World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
12443
World Ranking
6071
National Ranking
3297

Alan J. Hawkins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alan J. Hawkins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan J. Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alan J. Hawkins is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on social sciences and psychology, with numerous contributions in both broad and specialized fields.

Their scholarly output includes work concentrated in the following subfields:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Demography
  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Gender Studies

Hawkins's research topics reveal a sustained focus on family and interpersonal relationships along with developmental and gender-related dynamics, including:

  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies

Their recent publications illustrate contributions to the understanding of family and couple relationships, as well as adolescent psychosocial development. Selected papers include:

  • 'Associations between prosocial behavior, externalizing behaviors, and internalizing symptoms during adolescence: A meta-analysis' (2020), published in the Journal of Adolescence
  • 'Helping couples achieve relationship success: A decade of progress in couple relationship education research and practice, 2010-2019' (2021), published in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • 'Do Responsible Fatherhood Programs Work? A Comprehensive Meta-Analytic Study' (2020), published in Family Relations
  • 'The Sexual Mindfulness Project: An Initial Presentation of the Sexual and Relational Associations of Sexual Mindfulness' (2020), published in the Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy
  • 'How effective are ACF-funded couple relationship education programs? A meta-analytic study' (2022), published in Family Process

Hawkins frequently collaborates with several other researchers, including:

  • Erin K. Holmes
  • Braquel R. Egginton
  • Chelom E. Leavitt
  • Sarah Chobot Hokanson
  • David Simpson

Their research has regularly appeared in journals such as:

  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • Family Relations
  • Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
  • Journal of Adolescence
  • Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy

Best Publications

  • Maternal Gatekeeping: Mothers' Beliefs and Behaviors That Inhibit Greater Father Involvement in Family Work

    Sarah M. Allen;Alan J. Hawkins

  • Finding an Extra Day a Week: The Positive Influence of Perceived Job Flexibility on Work and Family Life Balance*

    E. Jeffrey Hill;Alan J. Hawkins;Maria Ferris;Michelle Weitzman

  • Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study.

    Alan J. Hawkins;Victoria L. Blanchard;Scott A. Baldwin;Elizabeth B. Fawcett

  • The Inventory of Father Involvement: A Pilot Study of a New Measure of Father Involvement:

    Alan J. Hawkins;Kay P. Bradford;Rob Palkovitz;Shawn L. Christiansen

  • A cross‐cultural test of the work‐family interface in 48 countries

    E. Jeffrey Hill;Chongming Yang;Alan J. Hawkins;Maria Ferris

  • Investigating the effects of marriage and relationship education on couples' communication skills: a meta-analytic study.

    Victoria L. Blanchard;Alan J. Hawkins;Scott A. Baldwin;Elizabeth B. Fawcett

  • Work and family in the virtual office: Perceived influences of mobile telework.

    E. Jeffrey Hill;Alan J. Hawkins;Brent C. Miller

  • Does parental mediation of media influence child outcomes? A meta-analysis on media time, aggression, substance use, and sexual behavior.

    Kevin M. Collier;Sarah M. Coyne;Eric E. Rasmussen;Alan J. Hawkins

  • Generative fathering : beyond deficit perspectives

    Alan J. Hawkins;David C. Dollahite;John Snarey

  • Beyond Ticks and Clicks: The Need for More Diverse and Broader Conceptualizations and Measures of Father Involvement

    Alan J. Hawkins;Rob Palkovitz

  • Rethinking Fathers' Involvement in Child Care A Developmental Perspective

    Alan J. Hawkins;Shawn L. Christiansen;Kathryn Pond Sargent;E. Jeffrey Hill

  • Fatherwork: A Conceptual Ethic of Fathering as Generative Work

    David C. Dollahite;Alan J. Hawkins

  • Father's Presence and Young Children's Behavioral and Cognitive Adjustment

    Lisa J. Crockett;David J. Eggebeen;Alan J. Hawkins

  • Do premarital education programs really work? A meta-analytic study.

    Elizabeth B. Fawcett;Alan J. Hawkins;Victoria L. Blanchard;Jason S. Carroll

  • A comprehensive framework for marriage education

    Alan J Hawkins;Jason S Carroll;William J Doherty;Brian J Willoughby

  • Reasons for Divorce and Openness to Marital Reconciliation

    Alan J. Hawkins;Brian J. Willoughby;William J. Doherty

  • Associations between prosocial behavior, externalizing behaviors, and internalizing symptoms during adolescence: A meta-analysis.

    Madison K. Memmott-Elison;Hailey G. Holmgren;Laura M. Padilla-Walker;Alan J. Hawkins

  • Exploring Wives' Sense of Fairness About Family Work An Initial Test of the Distributive Justice Framework

    Alan J. Hawkins;Christina M. Marshall;Kathryn M. Meiners

  • Exploring programmatic moderators of the effectiveness of marriage and relationship education programs: a meta-analytic study.

    Alan J. Hawkins;Scott M. Stanley;Victoria L. Blanchard;Michael Albright

  • Does Relationship and Marriage Education for Lower-Income Couples Work? A Meta-Analytic Study of Emerging Research

    Alan J. Hawkins;Tamara A. Fackrell

  • A Conceptual Ethic of Generative Fathering

    David C. Dollahite;Alan J. Hawkins

  • The Time Bind: When Work Becomes Home and Home Becomes Work / Time for Life: The Surprising Way Americans Use Their Time

    Alan J. Hawkins;E. Jeffrey Hill;Arlie Russell Hochschild;John P. Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Dollahite
David C. Dollahite Brigham Young University
E. Jeffrey Hill
E. Jeffrey Hill Brigham Young University
David J. Eggebeen
David J. Eggebeen Pennsylvania State University
Howard J. Markman
Howard J. Markman University of Denver
Laura M. Padilla-Walker
Laura M. Padilla-Walker Brigham Young University
Brian J. Willoughby
Brian J. Willoughby Brigham Young University
Scott M. Stanley
Scott M. Stanley University of Denver
Scott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin Brigham Young University
Carolyn Pape Cowan
Carolyn Pape Cowan University of California, Berkeley
William J. Doherty
William J. Doherty University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and specialized career paths. One growing field is speech-language pathology, which blends psychological knowledge with communication science. Many students pursue a bachelor’s in psychology before entering a master’s program to become a licensed speech-language pathologist (SLP).

Each state maintains specific requirements for SLP certification. For example, the Delaware speech pathologist certification requirements detail the academic, practicum, and examination standards set by state boards. Similarly, those interested in Florida must review the slp requirements in Florida to ensure they meet all necessary credentials and supervised clinical experience.

If you are considering practicing in Georgia, be sure to check the Georgia slp certification requirements, which outline the steps for licensure. In Hawaii, aspiring professionals should familiarize themselves with the Hawaii slp certification requirements, as these may differ from other states.

Researching these pathways—and understanding regional variations—is crucial for planning your career after earning a psychology degree.

Best Scientists Citing Alan J. Hawkins

Trending Scientists