World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
40
Citations
5172
World Ranking
6193
National Ranking
2101

Richard M. DeGraaf publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. DeGraaf sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard M. DeGraaf D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. DeGraaf sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. DeGraaf is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States.

Currently, there are no available records of recent papers authored by Richard M. DeGraaf. Similarly, data about frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work are not provided for this researcher.

No awards or distinctions linked to Richard M. DeGraaf have been documented in the current dataset.

This profile focuses on verified and accessible professional information as per the source data, without speculation beyond the available facts.

Best Publications

  • New England Wildlife: Habitat, Natural History, and Distribution

    Richard M. DeGraaf;Deborah D. Rudis

  • Options for managing early-successional forest and shrubland bird habitats in the northeastern United States

    Richard M DeGraaf;Mariko Yamasaki

  • Exploring the ecology of suburban wildlife

    Stephen DeStefano;Richard M. DeGraaf

  • Habitat selection and habitat‐specific survival of fledgling ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla)

    D. I. King;R. M. Degraaf;M.‐L. Smith;J. P. Buonaccorsi

  • Bird species diversity and nesting success in mature, clearcut and shelterwood forest in northern New Hampshire, USA

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf

  • Assessing remotely triggered cameras for surveying carnivore distribution

    Trina L. Moruzzi;Todd K. Fuller;Richard M. Degraaf;Robert T. Brooks

  • Effects of Clearcutting on Habitat Use and Reproductive Success of the Ovenbird in Forested Landscapes

    D. I. King;C. R. Griffin;R. M. Degraaf

  • Associations between breeding bird abundance and stand structure in the White Mountains, New Hampshire and Maine, USA

    Richard M. DeGraaf;Jay B. Hestbeck;Mariko Yamasaki

  • Avian guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities

    Richard M. DeGraaf;James M. Wentworth

  • Predation on artificial nests in forested riparian buffer strips

    W. Matthew Vander Haegen;Richard M. Degraaf

  • Housing developments in rural New England: effects on forest birds

    Daniel A. Kluza;Curtice R. Griffin;Richard M. Degraaf

  • Do Predation Rates on Artificial Nests Accurately Reflect Predation Rates on Natural Bird Nests

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf;Curtice R. Griffin;Thomas J. Maier

  • Effects of thinning and deer browsing on breeding birds in New England oak woodlands

    Richard M. DeGraaf;William M. Healy;Robert T. Brooks

  • PREDATION ON REAL AND ARTIFICIAL NESTS IN SHRUBSTEPPE LANDSCAPES FRAGMENTED BY AGRICULTURE

    W. Matthew Vander Haegen;Michael A. Schroeder;Richard M. DeGraaf

  • A nondestructive technique to monitor the relative abundance of terrestrial salamanders

    Richard M. DeGraaf;Mariko. Yamasaki

  • PREDATION ON JAPANESE QUAIL VS. HOUSE SPARROW EGGS IN ARTIFICIAL NESTS: SMALL EGGS REVEAL SMALL PREDATORS

    Thomas J. Maier;Richard M. DeGraaf

  • Herpetofaunal species composition and relative abundance among three New England forest types

    Richard M. Degraaf;Deborah D. Rudis

  • EFFECT OF CLEARCUT BORDERS ON DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF FOREST BIRDS IN NORTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE

    David I. King;Curtice R. Griffin;Richard M. Degraaf

  • Edge-related nest predation in clearcut and groupcut stands.

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf;Curtice R. Griffin

  • New England wildlife: management forested habitats

    Richard M. DeGraaf;Mariko Yamasaki;William B. Leak;John W. Lanier

  • Conservation of faunal diversity in forested landscapes.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

David I. King
David I. King University of Massachusetts Amherst
Todd K. Fuller
Todd K. Fuller University of Massachusetts Amherst
Wenjun Li
Wenjun Li University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Per Angelstam
Per Angelstam Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your education in Ecology and Evolution can open diverse career opportunities—from field research to environmental policy, education, and conservation leadership. Many students consider further studies in adjacent areas, such as healthcare, for broader job prospects. Exploring online direct entry msn programs is a fast route for non-nurses interested in transitioning to nursing or combining biology expertise with healthcare.

If you’re weighing your options, comparing programs like chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program helps you assess which online path best suits your needs, whether you already have a science background or are just starting out. For those with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, bsn to msn online programs offer flexible, affordable options to rise into advanced practice or research roles.

When choosing any online degree, accreditation and nonprofit status matter. Quality and value are essential in your educational investment, so consider attending one of the non profit online colleges to ensure your degree is respected and recognized in academic and professional circles.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. DeGraaf

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles