What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Microeconomics
- Law
- Game theory
Hans-Theo Normann mostly deals with Microeconomics, Experimental economics, Cournot competition, Collusion and Competition.
His work on Oligopoly, Monopoly, Public good and Outcome as part of general Microeconomics research is frequently linked to Commit, bridging the gap between disciplines.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Incentive, Econometrics, Predictive power and Hedge in addition to Experimental economics.
His research in Cournot competition intersects with topics in Stackelberg competition and Market power.
His studies examine the connections between Collusion and genetics, as well as such issues in Repeated game, with regards to Monetary economics, Cartel, Product market and Affect.
His Competition research includes elements of Mathematical economics and Business economics.
His most cited work include:
- A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences (376 citations)
- A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences (376 citations)
- Two are few and four are many: number effects in experimental oligopolies (326 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Hans-Theo Normann mainly investigates Microeconomics, Cournot competition, Experimental economics, Collusion and Mathematical economics.
His Microeconomics research focuses on subjects like Vertical integration, which are linked to Monopoly and Foreclosure.
His Cournot competition research incorporates themes from Stackelberg competition, Competition and Best reply.
Hans-Theo Normann has included themes like Incentive, Predictive power, Econometrics and Dilemma in his Experimental economics study.
His Collusion study combines topics in areas such as Outcome, Repeated game, Cartel and Stochastic game.
As a part of the same scientific family, Hans-Theo Normann mostly works in the field of Behavioral economics, focusing on Sample and, on occasion, Ultimatum game and Dictator game.
He most often published in these fields:
- Microeconomics (61.20%)
- Cournot competition (36.00%)
- Experimental economics (45.20%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2019)?
- Microeconomics (61.20%)
- Cournot competition (36.00%)
- Collusion (25.20%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of study are Microeconomics, Cournot competition, Collusion, Laboratory experiment and Monopoly.
Hans-Theo Normann combines Microeconomics and Order in his studies.
Hans-Theo Normann has researched Cournot competition in several fields, including Econometrics, Outcome and External validity.
His Collusion research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Affect, Profit, Cartel, Repeated game and Oligopoly.
The various areas that Hans-Theo Normann examines in his Nash equilibrium study include Experimental economics and Public good.
His work deals with themes such as Best response, Preference and Social dilemma, which intersect with Experimental economics.
Between 2011 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Explicit vs. Tacit Collusion – The Impact of Communication in Oligopoly Experiments (188 citations)
- The impact of the termination rule on cooperation in a prisoner’s dilemma experiment (159 citations)
- Preferences and beliefs in a sequential social dilemma: a within-subjects analysis ☆ (103 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Microeconomics
- Law
- Game theory
Hans-Theo Normann focuses on Microeconomics, Collusion, Experimental economics, Cournot competition and Econometrics.
His work in the fields of Nash equilibrium and Monopoly overlaps with other areas such as Inequity aversion and Order.
His research integrates issues of Profit, Repeated game and Cartel in his study of Collusion.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Repeated game, Competition are connected with Affect and Dilemma and other disciplines.
While the research belongs to areas of Experimental economics, he spends his time largely on the problem of Public good, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Order.
His Tacit collusion course of study focuses on Production and Predictive power.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
