World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 88 636 602 280 257 602 50083

Scot T. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scot T. Martin between 1994 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scot T. Martin published across 33 years, from 1994 to 2026, averaging 27.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 547 publications in 2020. 6 of the 897 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 547. Peak 547 publications in 2020. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 28 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 547 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1994 2026

897 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scot T. Martin: publications per year, 1994 to 2026
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 4
1996 2
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 4
2001 12
2002 3
2003 7
2004 9
2005 8
2006 10
2007 14
2008 13
2009 20
2010 18
2011 16
2012 10
2013 10
2014 8
2015 23
2016 28
2017 14
2018 29
2019 12
2020 547
2021 23
2022 16
2023 14
2024 9
2025 5
2026 1
Total 897
Download as CSV

Scot T. Martin publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot T. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 601–610 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 602 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7 602
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Scot T. Martin D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scot T. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29 88
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Scot T. Martin is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a particular emphasis on air quality and health impacts, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, and atmospheric aerosols and clouds. Their work spans subfields including health, toxicology and mutagenesis, atmospheric science, global and planetary change, spectroscopy, and automotive engineering.

Their recent publication record includes studies in several notable venues. These publications cover diverse topics such as diffusion coefficients, atmospheric aerosol particles, and urban air quality:

  • Unified Description of Diffusion Coefficients from Small to Large Molecules in Organic-Water Mixtures, 2020, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
  • Mixing states of Amazon basin aerosol particles transported over long distances using transmission electron microscopy, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Comparison of aircraft measurements during GoAmazon2014/5 and ACRIDICON-CHUVA, 2020, Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • WSOC and Its Relationship with BC, Levoglucosan and Transition Metals in the PM2.5 of an Urban Area in the Amazon, 2022, Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
  • Rapid growth of anthropogenic organic nanoparticles greatly alters cloud lifecycle in the Amazon rainforest, 2020, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

Martin frequently collaborates with other researchers. Common co-authors include:

  • Paulo Artaxo
  • Fan Mei
  • Jian Wang
  • J. M. Comstock
  • John E. Shilling

Their research is published primarily in the following venues:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry A
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques
  • Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society

The main topics explored in their publications include:

  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Diffusion Coefficients in Liquids
  • Adsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
  • Vehicle emissions and performance

Their scientific contributions span environmental processes related to the atmosphere, aerosol behavior, and pollutant dynamics, providing data relevant to both health and the broader planetary environment.

Best Publications

  • Environmental Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalysis

    Michael R. Hoffmann;Scot T. Martin;Wonyong. Choi;Detlef W. Bahnemann

  • Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing

    Manish Shrivastava;Christopher D. Cappa;Jiwen Fan;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Phase Transitions of Aqueous Atmospheric Particles.

    Scot T. Martin

  • Rainforest Aerosols as Biogenic Nuclei of Clouds and Precipitation in the Amazon

    U. Pöschl;S. T. Martin;B. Sinha;Q. Chen

  • Amorphous and crystalline aerosol particles interacting with water vapor: conceptual framework and experimental evidence for restructuring, phase transitions and kinetic limitations

    E. Mikhailov;E. Mikhailov;S. Vlasenko;S. T. Martin;T. Koop

  • A simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in the atmosphere

    C. L. Heald;J. H. Kroll;J. L. Jimenez;K. S. Docherty

  • Substantial convection and precipitation enhancements by ultrafine aerosol particles

    Jiwen Fan;Daniel Rosenfeld;Yuwei Zhang;Yuwei Zhang;Scott E. Giangrande

  • Viscosity of α-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle growth and reactivity

    Lindsay Renbaum-Wolff;James W. Grayson;Adam P. Bateman;Mikinori Kuwata

  • Photochemical Mechanism of Size-Quantized Vanadium-Doped TiO2 Particles

    Scot T. Martin;Colin L. Morrison;Michael R. Hoffmann

  • The viscosity of atmospherically relevant organic particles

    Jonathan P. Reid;Allan K. Bertram;David O. Topping;Alexander Laskin

  • Predicting the relative humidities of liquid-liquid phase separation, efflorescence, and deliquescence of mixed particles of ammonium sulfate, organic material, and water using the organic-to-sulfate mass ratio of the particle and the oxygen-to-carbon elemental ratio of the organic component

    A. K. Bertram;S. T. Martin;S. J. Hanna;M. L. Smith

  • Cloud condensation nuclei in pristine tropical rainforest air of Amazonia: size-resolved measurements and modeling of atmospheric aerosol composition and CCN activity

    S. S. Gunthe;S. M. King;D. Rose;Q. Chen

  • Sources and properties of Amazonian aerosol particles

    Scot T. Martin;Meinrat O. Andreae;Paulo Artaxo;Darrel Baumgardner

  • Introduction: Observations and Modeling of the Green Ocean Amazon (GoAmazon2014/5)

    S. T. Martin;P. Artaxo;L. A. T. Machado;A. O. Manzi

  • Fast sulfate formation from oxidation of SO 2 by NO 2 and HONO observed in Beijing haze

    Junfeng Wang;Junfeng Wang;Jingyi Li;Jianhuai Ye;Jian Zhao

  • Examining the effects of anthropogenic emissions on isoprene-derived secondary organic aerosol formation during the 2013 Southern Oxidant and Aerosol Study (SOAS) at the Look Rock, Tennessee ground site

    S. H. Budisulistiorini;S. H. Budisulistiorini;X. Li;S. T. Bairai;S. T. Bairai;J. Renfro

  • Using elemental ratios to predict the density of organic material composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen.

    Mikinori Kuwata;Soeren S R Zorn;Scot T Martin

  • Loading-dependent elemental composition of α-pinene SOA particles

    John E. Shilling;John E. Shilling;Qi Chen;Stephanie M. King;Thomas Rosenoern

  • Relative roles of biogenic emissions and Saharan dust as ice nuclei in the Amazon basin

    Anthony J. Prenni;Markus D. Petters;Sonia M. Kreidenweis;Colette L. Heald

  • Atmospheric aerosols in Amazonia and land use change: from natural biogenic to biomass burning conditions

    Paulo Artaxo;Luciana V. Rizzo;Joel F. Brito;Henrique M. J. Barbosa

  • Images reveal that atmospheric particles can undergo liquid-liquid phase separations

    Yuan You;Lindsay Renbaum-Wolff;Marc Carreras-Sospedra;Sarah J. Hanna

  • Chemical mechanism of inorganic oxidants in the TiO2/UV process: increased rates of degradation of chlorinated hydrocarbons.

    Scott T. Martin;Albert T. Lee;Michael R. Hoffmann

  • Biogenic Potassium Salt Particles as Seeds for Secondary Organic Aerosol in the Amazon

    Christopher Pöhlker;Kenia T. Wiedemann;Kenia T. Wiedemann;Kenia T. Wiedemann;Bärbel Sinha;Manabu Shiraiwa

  • Aqueous production of secondary organic aerosol from fossil-fuel emissions in winter Beijing haze.

    Junfeng Wang;Jianhuai Ye;Qi Zhang;Jian Zhao

  • Phase Transitions of Aqueous Atmospheric Particles

    S. T. Martin;H. Hung

Frequent Co-Authors

Paulo Artaxo
Paulo Artaxo Universidade de São Paulo
Qi Chen
Qi Chen Peking University
Meinrat O. Andreae
Meinrat O. Andreae Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Ulrich Pöschl
Ulrich Pöschl Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
John E. Shilling
John E. Shilling Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder
Allan K. Bertram
Allan K. Bertram University of British Columbia
Delphine K. Farmer
Delphine K. Farmer Colorado State University
Alex Guenther
Alex Guenther University of California, Irvine
Stephan Borrmann
Stephan Borrmann Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degree programs that can complement your career goals. For those interested in expanding their expertise into social aspects of the environment, affordable options like dsw online programs offer valuable skills in social work, focusing on sustainable community development.

If you're seeking versatility and flexibility, pursuing a budget friendly online general studies degree can provide a broad educational foundation that supports diverse career pathways within environmental sectors without the high costs.

For students prioritizing ease and manageability in their coursework, some of the easy bachelor's degree options online can help accelerate graduation while still contributing relevant knowledge applicable to environmental roles.

Specialized scientific training is crucial in Environmental Sciences, and a geoscience online degree directly aligns with this, offering technical skills to study Earth's processes. This path enhances opportunities in research, conservation, and environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing Scot T. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles