World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
10991
World Ranking
5415
National Ranking
2958

Galena K. Rhoades publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galena K. Rhoades sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Galena K. Rhoades D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Galena K. Rhoades sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Galena K. Rhoades is affiliated with the University of Denver in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, demography, sociology and political science, and health.

The scientist's work addresses several core topics, including:

  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Galena K. Rhoades has published extensively in scholarly journals, frequently contributing to:

  • Family Process
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Couple and Family Psychology Research and Practice
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy
  • Journal of Social and Personal Relationships

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Online programs improve relationship functioning for distressed low-income couples: Results from a nationwide randomized controlled trial, 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Helping couples achieve relationship success: A decade of progress in couple relationship education research and practice, 2010-2019, 2021, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • Within-Couple Associations Between Communication and Relationship Satisfaction Over Time, 2021, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Effects of ePREP and OurRelationship on Low-Income Couples' Mental Health and Health Behaviors: a Randomized Controlled Trial, 2020, Prevention Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Scott M. Stanley
  • Kayla Knopp
  • Charlie Huntington
  • Howard J. Markman
  • Nicholas S. Perry

Best Publications

  • The effect of the transition to parenthood on relationship quality: an 8-year prospective study.

    Brian D. Doss;Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • Sliding Versus Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect.

    Scott M. Stanley;Galena Kline Rhoades;Howard J. Markman

  • “Hooking Up” Among College Students: Demographic and Psychosocial Correlates

    Jesse J. Owen;Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Frank D. Fincham

  • Hitting home: relationships between recent deployment, posttraumatic stress symptoms, and marital functioning for Army couples.

    Elizabeth S. Allen;Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • The Premarital Communication Roots of Marital Distress and Divorce: The First Five Years of Marriage

    Howard J. Markman;Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Erica P. Ragan

  • Breaking up is hard to do: the impact of unmarried relationship dissolution on mental health and life satisfaction

    Galena K. Rhoades;Claire M. Kamp Dush;David C. Atkins;Scott M. Stanley

  • Relationship education research: current status and future directions.

    Howard J. Markman;Galena Kline Rhoades

  • Commitment: Functions, Formation, and the Securing of Romantic Attachment

    Scott M. Stanley;Galena K. Rhoades;Sarah W. Whitton

  • Viewing sexually-explicit materials alone or together: associations with relationship quality.

    Amanda M. Maddox;Galena K. Rhoades;Howard J. Markman

  • Machine learning uncovers the most robust self-report predictors of relationship quality across 43 longitudinal couples studies

    Samantha Joel;Paul W. Eastwick;Colleen J. Allison;Ximena B. Arriaga

  • Reasons for Divorce and Recollections of Premarital Intervention: Implications for Improving Relationship Education.

    Shelby B. Scott;Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Elizabeth S. Allen

  • Couples' Reasons for Cohabitation: Associations With Individual Well-Being and Relationship Quality

    Galena Kline Rhoades;Scott M Stanley;Howard J Markman

  • Family Emotional Processes and Adolescents' Adjustment

    Clare M. Stocker;Melissa K. Richmond;Galena K. Rhoades;Lisa Kiang

  • Effects of parental divorce on marital commitment and confidence.

    Sarah W. Whitton;Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • The transition to parenthood: impact on couples’ romantic relationships

    Brian D Doss;Galena K Rhoades

  • Should I Stay or Should I Go? Predicting Dating Relationship Stability from Four Aspects of Commitment

    Galena K. Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment.

    Galena Kline Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • Premarital precursors of marital infidelity.

    Elizabeth S. Allen;Galena Kline Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • Marital therapy, retreats, and books: the who, what, when, and why of relationship help-seeking.

    Brian D. Doss;Galena Kline Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

  • On the Home Front: Stress for Recently Deployed Army Couples

    Elizabeth S. Allen;Galena Kline Rhoades;Scott M. Stanley;Howard J. Markman

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard J. Markman
Howard J. Markman University of Denver
Scott M. Stanley
Scott M. Stanley University of Denver
Jesse Owen
Jesse Owen University of Denver
Frank D. Fincham
Frank D. Fincham Florida State University
Brian D. Doss
Brian D. Doss University of Miami
Sarah W. Whitton
Sarah W. Whitton University of Cincinnati
Brett T. Litz
Brett T. Litz Boston University
Alan L. Peterson
Alan L. Peterson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Terence M. Keane
Terence M. Keane Boston University
Alan J. Hawkins
Alan J. Hawkins Brigham Young University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens doors to a wide range of career paths and specialization options. When deciding between clinical therapist vs psychologist roles and responsibilities, it's important to consider differences in education, scope of practice, and state licensing requirements. Therapists often focus on counseling, while clinical psychologists may conduct assessments and research in addition to therapy.

If you’re thinking about pursuing advanced degrees, there are many career options phd psychology graduates can explore, from academic positions and research to specialized clinical work and consulting. Conversely, a master’s degree can also unlock unique fields—for example, there are numerous master's degree in sport psychology career paths available to those interested in working with athletes and organizations in sports.

Another growing area is organizational psychology, where practitioners focus on improving workplace well-being and business performance. Learn more about the organizational psychologist roles to understand how psychological expertise can shape modern business environments.

Best Scientists Citing Galena K. Rhoades

Trending Scientists