Catapano;Gianluca Gennarelli;Antonio Cuccaro

  • Ground Clutter Removal in GPR Surveys

    Raffaele Solimene;A. Cuccaro;A. Dell'Aversano;Ilaria Catapano

  • On the information content of the radiated fields in the near zone over bounded domains

    Rocco Pierri;Francesco Soldovieri

  • GPR Response From Buried Pipes: Measurement on Field Site and Tomographic Reconstructions

    E. Pettinelli;A. Di Matteo;E. Mattei;L. Crocco

  • A Novel Strategy for the Surface Current Determination From Marine X-Band Radar Data

    Francesco Serafino;Claudio Lugni;Francesco Soldovieri

  • A Multiarray Tomographic Approach for Through-Wall Imaging

    R. Solimene;F. Soldovieri;G. Prisco

  • A Kirchhoff-Based Shape Reconstruction Algorithm for the Multimonostatic Configuration: The Realistic Case of Buried Pipes

    F. Soldovieri;A. Brancaccio;G. Prisco;G. Leone

  • Multipath Ghosts in Radar Imaging: Physical Insight and Mitigation Strategies

    Gianluca Gennarelli;Francesco Soldovieri

  • Sparse Reconstruction From GPR Data With Applications to Rebar Detection

    F Soldovieri;R Solimene;Lorenzo Lo Monte;M Bavusi

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilaria Catapano
Ilaria Catapano National Research Council (CNR)
Rocco Pierri
Rocco Pierri University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Lorenzo Crocco
Lorenzo Crocco National Research Council (CNR)
Nicola Masini
Nicola Masini National Research Council (CNR)
Vincenzo Lapenna
Vincenzo Lapenna National Research Council (CNR)
Alessandro Galli
Alessandro Galli Sapienza University of Rome
Roberto Orosei
Roberto Orosei National Institute for Astrophysics
Michael C. Wicks
Michael C. Wicks University of Dayton
Gianfranco Fornaro
Gianfranco Fornaro National Research Council (CNR)
Romeo Bernini
Romeo Bernini National Research Council (CNR)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring engineering and technology in the USA opens the door to a wide array of online degree options and career trajectories. Many students choose to supplement their technical expertise with valuable business and communication skills. For example, professionals looking to improve their communication strategy often pursue an online master's in communications, which builds leadership and team collaboration capabilities essential in engineering environments.

Entrepreneurs in tech-driven industries benefit from finding the best online mba in entrepreneurship to hone innovation and business acumen. For those who prefer a streamlined admissions process, an mba online no gmat program provides flexibility without standardized test requirements.

Additionally, strong project management is critical in both engineering and technology sectors. Earning a project management degree online accredited can propel your ability to lead complex projects successfully. Leveraging these related online degrees helps engineers and technologists stand out and adapt to the evolving demands of their field.

Best Scientists Citing Francesco Soldovieri

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles