World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
38
Citations
9795
World Ranking
2499
National Ranking
297

Martin Sefton publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Sefton sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 94 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Martin Sefton D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Sefton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Sefton is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of social sciences, with a focus on experimental behavioral economics studies and evolutionary game theory. The subfields they contribute to include safety research, sociology and political science, management science and operations research, general decision sciences, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their recent publications cover several topics related to cooperation and decision-making in game-theoretic contexts. Notable papers include:

  • "The role of payoff parameters for cooperation in the one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma" (2024), published in European Economic Review
  • "Communication with partially verifiable information: An experiment" (2023), published in Games and Economic Behavior
  • "Risk, Temptation, and Efficiency in the One-Shot Prisoner's Dilemma" (2021), published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "The Role of Payoff Parameters for Cooperation in the One-Shot Prisoner's Dilemma" (2024), published in SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Social preferences and the variability of conditional cooperation" (2024), published in Economic Theory

Sefton's work frequently appears in venues such as SSRN Electronic Journal, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, European Economic Review, Games and Economic Behavior, and Economic Theory.

Their research topics include:

  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Culture, Economy, and Development Studies

Frequent collaborators in their research are:

  • Kyeongtae Lee
  • Simon Gaechter
  • Till O. Weber
  • Malte Baader
  • Simon Gächter

Martin Sefton's contributions reflect a consistent engagement with the analysis of cooperation, communication, social preferences, and efficiency within strategic interaction frameworks, with their work bridging theoretical and experimental approaches.

Best Publications

  • Fairness in Simple Bargaining Experiments

    Robert Forsythe;Joel L. Horowitz;N.E. Savin;Martin Sefton

  • THE EFFECT OF REWARDS AND SANCTIONS IN PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS

    Martin Sefton;Robert Shupp;James M. Walker

  • Leading-by-example and signaling in voluntary contribution games: an experimental study

    Jan Potters;Martin Sefton;Lise Vesterlund

  • The Sequential Prisoner's Dilemma: Evidence on Reciprocation

    Kenneth Clark;Martin Sefton

  • After you—endogenous sequencing in voluntary contribution games

    Jan Potters;Martin Sefton;Lise Vesterlund

  • Peer effects in pro-social behavior: Social norms or social preferences?

    Simon Gächter;Daniele Nosenzo;Martin Sefton

  • WHO MAKES A GOOD LEADER? COOPERATIVENESS, OPTIMISM, AND LEADING‐BY‐EXAMPLE

    Simon Gächter;Daniele Nosenzo;Elke Renner;Martin Sefton

  • Funding Public Goods with Lotteries: Experimental Evidence

    John Morgan;Martin Sefton

  • When are Nash equillibria self-enforcing?: an experimental analysis

    Kenneth Clark;Stephen Kay;Martin Sefton

  • Cooperation in Small Groups: The Effect of Group Size

    Daniele Nosenzo;Simone Quercia;Martin Sefton

  • An experimental study of price dispersion

    John Morgan;Henrik Orzen;Martin Sefton

  • Endogenous entry in contests

    John Morgan;Henrik Orzen;Martin Sefton

  • Reward structures in public good experiments

    Martin Sefton;Richard Steinberg

  • Strategic behavior and learning in repeated voluntary contribution experiments

    Laurent Muller;Martin Sefton;Richard Steinberg;Lise Vesterlund

  • The impact of social comparisons on reciprocity

    Simon Gächter;Daniele Nosenzo;Martin Sefton

  • Sequential vs. simultaneous contributions to public goods: Experimental evidence

    Simon Gächter;Daniele Nosenzo;Elke Renner;Martin Sefton

  • Encouraging compliance: bonuses versus fines in inspection games

    D. Nosenzo;T. Offerman;M. Sefton;A. van der Veen

  • Combining "real effort" with induced effort costs: the ball-catching task.

    Simon Gächter;Simon Gächter;Lingbo Huang;Martin Sefton

  • Hierarchy and Opportunism in Teams

    Eline van der Heijden;Jan Potters;Martin Sefton

  • Enlargement and the balance of power: an experimental study

    Maria Montero;Martin Sefton;Ping Zhang

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Gächter
Simon Gächter University of Nottingham
John Morgan
John Morgan University of California, Berkeley
Lise Vesterlund
Lise Vesterlund University of Pittsburgh
Abdullah Yavas
Abdullah Yavas University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jan Potters
Jan Potters Tilburg University
Theo Offerman
Theo Offerman University of Amsterdam
James M. Walker
James M. Walker Indiana University
Chris Starmer
Chris Starmer University of Nottingham
Elena Katok
Elena Katok The University of Texas at Dallas
Partha Deb
Partha Deb Hunter College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Economics and Finance opens opportunities for students seeking flexibility, affordability, and accelerated career growth. For those aiming to rapidly boost their credentials, many institutions in the US now offer best accelerated mba programs that allow learners to earn an MBA in just one year. These programs blend rigorous coursework with convenience, making them ideal for working professionals.

Cost is another vital consideration. Students focused on entrepreneurship can benefit from choosing the cheapest mba entrepreneurship online options, which combine entrepreneurial skills development with budget-friendly tuition rates. Additionally, those interested in project oversight and leadership may wonder, is a bachelor degree in project management worth it? With growing demand for project managers across various industries, this degree is increasingly regarded as valuable.

For students seeking even faster entry into rewarding careers, there are fast online degrees that pay well in finance. These accelerated pathways help graduates quickly access high-paying roles in banking, investment, and corporate finance, keeping them competitive in a dynamic job market.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Sefton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles