World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9129 8531 4840 4407 141 6866

Dean M. Busby publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dean M. Busby between 1962 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dean M. Busby published across 64 years, from 1962 to 2025, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2021. 8 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2021. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 6 publications
1962 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dean M. Busby: publications per year, 1962 to 2025
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 4
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 2
2009 4
2010 4
2011 7
2012 9
2013 11
2014 3
2015 7
2016 6
2017 12
2018 2
2019 7
2020 12
2021 16
2022 5
2023 7
2024 2
2025 6
Total 148
Download as CSV

Dean M. Busby publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean M. Busby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 141
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Dean M. Busby D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dean M. Busby sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Dean M. Busby is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with notable contributions to social psychology, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, and sociology and political science.

The scientist has focused research interests in the areas of attachment and relationship dynamics, sexual function and dysfunction studies, sexuality, behavior and technology, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, eating disorders and behaviors, as well as family dynamics and relationships.

Recent publications include:

  • "Linking Sexual Mindfulness to Mixed-Sex Couples' Relational Flourishing, Sexual Harmony, and Orgasm" (2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior)
  • "Is It Still Possible to Collect Nationally Representative Marriage Data in the United States? A Case Study From the CREATE Project" (2021, Family Relations)
  • "When Is Enough Enough? Orgasm's Curvilinear Association With Relational and Sexual Satisfaction" (2020, The Journal of Sexual Medicine)
  • "The sexual wholeness model: An initial evaluation with two samples" (2021, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy)
  • "Do You Feel in Control? Sexual Desire, Sexual Passion Expression, and Associations with Perceived Compulsivity to Pornography and Pornography Use Frequency" (2020, Sexuality Research and Social Policy)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Dean M. Busby include:

  • Chelom E. Leavitt
  • Veronica Hanna-Walker
  • Nathan D. Leonhardt
  • Jeremy B. Yorgason
  • Erin K. Holmes

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in specific venues, reflecting their areas of expertise. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Family Process
  • Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy

Best Publications

  • A REVISION OF THE DYADIC ADJUSTMENT SCALE FOR USE WITH DISTRESSED AND NONDISTRESSED COUPLES: CONSTRUCT HIERARCHY AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALES

    Dean M. Busby;Clark Christensen;D. Russell Crane;Jeffry H. Larson

  • RELATE: Relationship Evaluation of the Individual, Family, Cultural, and Couple Contexts*

    Dean M. Busby;Thomas B. Holman;Narumi Taniguchi

  • "I Luv U :)!": A Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships

    Sarah Coyne;Laura Ann Stockdale;Dean Busby;Bethany Iverson

  • Pornography Use: Who Uses It and How It Is Associated with Couple Outcomes

    Franklin O. Poulsen;Dean M. Busby;Adam M. Galovan

  • The Delphi Method

    Linda Stone Fish;Dean M. Busby

  • Differences in Pornography Use Among Couples: Associations with Satisfaction, Stability, and Relationship Processes.

    Brian J. Willoughby;Jason S. Carroll;Dean M. Busby;Cameron C. Brown

  • A factor analysis of the dyadic adjustment scale with distressed and nondistressed couples

    D. Russell Crane;Dean M. Busby;Jeffry H. Larson

  • The porn gap: Differences in men's and women's pornography patterns in couple relationships.

    Jason S. Carroll;Dean M. Busby;Brian J. Willoughby;Cameron C. Brown

  • Using Technology to Connect in Romantic Relationships: Effects on Attachment, Relationship Satisfaction, and Stability in Emerging Adults

    Lori Cluff Schade;Jonathan Sandberg;Roy Bean;Dean Busby

  • Self‐Directed, Therapist‐Directed, and Assessment‐Based Interventions for Premarital Couples*

    Dean M. Busby;David C. Ivey;Steven M. Harris;Chance Ates

  • How do I analyze thee? Let me count the ways: considering empathy in couple relationships using self and partner ratings.

    Dean M. Busby;Brandt C. Gardner

  • Couple Relationship Education at Home: Does Skill Training Enhance Relationship Assessment and Feedback?

    Kim W Halford;Keithia Lynne Wilson;Bronwyn Louise Watson;Tony Verner

  • The Brief Accessibility, Responsiveness, and Engagement (BARE) Scale: A Tool for Measuring Attachment Behavior in Couple Relationships

    Jonathan G. Sandberg;Dean M. Busby;Susan M. Johnson;Keitaro Yoshida

  • Childhood Sexual Abuse, Other Childhood Factors, and Pathways to Survivors’ Adult Relationship Quality

    Eric C. Walker;Thomas B. Holman;Dean M. Busby

  • Exploring the Effects of Sexual Desire Discrepancy Among Married Couples

    Brian J. Willoughby;Adam M. Farero;Dean M. Busby

  • A Review of Comprehensive Questionnaires Used in Premarital Education and Counseling.

    Jeffry H. Larson;Thomas B. Holman;David M. Klein;Dean M. Busby

  • In the Eye of the Beholder: Exploring Variations in the Perceptions of Pornography.

    Brian J Willoughby;Dean M Busby

  • Pathways to Relationship Aggression Between Adult Partners

    Dean M. Busby;Thomas B. Holman;Eric Walker

  • Compatibility or restraint? The effects of sexual timing on marriage relationships.

    Dean M. Busby;Jason S. Carroll;Brian J. Willoughby

  • The Association Between Partner Enhancement and Self‐Enhancement and Relationship Quality Outcomes

    Dean M. Busby;Thomas B. Holman;Sylvia Niehuis

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian J. Willoughby
Brian J. Willoughby Brigham Young University
Jeffry H. Larson
Jeffry H. Larson Brigham Young University
Jonathan G. Sandberg
Jonathan G. Sandberg Brigham Young University
W. Kim Halford
W. Kim Halford University of Queensland
Sarah M. Coyne
Sarah M. Coyne Brigham Young University
Randal D. Day
Randal D. Day Brigham Young University
Susan M. Johnson
Susan M. Johnson University of Ottawa
Larry J. Nelson
Larry J. Nelson Brigham Young University
David C. Dollahite
David C. Dollahite Brigham Young University
Douglas A. Gentile
Douglas A. Gentile Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees open up several specialized career pathways across the United States. For those interested in behavior analysis, becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a promising option. The journey to becoming a bcba in St. Louis typically requires a master’s degree, supervised experience, and successful completion of the BCBA exam.

Requirements and opportunities may vary by location. For instance, the process of becoming a bcba in St. Petersburg and meeting the bcba certification requirements in Stockton follows national standards but may include different local regulations, university partnerships, or available supervision.

If you’re considering bcba certification requirements in Tampa, it’s important to stay up-to-date with state licensure laws, program accreditation, and opportunities for continuing professional development. Exploring regional specifics can help you choose the best pathway for your goals in behavioral psychology and related areas.

Best Scientists Citing Dean M. Busby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles