World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
53
Citations
13217
World Ranking
3241
National Ranking
1146

John Faaborg publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Faaborg sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John Faaborg D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Faaborg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John Faaborg is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with particular attention to subfields such as global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, and ecology.

Their body of work explores a range of topics involving marine and fisheries research, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, wildlife ecology and conservation, and the effects of fire on ecosystems. This multidisciplinary approach reflects engagement with both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Avian community response to experimental forest management," 2020, published in Ecosphere
  • "Puerto Rican Bullfinch (Melopyrrha portoricensis)," 2022, published in Birds of the World
  • "Puerto Rican Bullfinch (Melopyrrha portoricensis)," 2020, published in Birds of the World
  • "Puerto Rican Bullfinch (Melopyrrha portoricensis)," 2021, published in Birds of the World

Frequent collaborators in Faaborg's research include Amber Wiewel, David R. Hollie, Andrew D. George, Paul A. Porneluzi, and Janet M. Haslerig.

The scientist's publications appear mainly in the venues Birds of the World and Ecosphere, with a higher number of papers in Birds of the World.

In recognition of their work, Faaborg was elected as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Regional Forest Fragmentation and the Nesting Success of Migratory Birds

    Scott K. Robinson;Frank R. Thompson Iii;Therese M. Donovan;Donald R. Whitehead

  • Reproductive Success of Migratory Birds in Habitat Sources and Sinks

    Therese M. Donovan;Frank R. Thompson;John Faaborg;John R. Probst

  • Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone

    J. Faaborg;M. Brittingham;T. Donovan;J. Blake

  • Partners in Flight North American Landbird Conservation Plan

    John Faaborg

  • Conserving migratory land birds in the new world: do we know enough?

    John Faaborg;Richard T. Holmes;Angela D. Anders;Keith L. Bildstein

  • Recent advances in understanding migration systems of New World land birds

    John Faaborg;Richard T. Holmes;Angela D. Anders;Keith L. Bildstein

  • Juvenile Survival in a Population of Neotropical Migrant Birds

    Angela D. Anders;Donald C. Dearborn;John Faaborg;Frank R. Thompson

  • Effects of prairie fragmentation on the nest success of breeding birds in the midcontinental United States

    James R. Herkert;Dan L. Reinking;David A. Wiedenfeld;Maiken Winter

  • Patterns of Area Sensitivity in Grassland-Nesting Birds

    Maiken Winter;John Faaborg

  • Postfledging dispersal, habitat use, and home-range size of juvenile wood Thrushes

    Angela D. Anders;John Faaborg;Frank R. Thompson

  • Evidence for edge effects on multiple levels in tallgrass prairie

    Maiken Winter;Douglas H. Johnson;John Faaborg

  • Post-fledging survival in passerine birds and the value of post-fledging studies to conservation

    W. Andrew Cox;Frank R. Iii Thompson;Allison S. Cox;John Faaborg

  • Estimating the Viability of Ovenbird and Kentucky Warbler Populations in Forest Fragments

    James P. Gibbs;John Faaborg

  • Saturation of Bird Communities in the West Indies

    John W. Terborgh;John Faaborg

  • Modeling the effects of habitat fragmentation on source and sink demography of neotropical migrant birds

    Therese M. Donovan;Roland H. Lamberson;Allison Kimber;Frank R. Thompson

  • Effects of prairie fragmentation on predation on artificial nests

    Leslie D. Burger;Loren W. Burger;John Faaborg

  • Season‐Long Fecundity, Survival, and Viability of Ovenbirds in Fragmented and Unfragmented Landscapes

    Paul A. Porneluzi;John Faaborg

  • AVIAN HABITAT MANAGEMENT MEETS CONSPECIFIC ATTRACTION: IF YOU BUILD IT, WILL THEY COME?

    Marissa A. Ahlering;John Faaborg

  • DEMOGRAPHIC AND POPULATION RESPONSES OF CAPE MAY WARBLERS WINTERING IN MULTIPLE HABITATS

    Steven C. Latta;John Faaborg

  • Effects of Experimental Forest Management on Density and Nesting Success of Bird Species in Missouri Ozark Forests

    Wendy K. Gram;Paul A. Porneluzi;Richard L. Clawson;John Faaborg

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank R. Thompson
Frank R. Thompson US Forest Service
Douglas H. Johnson
Douglas H. Johnson United States Geological Survey
Keith A. Hobson
Keith A. Hobson University of Western Ontario
Scott K. Robinson
Scott K. Robinson University of Florida
Joshua J. Millspaugh
Joshua J. Millspaugh University of Montana
John Terborgh
John Terborgh Duke University
Peter P. Marra
Peter P. Marra Georgetown University
Keith L. Bildstein
Keith L. Bildstein Hawk Mountain Sanctuary
Stephen I. Rothstein
Stephen I. Rothstein University of California, Santa Barbara
Patricia G. Parker
Patricia G. Parker University of Missouri–St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often opens doors to a wide range of interdisciplinary careers. If you’re interested in a flexible educational journey, accredited online programs offer accessible options for diverse learners, from those seeking specialized degrees to individuals balancing work or military service.

Many students pursue their passion for biology by combining it with healthcare. For example, programs like the bsn to msn bridge pathway enable nurses to advance their studies and specialize in fields impacted by environmental health.

For those looking for credibility and strong support services, consider the nonprofit online universities leading the way in delivering quality science education. Students with military backgrounds can benefit from the best military friendly colleges that understand specific needs and provide generous support.

If your interest in ecology extends to community issues, a degree such as an online masters in social work could lead to roles addressing environmental justice and advocacy. The variety of online degrees ensures that wherever your career goals lie, there’s a pathway tailored for you.

Best Scientists Citing John Faaborg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles