World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
4344
World Ranking
7636
National Ranking
2566

David I. King publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David I. King sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 130 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

David I. King D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David I. King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

David I. King is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a significant portion dedicated to ecology and related subfields.

The main fields of study addressed in their work include:

  • Environmental Science

They have contributed extensively within several subfields, such as:

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Insect Science

The main topics in their research cover diverse aspects of natural systems and species interactions:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • Michael E. Akresh
  • H. Patrick Roberts
  • Joan Milam
  • Jeffery L. Larkin
  • Michael J. Cunningham-Minnick

David I. King has been published multiple times in select journals, with these venues representing their more common outlets:

  • Ecology and Evolution
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Journal of Field Ornithology
  • Conservation Science and Practice
  • Forests

Representative recent papers include:

  • Pollinator communities vary with vegetation structure and time since management within regenerating timber harvests of the Central Appalachian Mountains, 2021, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Is the future female for turtles? Climate change and wetland configuration predict sex ratios of a freshwater species, 2023, Global Change Biology
  • The contribution of canopy samples to assessments of forestry effects on native bees, 2022, Conservation Science and Practice
  • Crop-specific effectiveness of birds as agents of pest control, 2023, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
  • Sampling the understory, midstory, and canopy is necessary to fully characterize native bee communities of temperate forests and their dynamic environmental relationships, 2024, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Best Publications

  • Inference about density and temporary emigration in unmarked populations

    Richard B. Chandler;J. Andrew Royle;David I. King

  • Nonrandom Processes Maintain Diversity in Tropical Forests

    Christopher Wills;Kyle E. Harms;Richard Condit;David King

  • Habitat selection and habitat‐specific survival of fledgling ovenbirds (Seiurus aurocapilla)

    D. I. King;R. M. Degraaf;M.‐L. Smith;J. P. Buonaccorsi

  • Coffee and conservation

    John H. Rappole;David I. King;Jorge H. Vega Rivera

  • Bird species diversity and nesting success in mature, clearcut and shelterwood forest in northern New Hampshire, USA

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf

  • Synthesis of the conservation value of the early-successional stage in forests of eastern North America

    David I. King;Scott Schlossberg

  • Effects of Clearcutting on Habitat Use and Reproductive Success of the Ovenbird in Forested Landscapes

    D. I. King;C. R. Griffin;R. M. Degraaf

  • A small-scale land-sparing approach to conserving biological diversity in tropical agricultural landscapes

    Richard B. Chandler;David I. King;Raul Raudales;Richard Trubey

  • Ecological and life-history traits explain recent boundary shifts in elevation and latitude of western North American songbirds

    Unknown

  • Do Predation Rates on Artificial Nests Accurately Reflect Predation Rates on Natural Bird Nests

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf;Curtice R. Griffin;Thomas J. Maier

  • An evaluation of powerline rights-of-way as habitat for early-successional shrubland birds

    David I. King;Bruce E. Byers

  • Summer Roosts of the Endangered Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) on the Northern Edge of Its Range

    Allen Kurta;David King;Joseph A. Teramino;John M. Stribley

  • Factors affecting bee communities in forest openings and adjacent mature forest

    Unknown

  • ARE SHRUBLAND BIRDS EDGE SPECIALISTS

    Scott Schlossberg;David I. King

  • Effects of width, edge and habitat on the abundance and nesting success of scrub-shrub birds in powerline corridors.

    David I. King;Richard B. Chandler;Jeffrey M. Collins;Wayne R. Petersen

  • Postlogging Succession and Habitat Usage of Shrubland Birds

    Scott Schlossberg;David I. King

  • Habitat quality and habitat selection of golden-winged warblers in Costa Rica: an application of hierarchical models for open populations

    Richard B. Chandler;David I. King

  • Do mature forest birds prefer early-successional habitat during the post-fledging period?

    Carlin C. Chandler;David I. King;Richard B. Chandler

  • EFFECT OF CLEARCUT BORDERS ON DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF FOREST BIRDS IN NORTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE

    David I. King;Curtice R. Griffin;Richard M. Degraaf

  • Edge-related nest predation in clearcut and groupcut stands.

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf;Curtice R. Griffin

  • Productivity of early successional shrubland birds in clearcuts and groupcuts in an eastern deciduous forest

    David I. King;Richard M. DeGraaf;Curtice R. Griffin

  • Scrub-Shrub Bird Habitat Associations at Multiple Spatial Scales in Beaver Meadows in Massachusetts

    Richard B. Chandler;David I. King;Stephen DeStefano

  • Modeling movement of West Nile virus in the Western hemisphere.

    John H. Rappole;Bradley W. Compton;Peter Leimgruber;Jamie Robertson

  • WINTER- VS. BREEDING-HABITAT LIMITATION FOR AN ENDANGERED AVIAN MIGRANT

    John H. Rappole;David I. King;Jeffrey Diez

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. DeGraaf
Richard M. DeGraaf University of Massachusetts Amherst
Peter P. Marra
Peter P. Marra Georgetown University
Peter Leimgruber
Peter Leimgruber Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Jeffrey M. Diez
Jeffrey M. Diez University of California, Riverside
Andrew J. Elmore
Andrew J. Elmore University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Christina M. Grozinger
Christina M. Grozinger Pennsylvania State University
J. Andrew Royle
J. Andrew Royle United States Geological Survey
Winsor H. Lowe
Winsor H. Lowe University of Montana
Matthew C. Fitzpatrick
Matthew C. Fitzpatrick University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Anthony W. D'Amato
Anthony W. D'Amato University of Vermont

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Ecology and Evolution opens doors to numerous related online degrees and career opportunities. Many students begin their journey by selecting a non profit university to ensure access to accredited programs with strong reputations and meaningful outcomes.

For those with military backgrounds, enrolling in an online college for military offers flexible options and support resources tailored to unique scheduling needs and career goals.

Graduates interested in the social aspects of environmental science often pursue lcsw online programs, which lead to licensed careers focused on supporting communities impacted by ecological change.

Additionally, an accelerated psychology degree online can be a strong fit for those interested in behavioral ecology or conservation psychology. These diverse study and career pathways empower students to combine their passion for the natural world with expertise in social science, mental health, and educational outreach.

Best Scientists Citing David I. King

Trending Scientists