World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5599 5368 375 367 166 7600

Fred Hattermann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fred Hattermann between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fred Hattermann published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2016. 12 of the 183 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2016. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 13 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 6 publications
2001 2025

183 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fred Hattermann: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 2
2005 7
2006 2
2007 7
2008 14
2009 5
2010 4
2011 1
2012 13
2013 9
2014 10
2015 14
2016 15
2017 13
2018 15
2019 4
2020 6
2021 11
2022 3
2023 13
2024 6
2025 6
Total 183
Download as CSV

Fred Hattermann publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred Hattermann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 166 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444 166
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Fred Hattermann D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fred Hattermann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Fred Hattermann is affiliated with the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. Their work is situated within the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on areas such as Global and Planetary Change, Water Science and Technology, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Sociology and Political Science.

The primary topics of Fred Hattermann's research include Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Climate variability and models, Hydrology and Drought Analysis, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, Climate change impacts on agriculture, and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Fred Hattermann are Valentina Krysanova, Christoph Menz, Iulii Didovets, Axel Bronstert, and Bijan Fallah.

Fred Hattermann has contributed publications to several notable scientific venues. These include Climatic Change, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies, Scientific Reports, Environmental Research Letters, and Geoscientific model development.

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by Fred Hattermann are:

  • Scenario setup and forcing data for impact model evaluation and impact attribution within the third round of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP3a), 2024, Geoscientific model development
  • Central Asian rivers under climate change: Impacts assessment in eight representative catchments, 2021, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
  • Towards a more consistent eco-hydrological modelling through multi-objective calibration: a case study in the Andean Vilcanota River basin, Peru, 2020, Hydrological Sciences Journal
  • Climate change impact on water availability of main river basins in Ukraine, 2020, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies
  • Anthropogenic influence on extreme temperature and precipitation in Central Asia, 2023, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Assessing the impacts of 1.5 °C global warming - simulation protocol of the Inter-Sectoral Impact Model Intercomparison Project (ISIMIP2b)

    Katja Frieler;Stefan Lange;Franziska Piontek;Christopher P. O. Reyer

  • Changes in impacts of climate extremes: Human systems and ecosystems

    John Handmer;Yasushi Honda;Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz;Nigel Arnell

  • Evaluation of sources of uncertainty in projected hydrological changes under climate change in 12 large-scale river basins

    Tobias Vetter;Julia Reinhardt;Martina Flörke;Ann van Griensven;Ann van Griensven

  • How the performance of hydrological models relates to credibility of projections under climate change

    Valentina Krysanova;Chantal Donnelly;Alexander Gelfan;Dieter Gerten

  • Differences in flood hazard projections in Europe–their causes and consequences for decision making

    Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz;V. Krysanova;R. Dankers;Y. Hirabayashi

  • Comparing impacts of climate change on streamflow in four large African river basins

    V. Aich;S. Liersch;T. Vetter;S. Huang

  • Cross‐scale intercomparison of climate change impacts simulated by regional and global hydrological models in eleven large river basins

    Fred Hattermann;V. Krysanova;Simon N. Gosling;Rutger Dankers

  • Development of the ecohydrological model SWIM for regional impact studies and vulnerability assessment

    Valentina Krysanova;Fred Hattermann;Frank Wechsung

  • Sources of uncertainty in hydrological climate impact assessment: a cross-scale study

    Fred Hattermann;Tobias Vetter;Tobias Vetter;Lutz Breuer;Buda Su

  • A comparison of changes in river runoff from multiple global and catchment-scale hydrological models under global warming scenarios of 1 °C, 2 °C and 3 °C

    Simon N. Gosling;Jamal Zaherpour;Nick J. Mount;Fred F. Hattermann

  • Integrating wetlands and riparian zones in river basin modelling

    F.F. Hattermann;V. Krysanova;A. Habeck;A. Bronstert;A. Bronstert

  • Multi-model climate impact assessment and intercomparison for three large-scale river basins on three continents

    T. Vetter;S. Huang;V. Aich;T. Yang

  • Intercomparison of regional-scale hydrological models and climate change impacts projected for 12 large river basins worldwide—a synthesis

    Valentina Krysanova;Tobias Vetter;Stephanie Eisner;Shaochun Huang;Shaochun Huang

  • Climate change in Afghanistan deduced from reanalysis and coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (CORDEX)—South Asia Simulations

    Valentin Aich;Noor Ahmad Akhundzadah;Alec Knuerr;Ahmad Jamshed Khoshbeen

  • Flood projections within the Niger River Basin under future land use and climate change.

    Valentin Aich;Stefan Liersch;Tobias Vetter;Samuel Fournet

  • Runoff simulations on the macroscale with the ecohydrological model SWIM in the Elbe catchment–validation and uncertainty analysis

    F. F. Hattermann;Martin Wattenbach;V. Krysanova;F. Wechsung

  • Projections of climate change impacts on floods and droughts in Germany using an ensemble of climate change scenarios

    Shaochun Huang;Valentina Krysanova;Fred Hattermann

  • Parameter and input data uncertainty estimation for the assessment of long-term soil organic carbon dynamics

    Joachim Post;Fred F. Hattermann;Valentina Krysanova;Felicitas Suckow

  • Climate change adaptation and sustainable regional development: a case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg, Germany

    Christopher Reyer;Johann Bachinger;Ralf Bloch;Fred F. Hattermann

  • Simulation of spatiotemporal dynamics of water fluxes in Germany under climate change.

    Shaochun Huang;Valentina Krysanova;Hermann Österle;Fred F. Hattermann

  • The water resource implications of changing climate in the Volta River Basin [Africa].

    Unknown

  • Implications of complexity and uncertainty for integrated modelling and impact assessment in river basins

    Valentina Krysanova;Fred Hattermann;Frank Wechsung

Frequent Co-Authors

Valentina Krysanova
Valentina Krysanova Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Shaochun Huang
Shaochun Huang Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz
Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Tao Yang
Tao Yang Hohai University
Axel Bronstert
Axel Bronstert University of Potsdam
Simon N. Gosling
Simon N. Gosling University of Nottingham
Martin Wattenbach
Martin Wattenbach University of Aberdeen
Berit Arheimer
Berit Arheimer Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute
Eric D. Galbraith
Eric D. Galbraith McGill University
Derek P. Tittensor
Derek P. Tittensor Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities and complementary fields. Many students enhance their expertise by pursuing related online degrees that align with environmental challenges and societal needs.

For those interested in spatial data analysis and mapping, exploring colleges with GIS programs can be a valuable step. Geographic Information Systems play a crucial role in environmental planning and resource management.

Professionals aiming for leadership roles in public administration might consider high-impact programs like the one year MPA, which equips graduates with the skills needed to navigate environmental policies and public sector challenges efficiently.

Integrating social perspectives is vital in addressing environmental issues. An best online bachelor degree in sociology complements environmental studies by deepening understanding of human behavior, communities, and environmental justice.

For those pursuing advanced research or academic careers without the traditional dissertation path, exploring doctoral programs online no dissertation offers flexible options to continue education while focusing on applied aspects of environmental sciences and education.

Best Scientists Citing Fred Hattermann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles