World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6578 6123 386 376 132 11883

Peter Hassmén publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter Hassmén between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter Hassmén published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2016. 15 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2016. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
1980 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter Hassmén: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 6
1992 1
1993 1
1994 4
1995 4
1996 5
1997 3
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 5
2002 3
2003 1
2004 3
2005 2
2006 8
2007 4
2008 5
2009 7
2010 3
2011 6
2012 1
2013 4
2014 2
2015 11
2016 13
2017 5
2018 8
2019 7
2020 4
2021 3
2022 3
2023 5
2024 6
2025 9
Total 162
Download as CSV

Peter Hassmén publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hassmén sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 132 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 132
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter Hassmén D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Hassmén sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Peter Hassmén is affiliated with Southern Cross University in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine. Their research includes 41 publications in psychology and 15 in medicine, with notable focus on clinical psychology, developmental and educational psychology, and social psychology. Their work also spans orthopedics and sports medicine, along with general health professions.

Their main research topics cover sport psychology and performance, motivation and self-concept in sports, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, as well as sports injuries and prevention. Additional focus areas include injury epidemiology and prevention, mindfulness and compassion interventions, and emotional intelligence and performance.

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • International Psychogeriatrics
  • Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • Research in Dance Education

Among their recent papers are:

  • Training monitoring methods used in the field by coaches and practitioners: A systematic review (2020), International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
  • Participant perspectives of a telehealth trial investigating the use of telephone and text message support in obesity management: a qualitative evaluation (2021), BMC Health Services Research
  • Depression, childhood trauma, and physical activity in older Indigenous Australians (2021), International Psychogeriatrics
  • Intervention strategies for enhancing movement competencies in youth athletes: A narrative systematic review (2020), International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
  • Do Group Mindfulness-Based Interventions Improve Emotion Regulation in Children? A Systematic Review (2023), Journal of Child and Family Studies

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Peter Hassmén include Emily Hindman, Christopher J. Stevens, Georgia Rowland, and Hannah McGuigan.

Peter Hassmén has also authored books published by notable publishers. These include Heat Acclimation for Special Populations published by Frontiers Media in 2020, and an upcoming book titled Emotion Control Strategies for Peak Performance in Neurodivergent Brains scheduled for 2025 with Palgrave Macmillan.

Best Publications

  • Physical exercise and psychological well-being: a population study in Finland.

    Peter Hassmén;Nathalie Koivula;Antti Uutela

  • Overtraining and recovery. A conceptual model.

    Göran Kenttä;Peter Hassmén

  • Perceived exertion related to heart rate and blood lactate during arm and leg exercise.

    Gunnar Borg;Peter Hassmén;Monica Lagerström

  • Sources and effects of low-frequency noise.

    Birgitta Berglund;Peter Hassmén;R. F. Soames Job

  • Psychophysiological stress and EMG activity of the trapezius muscle.

    Ulf Lundberg;Roland Kadefors;Bo Melin;Gunnar Palmerud

  • Administration of branched-chain amino acids during sustained exercise--effects on performance and on plasma concentration of some amino acids.

    E. Blomstrand;P. Hassmén;B. Ekblom;E. A. Newsholme

  • Determinants of adherence to lifestyle intervention in adults with obesity: a systematic review

    Emily Burgess;Peter Hassmen;Peter Hassmen;Kate Pumpa

  • A qualitative analysis of burnout in elite Swedish athletes

    Henrik Gustafsson;Peter Hassmén;Peter Hassmén;Göran Kenttä;Mattias Johansson

  • Athlete burnout: an integrated model and future research directions

    Henrik Gustafsson;Göran Kenttä;Peter Hassmén

  • Prevalence of Burnout in Competitive Adolescent Athletes

    Henrik Gustafsson;Göran Kenttä;Peter Hassmén;Carolina Lundqvist

  • Training practices and overtraining syndrome in Swedish age-group athletes.

    Göran Kenttä;Peter Hassmén;J S Raglin

  • Self-esteem and perfectionism in elite athletes: effects on competitive anxiety and self-confidence

    Nathalie Koivula;Peter Hassmén;Johan Fallby;Johan Fallby

  • Peer motivational climate and burnout perceptions of adolescent athletes

    Alan L. Smith;Henrik Gustafsson;Henrik Gustafsson;Peter Hassmén

  • Behavioural treatment strategies improve adherence to lifestyle intervention programmes in adults with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Emily Burgess;Peter Hassmen;Peter Hassmen;Marijke Welvaert;Marijke Welvaert;Kate Pumpa

  • Influence of ingesting a solution of branched-chain amino acids on perceived exertion during exercise

    Eva Blomstrand;Peter Hassmén;S Ek;Björn Ekblom

  • Self-monitored exercise at three different RPE intensities in treadmill vs field running.

    Ruggero Ceci;Peter Hassmén

  • Treating Major Depression with Physical Activity: A Systematic Overview with Recommendations

    Markus B. T. Nyström;Gregory Neely;Peter Hassmén;Per Carlbring

  • Depression and Exercise in Elderly Men and Women: Findings from the Swedish National Study on Aging and Care

    Magnus Lindwall;Mikael Rennemark;Anders Halling;Johan Berglund

  • An interpretative phenomenological analysis of burnout and recovery in elite soccer coaches

    Erik Lundkvist;Henrik Gustafsson;Sören Hjälm;Peter Hassmén

  • The role of exercise and gender for physical self-perceptions and importance ratings in Swedish university students

    Magnus Lindwall;Peter Hassmén;Peter Hassmén

  • Mood state monitoring of training and recovery in elite kayakers

    Göran Kenttä;Peter Hassmén;John S Raglin

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik Gustafsson
Henrik Gustafsson Karlstad University
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Per Carlbring
Per Carlbring Stockholm University
Richard Keegan
Richard Keegan University of Canberra
Andreas Stenling
Andreas Stenling Umeå University
Magnus Lindwall
Magnus Lindwall University of Gothenburg
Björn Ekblom
Björn Ekblom Karolinska Institute
Eric A. Newsholme
Eric A. Newsholme University of Oxford
John S. Raglin
John S. Raglin Indiana University
Alan L. Smith
Alan L. Smith Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in psychology, a range of related online degrees and professional certifications can help you succeed in specialized fields. Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) certification is one of the most recognized credentials for those interested in applied behavior analysis. Requirements can differ by city and state; for example, aspiring professionals should review Los Angeles bcba education requirements to understand local expectations.

Similarly, if you’re planning to work in other regions, you should familiarize yourself with area-specific guidelines—like the bcba certification requirements in Louisville or the steps for becoming a bcba in Lubbock. Each location may have unique coursework, supervised hours, and examination criteria.

It’s important to also consider job prospects and local demand when choosing your pathway. Resources detailing bcba certification requirements in Madison can help you prepare effectively for a competitive job market. Exploring these options will ensure that you select an educational and professional route aligned with your goals and regional requirements.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Hassmén

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles