World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Amanda D. Rodewald

Amanda D. Rodewald

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
49
Citations
9149
World Ranking
4032
National Ranking
1409

Amanda D. Rodewald publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda D. Rodewald sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 200 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Amanda D. Rodewald D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda D. Rodewald sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Amanda D. Rodewald is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States and is an active researcher in environmental science, with a focus on ecology and conservation. Their work spans several subfields including ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, global and planetary change, ecological modeling, and nature and landscape conservation.

The main topics of their research include wildlife ecology and conservation, avian ecology and behavior, species distribution and climate change, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, plant and animal studies, animal behavior and reproduction, and conservation, biodiversity, and resource management.

Recent publications by Amanda D. Rodewald highlight various aspects of ornithology, biodiversity, and environmental impacts on species distribution. Notable papers include:

  • "A roadmap to identifying and filling shortfalls in Neotropical ornithology" (2020), published in The Auk
  • "Noise level and water distance drive resident and migratory bird species richness within a Neotropical megacity" (2020), published in Landscape and Urban Planning
  • "Mapping the planet's critical areas for biodiversity and nature's contributions to people" (2024), published in Nature Communications
  • "Conservation cobenefits from air pollution regulation: Evidence from birds" (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A Double machine learning trend model for citizen science data" (2023), published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Their frequent coauthors include Matthew Strimas-Mackey, Richard Schuster, Alison Johnston, Viviana Ruiz-Gutiérrez, and Rachel Neugarten, with collaboration counts ranging from 11 to 16 publications each.

They have multiple publications in several venues with the highest number found in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) at 10 publications. Other frequent journals include Biological Conservation with 6 publications, SSRN Electronic Journal with 5 publications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences with 3 publications, and Conservation Biology with 3 publications.

In 2017, Amanda D. Rodewald was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • The eBird enterprise: An integrated approach to development and application of citizen science

    Brian L. Sullivan;Jocelyn L. Aycrigg;Jessie H. Barry;Rick E. Bonney

  • Anthropogenic resource subsidies decouple predator–prey relationships

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Laura J. Kearns;Daniel P. Shustack

  • NEST PREDATION IN AN URBANIZING LANDSCAPE:THE ROLE OF EXOTIC SHRUBS

    Kathi L. Borgmann;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • Using open access observational data for conservation action: A case study for birds

    Brian L. Sullivan;Tina Phillips;Ashley A. Dayer;Christopher L. Wood

  • INFLUENCE OF LANDSCAPE COMPOSITION ON AVIAN COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND ASSOCIATED MECHANISMS

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Richard H. Yahner

  • Are urban forests ecological traps for understory birds? An examination using Northern cardinals

    Lionel F.V. Leston;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • Can regenerating clearcuts benefit mature-forest songbirds? An examination of post-breeding ecology

    Andrew C. Vitz;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • What is the appropriate paradigm for riparian forest conservation

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Marja H. Bakermans

  • The role of atmospheric conditions in the seasonal dynamics of North American migration flyways

    Frank A. La Sorte;Daniel Fink;Wesley M. Hochachka;Andrew Farnsworth

  • Influence of Condition and Habitat use on Survival of Post-Fledging Songbirds

    Andrew C. Vitz;Andrew C. Vitz;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • Forest Restoration in Urbanizing Landscapes: Interactions Between Land Uses and Exotic Shrubs

    Kathi L. Borgmann;Kathi L. Borgmann;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • Exotic shrubs as ephemeral ecological traps for nesting birds

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Daniel P. Shustack;Lauren E. Hitchcock

  • Quality as a Driver of Sustainable Agricultural Value Chains: The Case of the Relationship Coffee Model

    J Nicolas Hernandez-Aguilera;Miguel I Gómez;Amanda D Rodewald;Ximena Rueda

  • Urban flight: understanding individual and population-level responses of Nearctic–Neotropical migratory birds to urbanization

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Daniel P. Shustack

  • Floristics and avian community structure: Implications for regional changes in eastern forest composition

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Marc David Abrams

  • Conserving Biodiversity in Urbanizing Areas: Nontraditional Views from a Bird’s Perspective

    John M. Marzluff;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • Consumer resource matching in urbanizing landscapes: are synanthropic species over-matching?

    Amanda D. Rodewald;Daniel P. Shustack

  • Positive relationships between association strength and phenotypic similarity characterize the assembly of mixed-species bird flocks worldwide.

    Hari Sridhar;Umesh Srinivasan;Robert A Askins;Julio Cesar Canales-Delgadillo

  • VEGETATIVE AND FRUIT RESOURCES AS DETERMINANTS OF HABITAT USE BY MATURE-FOREST BIRDS DURING THE POSTBREEDING PERIOD

    Andrew C. Vitz;Amanda D. Rodewald

  • Forest structure affects trophic linkages: How silvicultural disturbance impacts bats and their insect prey

    Luke E. Dodd;Michael J. Lacki;Eric R. Britzke;David A. Buehler

  • The importance of land uses within the landscape matrix

    Amanda D. Rodewald

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Arcese
Peter Arcese University of British Columbia
Wesley M. Hochachka
Wesley M. Hochachka Cornell University
Alison Johnston
Alison Johnston Cornell University
Pablo M. Vergara
Pablo M. Vergara University of Santiago Chile
Richard H. Yahner
Richard H. Yahner Pennsylvania State University
Catherine L. Kling
Catherine L. Kling Cornell University
Stephen N. Matthews
Stephen N. Matthews The Ohio State University
Frank A. La Sorte
Frank A. La Sorte Cornell University
André A. Dhondt
André A. Dhondt Cornell University
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to diverse academic and professional routes. If you’re considering adjacent fields or complementary skills, several online degrees offer flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in information systems, check out what schools offer library science degrees. Library science can complement research skills valuable in ecology-based careers.

Communication and language science is another promising path. There are asha accredited online slp programs for those wishing to become speech-language pathologists. If you already have a degree outside SLP, consider an slp bridge program for a faster transition.

Alternatively, if healthcare appeals to you, accelerated nursing studies are available. Review the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs to see your options for entering the nursing workforce quickly.

Each of these paths offers online learning, skills development, and an opportunity to make a meaningful impact in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda D. Rodewald

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles